Identification of possible Lynch syndrome in endometrial carcinomas at a public hospital in South Africa

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/20742835.2020.1745461
R. Wadee, W. Grayson
{"title":"Identification of possible Lynch syndrome in endometrial carcinomas at a public hospital in South Africa","authors":"R. Wadee, W. Grayson","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2020.1745461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endometrial carcinomas are common malignancies worldwide. Microsatellite instability is often identified in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) and in most Lynch syndrome (LS) associated tumours. The authors aimed to identify the number of EECs at a South African public hospital, using the four-mismatch repair immunohistochemical stains, which may suggest possible LS, for the period 2009–2015. Following ethical clearance, 145 cases of archived EEC underwent immunohistochemical testing for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Cases demonstrating loss of MLH1 staining were subjected to EpiTYPER for quantitative methylation of the MLH1 promoter region using the Agena MassARRAY® platform. Forty-one (28.28%) cases showed complete loss of tumour nuclei staining for ≥ 1 immunohistochemical stains. Twenty cases (13.79%) showed loss of MLH1/PMS2, 16 cases (11.03%) demonstrated isolated MLH1 loss and one case (0.69%) showed loss of MLH1, PMS2 and MSH6. Two cases showed isolated MSH6 loss and 2 cases showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6. Thirty-seven (90.24%) of 41 mismatch repair-deficient cases showed MLH1 loss. Most (83.78%) of these showed promoter hypermethylation, suggesting a sporadic occurrence of carcinogenesis. The patients from whom the two cases with isolated MSH6 loss, two cases with MSH2/MSH6 loss, and the six cases whereby MLH1 was not explained by methylation should be identified and offered genetic counselling with a view to possible germline mutation assessment as these patients are suspected of having Lynch syndrome. Thus, this study demonstrates a possible 10/145 (6.90%) patients who may have LS and require further testing and suggests a need to screen possible LS patients in the South African population.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":"12 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2020.1745461","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2020.1745461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Endometrial carcinomas are common malignancies worldwide. Microsatellite instability is often identified in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) and in most Lynch syndrome (LS) associated tumours. The authors aimed to identify the number of EECs at a South African public hospital, using the four-mismatch repair immunohistochemical stains, which may suggest possible LS, for the period 2009–2015. Following ethical clearance, 145 cases of archived EEC underwent immunohistochemical testing for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Cases demonstrating loss of MLH1 staining were subjected to EpiTYPER for quantitative methylation of the MLH1 promoter region using the Agena MassARRAY® platform. Forty-one (28.28%) cases showed complete loss of tumour nuclei staining for ≥ 1 immunohistochemical stains. Twenty cases (13.79%) showed loss of MLH1/PMS2, 16 cases (11.03%) demonstrated isolated MLH1 loss and one case (0.69%) showed loss of MLH1, PMS2 and MSH6. Two cases showed isolated MSH6 loss and 2 cases showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6. Thirty-seven (90.24%) of 41 mismatch repair-deficient cases showed MLH1 loss. Most (83.78%) of these showed promoter hypermethylation, suggesting a sporadic occurrence of carcinogenesis. The patients from whom the two cases with isolated MSH6 loss, two cases with MSH2/MSH6 loss, and the six cases whereby MLH1 was not explained by methylation should be identified and offered genetic counselling with a view to possible germline mutation assessment as these patients are suspected of having Lynch syndrome. Thus, this study demonstrates a possible 10/145 (6.90%) patients who may have LS and require further testing and suggests a need to screen possible LS patients in the South African population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非一家公立医院对子宫内膜癌可能的林奇综合征的鉴定
子宫内膜癌是世界范围内常见的恶性肿瘤。微卫星不稳定性通常在子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌(EECs)和大多数林奇综合征(LS)相关肿瘤中发现。作者旨在使用四种错配修复免疫组织化学染色来确定南非公立医院2009-2015年期间EEC的数量,这可能表明可能存在LS。伦理审查通过后,145例存档EEC病例接受了MLH1、MSH2、MSH6和PMS2的免疫组织化学检测。使用Agena MassARRAY®平台,对MLH1染色缺失的病例进行EpiTYPER,以对MLH1启动子区进行定量甲基化。41例(28.28%)显示肿瘤细胞核染色完全丢失,免疫组化染色≥1。20例(13.79%)表现为MLH1/PMS2缺失,16例(11.03%)表现为孤立的MLH1缺失,1例(0.69%)表现出MLH1、PMS2和MSH6缺失。2例表现为孤立的MSH6损失,2例表现出MSH2和MSH6的损失。41例错配修复缺陷病例中有37例(90.24%)显示MLH1缺失。其中大多数(83.78%)表现出启动子超甲基化,提示致癌作用的偶发发生。应确定两例MSH6缺失、两例MSH2/MSH6缺失和六例MLH1未通过甲基化解释的患者,并为其提供基因咨询,以评估可能的种系突变,因为这些患者被怀疑患有林奇综合征。因此,这项研究表明,可能有10/145(6.90%)的患者患有LS,需要进一步检测,并表明有必要在南非人群中筛查可能的LS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retrospective review of 37.4 Gy in 11 fractions for the palliation of advanced cervical cancer Challenges managing women with suspected Lynch Syndrome in Zimbabwe: a case report A retrospective study comparing the efficiency of recurrent LSIL cytology to high-grade cytology as predictors of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+) A retrospective study of the epidemiology and histological subtypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection in carcinoma of the vulva: experience and intermediate results at one institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1