Strategic autonomy in the European Union’s external relations law

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Common Market Law Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.54648/cola2023048
F. Hoffmeister
{"title":"Strategic autonomy in the European Union’s external relations law","authors":"F. Hoffmeister","doi":"10.54648/cola2023048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews the legal significance of the European Union’s quest for “strategic autonomy” in its external relations. First the political origin of the term is recapped and a legal definition proposed: “Striving for multilateral solutions, while being able to take lawful action alone to safeguard the Union’s values, fundamental interests, security, independence and integrity!” Second, the application thereof in the EU’s common commercial policy is reviewed. In particular, the recent EU legislative initiatives that combat economic distortions on the one hand are distinguished from the pieces of EU legislation that foster EU values worldwide on the other hand. Third, the Common Foreign and Security Policy is considered. It is shown how the EU’s reaction in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to an unprecedented array of use of available instruments (European Peace Facility, ten sanctions packages, support for Ukraine for its legal cases against Russia). The conclusion identifies a new defining moment for the European project through a remarkable legal push from intergovernmental to integrationist conduct in its external relations in the 2020s.\nstrategic autonomy, external relations law, common commercial policy, CFSP, European Peace Facility","PeriodicalId":47406,"journal":{"name":"Common Market Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common Market Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2023048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews the legal significance of the European Union’s quest for “strategic autonomy” in its external relations. First the political origin of the term is recapped and a legal definition proposed: “Striving for multilateral solutions, while being able to take lawful action alone to safeguard the Union’s values, fundamental interests, security, independence and integrity!” Second, the application thereof in the EU’s common commercial policy is reviewed. In particular, the recent EU legislative initiatives that combat economic distortions on the one hand are distinguished from the pieces of EU legislation that foster EU values worldwide on the other hand. Third, the Common Foreign and Security Policy is considered. It is shown how the EU’s reaction in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to an unprecedented array of use of available instruments (European Peace Facility, ten sanctions packages, support for Ukraine for its legal cases against Russia). The conclusion identifies a new defining moment for the European project through a remarkable legal push from intergovernmental to integrationist conduct in its external relations in the 2020s. strategic autonomy, external relations law, common commercial policy, CFSP, European Peace Facility
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟对外关系法中的战略自治
本文回顾了欧盟在对外关系中寻求“战略自主”的法律意义。首先,回顾了该术语的政治起源,并提出了一个法律定义:“努力寻求多边解决方案,同时能够单独采取合法行动来维护欧盟的价值观、根本利益、安全、独立和完整!”其次,审查了其在欧盟共同商业政策中的应用。特别是,欧盟最近一方面打击经济扭曲的立法举措与另一方面在全世界促进欧盟价值观的欧盟立法有所不同。第三,考虑共同外交与安全政策。这表明,欧盟在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后的反应导致了前所未有的可用工具的使用(欧洲和平机制、十项制裁计划、支持乌克兰对俄罗斯的法律诉讼)。该结论为欧洲项目确定了一个新的决定性时刻,通过在20世纪20年代从政府间对外关系行为向一体化行为的显著法律推动。战略自主、对外关系法、共同商业政策、CFSP、欧洲和平基金
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The Common Market Law Review has provided a forum for the keenest legal minds in the fields for more than 40 years. Because of the international composition of its Editorial Board, and in view of the fact that it is able to attract contributions from all over Europe, and from the United States, the Review is able to adopt a unique approach to capitilize Community issues. Each issue contains articles dealing with matters of current interest; the authoritative treatment given to each topic ensures lasting juridical value. This pre-eminent journal brings you detailed, in-depth examination of the most pressing and far-reaching issues on Community Law.
期刊最新文献
Fostering in absentia proceedings when the individual absconds: Criminal proceedings against IR Central banks and inequality Book Review: Judicial Review of Administration in Europe: Procedural Fairness and Propriety, by Giacinto della Cananea and Mauro Bussani. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) National constitutional identity as a tool for protecting the autonomy of the EU legal order: Costello v. The Government of Ireland Book Review: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the European Union: The Impact on Law and Governance, by Carmine Conte. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1