Association between cluster analysis for multiple measures and International Classification of Diseases 11th revision as classification of chronic pain patients

Pain Research Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.35.141
A. Kawai, Keiko Yamada, Saeko Hamaoka, Satoko Chiba, K. Wakaizumi, K. Yamaguchi, M. Iseki
{"title":"Association between cluster analysis for multiple measures and International Classification of Diseases 11th revision as classification of chronic pain patients","authors":"A. Kawai, Keiko Yamada, Saeko Hamaoka, Satoko Chiba, K. Wakaizumi, K. Yamaguchi, M. Iseki","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.35.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cluster analysis can classify patients with chronic pain using multiple scales, and classification of chronic pain will be adopted in the International Classification of Diseases 11 th revision (ICD– 11 ) in 2022 . In the present study, we aimed to investi-gate whether cluster analysis was practical for classifying chronic pain and to determine the association between these two classifications for chronic pain. This study included 229 patients with chronic pain who completed a self–reported questionnaire at the first visit to a pain clinic in a university hospital. Patients were clustered using a two–step cluster analysis (TSCA), a machine learning method, for the scores of nine questionnaires. Thereafter, the proportions of clusters among major and several minor classifications were tested using the analysis of covariance adjusted for age and doctor. The following three clusters were calculated using TSCA: mild, moderate, and severe symptoms. Among the major classifications of chronic pain in ICD– 11 , the distribution of clusters significantly differed, but the proportions of these three clusters in each chronic pain classification did not differ. Our findings suggested that TSCA for multiple measures may be a better approach for the classification of chronic pain, but its classification is not associated with the classification of chronic pain in ICD– 11 . The P–values of chronic widespread primary pain and others were calculated for comparison with chronic localized primary pain by the analysis of covariance using Dunnett’s test. The P–values of chronic centralized and other neuropathic pain were calculated for comparison with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain by the analysis of covariance using Dunnett’s test. The P–values of chronic non–specific and other pain were calculat ed for comparison with chronic structurally changed musculoskeletal pain by the analysis of covariance using Dunnett’s test. The analysis of covariance was adjusted for age and doctor.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.35.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cluster analysis can classify patients with chronic pain using multiple scales, and classification of chronic pain will be adopted in the International Classification of Diseases 11 th revision (ICD– 11 ) in 2022 . In the present study, we aimed to investi-gate whether cluster analysis was practical for classifying chronic pain and to determine the association between these two classifications for chronic pain. This study included 229 patients with chronic pain who completed a self–reported questionnaire at the first visit to a pain clinic in a university hospital. Patients were clustered using a two–step cluster analysis (TSCA), a machine learning method, for the scores of nine questionnaires. Thereafter, the proportions of clusters among major and several minor classifications were tested using the analysis of covariance adjusted for age and doctor. The following three clusters were calculated using TSCA: mild, moderate, and severe symptoms. Among the major classifications of chronic pain in ICD– 11 , the distribution of clusters significantly differed, but the proportions of these three clusters in each chronic pain classification did not differ. Our findings suggested that TSCA for multiple measures may be a better approach for the classification of chronic pain, but its classification is not associated with the classification of chronic pain in ICD– 11 . The P–values of chronic widespread primary pain and others were calculated for comparison with chronic localized primary pain by the analysis of covariance using Dunnett’s test. The P–values of chronic centralized and other neuropathic pain were calculated for comparison with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain by the analysis of covariance using Dunnett’s test. The P–values of chronic non–specific and other pain were calculat ed for comparison with chronic structurally changed musculoskeletal pain by the analysis of covariance using Dunnett’s test. The analysis of covariance was adjusted for age and doctor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多指标聚类分析与《国际疾病分类》第11版作为慢性疼痛患者分类的关系
聚类分析可以使用多个尺度对慢性疼痛患者进行分类,慢性疼痛的分类将在2022年国际疾病分类第11次修订(ICD - 11)中采用。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨聚类分析是否适用于慢性疼痛分类,并确定这两种分类之间的关系。这项研究包括229名慢性疼痛患者,他们在第一次去大学医院的疼痛诊所时完成了一份自我报告问卷。患者使用两步聚类分析(TSCA),一种机器学习方法,对九份问卷的分数进行聚类。然后,使用协方差分析对年龄和医生进行调整,检验主要和几个次要分类之间的聚类比例。使用TSCA计算以下三个聚类:轻度、中度和重度症状。在ICD - 11的主要慢性疼痛分类中,聚类分布有显著差异,但这三种聚类在各慢性疼痛分类中的占比无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,多种测量方法的TSCA可能是一种更好的慢性疼痛分类方法,但其分类与ICD - 11中的慢性疼痛分类无关。采用Dunnett检验进行协方差分析,计算慢性广漫性原发性疼痛和其他慢性局限性原发性疼痛的p值,并与慢性局限性原发性疼痛进行比较。采用Dunnett检验进行协方差分析,计算慢性集中性和其他神经性疼痛的p值,与慢性周围神经性疼痛进行比较。采用Dunnett检验进行协方差分析,计算慢性非特异性疼痛和其他疼痛的p值,并与慢性结构改变的肌肉骨骼疼痛进行比较。协方差分析对年龄和医生进行了调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Interaction between dorsal horn neuron subsets operated by a neuropeptide Y and prodynorphin promoter and its contribution to Aβ fiber–induced allodynia–like behavior in rats Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Expression profiles of Tmem120A ⁄ TACAN in rat skeletal muscle subjected to exercise and inflammation Outcomes of 707 cervical selective nerve root blocks using a fluoroscopy–guided posterolateral oblique approach Exploratory study of factors affecting quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A cross–sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1