Herpes simplex virus reactivation in patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective cohort study

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antiviral Therapy Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1177/13596535211068613
A. Chiesa, Micol Pallanza, G. Martinetti, Fabio Lanzi, M. Previsdomini, A. Pagnamenta, L. Elzi
{"title":"Herpes simplex virus reactivation in patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective cohort study","authors":"A. Chiesa, Micol Pallanza, G. Martinetti, Fabio Lanzi, M. Previsdomini, A. Pagnamenta, L. Elzi","doi":"10.1177/13596535211068613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There is a paucity of data about the occurrence and risk factors of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation among patients with severe COVID-19 presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods We performed a nested case-control study among a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with ARDS. Between March and April 2020, all consecutive mechanically ventilated patients ≥18 years old with a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 on mucocutaneous samples were included in the study. We collected data on demographics, medical history, laboratory variables, administration of antivirals and other agents, respiratory and organ support procedures, microbiological results, and management of ARDS with prone positioning and the use of steroids. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were performed in order to identify predictors of HSV reactivation. Results Eighty-three patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted to the ICU for mechanical ventilation. 18/83 (21.7%) patients developed mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus reactivation after a median of 17 days (IQR, 14–20). Prone positioning was the only independent risk factor for HSV reactivation (adj. hazard ratios, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.11–2.30; P = 0.009). All patients with mucocutaneous HSV reactivation were treated with antivirals. The outcome in terms of ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and in-hospital mortality was similar for patients with and without HSV reactivation. Conclusions HSV reactivation is frequent in COVID-19 patients with ARDS, especially if prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation with prone positioning is needed. Prompt testing for HSV and initiation of antiviral therapy should be performed in case of mucocutaneous lesions in this population.","PeriodicalId":8364,"journal":{"name":"Antiviral Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiviral Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13596535211068613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background There is a paucity of data about the occurrence and risk factors of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation among patients with severe COVID-19 presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods We performed a nested case-control study among a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with ARDS. Between March and April 2020, all consecutive mechanically ventilated patients ≥18 years old with a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 on mucocutaneous samples were included in the study. We collected data on demographics, medical history, laboratory variables, administration of antivirals and other agents, respiratory and organ support procedures, microbiological results, and management of ARDS with prone positioning and the use of steroids. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were performed in order to identify predictors of HSV reactivation. Results Eighty-three patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted to the ICU for mechanical ventilation. 18/83 (21.7%) patients developed mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus reactivation after a median of 17 days (IQR, 14–20). Prone positioning was the only independent risk factor for HSV reactivation (adj. hazard ratios, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.11–2.30; P = 0.009). All patients with mucocutaneous HSV reactivation were treated with antivirals. The outcome in terms of ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and in-hospital mortality was similar for patients with and without HSV reactivation. Conclusions HSV reactivation is frequent in COVID-19 patients with ARDS, especially if prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation with prone positioning is needed. Prompt testing for HSV and initiation of antiviral therapy should be performed in case of mucocutaneous lesions in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单纯疱疹病毒在COVID-19合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的再激活:一项前瞻性队列研究
背景在伴有急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的严重新冠肺炎患者中,单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)再激活的发生率和危险因素资料匮乏。方法我们对一组严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染的ARDS患者进行了嵌套病例对照研究。2020年3月至4月期间,所有连续的机械通气患者均被纳入研究,这些患者年龄≥18岁,且粘膜样本中的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型PCR呈阳性。我们收集了有关人口统计学、病史、实验室变量、抗病毒药物和其他药物的使用、呼吸和器官支持程序、微生物学结果以及俯卧位和类固醇使用的ARDS管理的数据。采用单变量和多变量Cox回归模型来确定HSV再激活的预测因素。结果83例实验室确诊的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染者被送入重症监护室进行机械通气。18/83(21.7%)患者在中位17天后出现粘膜皮肤单纯疱疹病毒再激活(IQR,14-20)。俯卧位是HSV再激活的唯一独立危险因素(调整后的危险比,1.60;95%可信区间,1.11–2.30;P=0.009)。所有粘膜皮肤HSV再活化的患者都接受了抗病毒药物治疗。有和没有HSV再激活的患者在呼吸机相关肺炎、导管相关血流感染和住院死亡率方面的结果相似。结论新冠肺炎ARDS患者HSV再激活频繁,尤其是在需要长期俯卧位有创机械通气的情况下。在该人群中出现粘膜皮肤病变的情况下,应立即进行HSV检测并开始抗病毒治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antiviral Therapy
Antiviral Therapy 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Antiviral Therapy (an official publication of the International Society of Antiviral Research) is an international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to publishing articles on the clinical development and use of antiviral agents and vaccines, and the treatment of all viral diseases. Antiviral Therapy is one of the leading journals in virology and infectious diseases. The journal is comprehensive, and publishes articles concerning all clinical aspects of antiviral therapy. It features editorials, original research papers, specially commissioned review articles, letters and book reviews. The journal is aimed at physicians and specialists interested in clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Antiviral potential of phenolic compounds against HSV-1: In-vitro study. Comparative efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide in the initial 48-week treatment of high viral load chronic hepatitis B: A single-centre retrospective study. Clinical outcomes in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 treated with monoclonal antibody therapy versus an untreated control cohort. In-silico approach to characterize the structure and function of a hypothetical protein of Monkeypox virus exploring Chordopox-A20R domain-containing protein activity. Andrographolide suppresses SARS-CoV-2 infection by downregulating ACE2 expression: A mechanistic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1