Hybrid media consumption and production in #ge2020: the battle to own ‘change’

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Irish Political Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/07907184.2021.1976975
Kirsty Park, Jane Suiter
{"title":"Hybrid media consumption and production in #ge2020: the battle to own ‘change’","authors":"Kirsty Park, Jane Suiter","doi":"10.1080/07907184.2021.1976975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Traditionally, political parties engage with journalists to promote their agendas and claim issue ownership through publishing manifestos, holding public events and issuing statements, but the coverage that this interaction produces is determined by the editorial focus and decision making of each outlet. In a hybrid media age, political parties can engage in disintermediation by directly shaping their own agenda and communicating with the public using social media, which also facilitate populist messaging. In this article, we use a combination of traditional media and social media data to explore how key issues and parties were mediated during the battle to own ‘change’ and claim issue ownership in the 2020 election campaign in Ireland. The analysis draws upon coded articles from three mainstream outlets and Facebook posts from the three main parties, along with user engagement data from those Facebook posts. We find that newspaper coverage reflected the framing of a change election. While Fine Gael received the most coverage, both Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin show clear attempts to own change through social media, with Sinn Féin in particular ‘owning’ the most salient election issue of housing while also deploying substantial populist messaging which resulted in the most engagement.","PeriodicalId":45746,"journal":{"name":"Irish Political Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":"628 - 646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1976975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Traditionally, political parties engage with journalists to promote their agendas and claim issue ownership through publishing manifestos, holding public events and issuing statements, but the coverage that this interaction produces is determined by the editorial focus and decision making of each outlet. In a hybrid media age, political parties can engage in disintermediation by directly shaping their own agenda and communicating with the public using social media, which also facilitate populist messaging. In this article, we use a combination of traditional media and social media data to explore how key issues and parties were mediated during the battle to own ‘change’ and claim issue ownership in the 2020 election campaign in Ireland. The analysis draws upon coded articles from three mainstream outlets and Facebook posts from the three main parties, along with user engagement data from those Facebook posts. We find that newspaper coverage reflected the framing of a change election. While Fine Gael received the most coverage, both Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin show clear attempts to own change through social media, with Sinn Féin in particular ‘owning’ the most salient election issue of housing while also deploying substantial populist messaging which resulted in the most engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#ge2020的混合媒体消费和生产:拥有“改变”的战斗
摘要传统上,政党通过发表宣言、举办公共活动和发表声明来与记者接触,以推动他们的议程,并声称问题所有权,但这种互动产生的报道取决于每个媒体的编辑重点和决策。在混合媒体时代,政党可以通过直接制定自己的议程和使用社交媒体与公众沟通来参与去中介化,这也促进了民粹主义信息的传递。在这篇文章中,我们结合传统媒体和社交媒体数据,探讨在2020年爱尔兰大选中,在争取“变革”和主张问题所有权的斗争中,关键问题和政党是如何被调解的。该分析借鉴了三家主流媒体的编码文章、三个主要政党的脸书帖子,以及这些脸书帖子的用户参与度数据。我们发现,报纸的报道反映了一场变革选举的框架。虽然Fine Gael获得了最多的报道,但Fianna Fáil和Sinn Féin都表现出了通过社交媒体实现变革的明确尝试,尤其是Sinn Fèin“拥有”了最突出的住房选举问题,同时也部署了大量民粹主义信息,这导致了最多的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Political Studies
Irish Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
A critical appraisal of the case for progressive unionism in Northern Ireland today Troubling rhetoric: discourse theory and Irish Republican Army narratives (1962–1972) Front and centre? Northern Irish electoral behaviour in the age of Brexit Republic of Ireland 2022 Northern Ireland 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1