Self-Determination of Peoples in the Charter of the United Nations

P. Kilian
{"title":"Self-Determination of Peoples in the Charter of the United Nations","authors":"P. Kilian","doi":"10.4013/rechtd.2019.113.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyses the principle of self-determination of peoples as contained in the Charter of the United Nations. Using the traditional methods of treaty interpretation, it argues that the Charter does not in itself guarantee the right to self-determination of specific entities in a particular way. The Charter merely enshrines a legal principle that has subsequently been translated into particular norms by successive treaties and customary law. On the other hand, the Charter does not limit the scope of self-determination to the colonial context or to entire populations of sovereign states. Therefore, and since the principle does not imply independence, self-determination could well be applied to various non-state groups, as has already happened in the case of indigenous peoples.","PeriodicalId":53186,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito","volume":"11 1","pages":"341-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2019.113.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay analyses the principle of self-determination of peoples as contained in the Charter of the United Nations. Using the traditional methods of treaty interpretation, it argues that the Charter does not in itself guarantee the right to self-determination of specific entities in a particular way. The Charter merely enshrines a legal principle that has subsequently been translated into particular norms by successive treaties and customary law. On the other hand, the Charter does not limit the scope of self-determination to the colonial context or to entire populations of sovereign states. Therefore, and since the principle does not imply independence, self-determination could well be applied to various non-state groups, as has already happened in the case of indigenous peoples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《联合国宪章》规定的人民自决
本文分析了《联合国宪章》所载的各国人民自决的原则。它利用传统的条约解释方法认为,《宪章》本身并没有以特定的方式保证具体实体的自决权。《宪章》只是载列了一项法律原则,该原则后来被一系列条约和习惯法转化为具体规范。另一方面,《宪章》并没有把自决的范围限制在殖民背景下或主权国家的全体人民。因此,由于这项原则并不意味着独立,自决完全可以适用于各种非国家群体,土著人民的情况已经发生了这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) is published by UNISINOS three times a year and it aims to publish original research papers, articles for discussion and book reviews in the following areas: Hermeneutics, Constitution and Realization of Rights; Society, New Rights and Transnationalization. The articles or unpublished papers will be published in the language they were submitted and will be evaluated by at least two reviewers using the double blind review system. In other words, during the evaluation process the author’s name will not be revealed to the referees and neither the referees’ names will be revealed to the author.
期刊最新文献
As controvérsias entre moral e a indenização por danos morais com a responsabilidade objetiva civil do Estado no tratamento com hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina para a Covid-19 no Brasil Estado de cosas inconstitucional y sistema penitenciario y carcelario de Colombia Apresentação constitutionalism “of” the Global South? Epistemological reflections on emerging constitutional trends Constitutional theory and the limits to the punitive power: the Italian case of prisoners’ right to judicial protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1