On the properties of null subjects in sign languages: the case of French Sign Language (LSF)

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Review Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1515/tlr-2022-2100
Angélique Jaber, C. Donati, C. Geraci
{"title":"On the properties of null subjects in sign languages: the case of French Sign Language (LSF)","authors":"Angélique Jaber, C. Donati, C. Geraci","doi":"10.1515/tlr-2022-2100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The typology of subject omission in simple declarative sentences ranges from languages that simply do not allow it like English and French to languages that allow it as long as a minimum degree of topicality is guaranteed like Chinese and Japanese. In between there are various languages in which subject omission is licensed, for example by rich agreement like in Italian and Spanish, or by a particular set of grammatical features like first and second person in Finnish, or tense like in Hebrew. In other languages subject omission is only limited to expletive sentences like in German. This rich typology observed in spoken languages is also attested across sign languages, with one important exception: there is no known sign language disallowing subject omission categorically. The goals of this paper are twofold: first, we apply syntactic and semantic tests to assess the boundaries of subject omission in French Sign Language and characterize it within the typology; second, we discuss in light of some particular aspects of grammars in the visual modality this apparent anomaly of sign languages.","PeriodicalId":46358,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"655 - 686"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The typology of subject omission in simple declarative sentences ranges from languages that simply do not allow it like English and French to languages that allow it as long as a minimum degree of topicality is guaranteed like Chinese and Japanese. In between there are various languages in which subject omission is licensed, for example by rich agreement like in Italian and Spanish, or by a particular set of grammatical features like first and second person in Finnish, or tense like in Hebrew. In other languages subject omission is only limited to expletive sentences like in German. This rich typology observed in spoken languages is also attested across sign languages, with one important exception: there is no known sign language disallowing subject omission categorically. The goals of this paper are twofold: first, we apply syntactic and semantic tests to assess the boundaries of subject omission in French Sign Language and characterize it within the typology; second, we discuss in light of some particular aspects of grammars in the visual modality this apparent anomaly of sign languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手语中空主语的性质——以法语手语为例
摘要简单陈述句中主语省略的类型从英语和法语等根本不允许省略的语言到汉语和日语等只要保证最低程度的话题性就允许省略的语文。在这两者之间,有各种语言允许省略主语,例如,通过意大利语和西班牙语中的丰富一致,或者通过一组特定的语法特征,如芬兰语中的第一人称和第二人称,或者希伯来语中的时态。在其他语言中,主语省略仅限于德语中的咒骂句。在口语中观察到的这种丰富的类型学也在手语中得到了证实,只有一个重要的例外:没有已知的手语明确禁止主语省略。本文的目的有两个:首先,我们运用句法和语义测试来评估法语手语中主语省略的界限,并在类型学中对其进行表征;其次,我们从视觉模态语法的某些特定方面来讨论手语的这种明显异常现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Review
Linguistic Review Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Linguistic Review aims at publishing high-quality papers in syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, within a framework of Generative Grammar and related disciplines, as well as critical discussions of theoretical linguistics as a branch of cognitive psychology. Striving to be a platform for discussion, The Linguistic Review welcomes reviews of important new monographs in these areas, dissertation abstracts, and letters to the editor. The editor also welcomes initiatives for thematic issues with guest editors. The Linguistic Review is a peer-reviewed journal of international scope.
期刊最新文献
Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese Morphological analysis of alienability contrast in Nuer: an atypical typical case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1