Examining the simultaneous change in emotions during a test: relations with expended effort and test performance

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2020-07-24 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2020.1786834
S. Finney, B. Perkins, Paulius Satkus
{"title":"Examining the simultaneous change in emotions during a test: relations with expended effort and test performance","authors":"S. Finney, B. Perkins, Paulius Satkus","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2020.1786834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using a sample of 497 college students, we measured test-taking emotions (anger, worry, pride, enjoyment) after the first third, second third, and last third of a low-stakes cognitive test of sociocultural knowledge. We examined the simultaneous change in emotions and whether change in emotions predicted subsequent test-taking effort and test performance. Latent growth models indicated that, on average, enjoyment and anger increased, whereas pride and worry decreased during the test. There was significant variability in individual change about these averages. Positive correlations were observed between change in worry and anger and change in pride and enjoyment. Structural equation models indicated that all initial emotions and gains in pride during the test influenced subsequent effort, whereas initial worry, anger and enjoyment, change in pride and enjoyment, and effort influenced test scores. The findings emphasize the importance of assessing change in emotions and the mediation mechanism of effort when modeling test performance.","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15305058.2020.1786834","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2020.1786834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Using a sample of 497 college students, we measured test-taking emotions (anger, worry, pride, enjoyment) after the first third, second third, and last third of a low-stakes cognitive test of sociocultural knowledge. We examined the simultaneous change in emotions and whether change in emotions predicted subsequent test-taking effort and test performance. Latent growth models indicated that, on average, enjoyment and anger increased, whereas pride and worry decreased during the test. There was significant variability in individual change about these averages. Positive correlations were observed between change in worry and anger and change in pride and enjoyment. Structural equation models indicated that all initial emotions and gains in pride during the test influenced subsequent effort, whereas initial worry, anger and enjoyment, change in pride and enjoyment, and effort influenced test scores. The findings emphasize the importance of assessing change in emotions and the mediation mechanism of effort when modeling test performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察考试中情绪的同步变化:与付出的努力和考试成绩的关系
摘要以497名大学生为研究对象,在社会文化知识低风险认知测试的前三分之一、后三分之一和后三分之一测试后,测量了他们的应试情绪(愤怒、担忧、骄傲、享受)。我们检查了情绪的同步变化,以及情绪的变化是否预测了随后的考试努力和考试成绩。潜在增长模型显示,平均而言,在测试过程中,快乐和愤怒增加了,而骄傲和担忧减少了。这些平均值在个体变化中有显著的可变性。焦虑和愤怒的变化与骄傲和快乐的变化之间存在正相关。结构方程模型表明,在测试过程中,所有最初的情绪和自豪感的获得都会影响随后的努力,而最初的担忧、愤怒和享受、自豪感和享受的变化以及努力会影响测试成绩。研究结果强调了在模拟测试表现时评估情绪变化和努力的中介机制的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Testing
International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Combining Mokken Scale Analysis with and rasch measurement theory to explore differences in measurement quality between subgroups Examining the construct validity of the MIDUS version of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Where nonresponse is at its loudest: Cross-country and individual differences in item nonresponse across the PISA 2018 student questionnaire The choice between cognitive diagnosis and item response theory: A case study from medical education Beyond group comparisons: Accounting for intersectional sources of bias in international survey measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1