Muscle Activation and Torso Movement during Exercise using Novel Fiberglass Resistance Poles

Q3 Health Professions Open Sports Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-28 DOI:10.2174/1875399x02114010144
S. Glass
{"title":"Muscle Activation and Torso Movement during Exercise using Novel Fiberglass Resistance Poles","authors":"S. Glass","doi":"10.2174/1875399x02114010144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n A novel form of functional training utilizes flexible fiberglass poles for resistance. Similar to elastic bands, as the poles flex, resistance increases. To date, no studies have examined activation patterns associated with such implements.\n \n \n \n This study examined muscle activation and torso rotation using different pole resistance intensities during a “push-pull” rotational core exercise.\n \n \n \n Twenty-one subjects (16 women, 5 men; age=20.4±1.3y) completed 6 trials of 10 repetitions each of a standing push and pull movement with 3 different pole tensions (very light, light, moderate). Muscle activation (electromyography) for the anterior and posterior deltoid, abdominal oblique, and paraspinal muscles were recorded. Concentric contractions during the push phase (PUSH) and the pull load (PULL) phases were recoded, and percent maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC) was computed. Markers on the acromion process and a vertically mounted camera were used to record torso rotation during each push and pull. ANOVA for each muscle and PUSH and PULL was used for comparisons across pole intensity.\n \n \n \n Significant main effects for torso rotation were seen, with rotation with the very light pole (Push= 61.9 ± 9.20, Pull= 64.8 ± 14.00) significantly greater than moderate (Push= 52.0 ± 12.80, Pull= 54.9 ± 10.10). EMG data were highly variable, with no differences in muscle activation detected across pole resistance loads.\n \n \n \n Variability of the EMG data prevent clear resolution of activation patterns. However, torso rotation is limited with heavier pole resistance since increased pole flex also increases resistance.\n","PeriodicalId":38865,"journal":{"name":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x02114010144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A novel form of functional training utilizes flexible fiberglass poles for resistance. Similar to elastic bands, as the poles flex, resistance increases. To date, no studies have examined activation patterns associated with such implements. This study examined muscle activation and torso rotation using different pole resistance intensities during a “push-pull” rotational core exercise. Twenty-one subjects (16 women, 5 men; age=20.4±1.3y) completed 6 trials of 10 repetitions each of a standing push and pull movement with 3 different pole tensions (very light, light, moderate). Muscle activation (electromyography) for the anterior and posterior deltoid, abdominal oblique, and paraspinal muscles were recorded. Concentric contractions during the push phase (PUSH) and the pull load (PULL) phases were recoded, and percent maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC) was computed. Markers on the acromion process and a vertically mounted camera were used to record torso rotation during each push and pull. ANOVA for each muscle and PUSH and PULL was used for comparisons across pole intensity. Significant main effects for torso rotation were seen, with rotation with the very light pole (Push= 61.9 ± 9.20, Pull= 64.8 ± 14.00) significantly greater than moderate (Push= 52.0 ± 12.80, Pull= 54.9 ± 10.10). EMG data were highly variable, with no differences in muscle activation detected across pole resistance loads. Variability of the EMG data prevent clear resolution of activation patterns. However, torso rotation is limited with heavier pole resistance since increased pole flex also increases resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型玻璃纤维阻力杆运动时的肌肉激活和躯干运动
一种新形式的功能训练利用柔性玻璃纤维杆的阻力。与橡皮筋类似,当两极弯曲时,阻力增加。到目前为止,还没有研究检查与这些工具相关的激活模式。这项研究在“推拉”旋转核心练习中使用不同的极阻力强度来检查肌肉激活和躯干旋转。21例受试者(女性16例,男性5例;年龄=20.4±1.3岁)在3种不同的极张力(极轻、轻、中)下完成6组每组10次的站立推拉动作。记录前三角肌、后三角肌、腹斜肌和棘旁肌的肌肉活动(肌电图)。在推期(push)和拉荷载(pull)阶段的同心收缩被重新编码,并计算最大自愿收缩百分比(%MVC)。使用肩峰上的标记和垂直安装的摄像机记录每次推拉时的躯干旋转。每个肌肉和PUSH和PULL的方差分析用于杆子强度的比较。躯干旋转的主效应显著,极轻旋转(Push= 61.9±9.20,Pull= 64.8±14.00)显著大于中度旋转(Push= 52.0±12.80,Pull= 54.9±10.10)。肌电图数据是高度可变的,在不同的极电阻负荷下检测到的肌肉激活没有差异。肌电图数据的可变性阻碍了对激活模式的清晰分辨。然而,躯干旋转是有限的较重的极阻力,因为增加极弯曲也增加阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Sports Sciences Journal
Open Sports Sciences Journal Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Different Smoothing Window Lengths can Estimate the Neuromuscular Fatigue Threshold at The same Intensity of the Lactate Threshold During the Leg Press Exercise Different Smoothing Window Lengths can Estimate the Neuromuscular Fatigue Threshold at The same Intensity of the Lactate Threshold During the Leg Press Exercise Attitudes towards LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Canadian Figure Skating The Post-Exercise Lower Limbs Recovery Process: A Questionnaire Applied To Physiotherapists Inflammatory Indices During and After a Randomized Controlled Trial on Exercise in Old Adults: Could Moderate-Intensity Exercise Be Safe Enough? (Active Elderly and Health – Clinicaltrials.Gov, Nct03858114)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1