Comparison of Partograms for Spontaneous and Induced Labour

T. Parijatha, G. Vijayabharathi
{"title":"Comparison of Partograms for Spontaneous and Induced\nLabour","authors":"T. Parijatha, G. Vijayabharathi","doi":"10.47799/pimr.0902.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Labour is a unique experience in a normal\nwoman's life. If it is prolonged and tedious it may produce a\npicture of mental anguish and physical morbidity. For the newborn child, prolonged labor will pose danger to its survival and\nsubsequent neurological development. We in the current study\ntried to evaluate the use of partograms for spontaneous and\ninduced labor in primi and multis para women.\nMethods: A total of n=150 cases were studied, and this includes\nboth primis and multigravidae attending Prathima Hospital.\nThey were divided into 3 groups (groups A, B & C) patients in\nnormal true labor and those in whom induction was used. The\ninduced group was again divided into those induced with PGE2\ngel or oxytocin. The modified WHO partogram starts with 4cms\ncervical dilatation. partograms were plotted to assess the\nprogress of labor in each group and analyzed.\nResults: Group A for 52% primis and 64% multis the partogram\nfell before the alert line i.e. thedelivered before reaching the\nalert line, Group – B 56% primis and 48% multis in the\npartogrammoved between the alert and action lines. In GroupA 8% primis and 1% multis have reached orcrossed the action\nline. 12% primis and 1% multis in group-B have reached or\ncrossed the actionline. 28% primis and 16% multis in group-C\nhave reached or crossed the action line,Interventions like\nforceps delivery or cesarean section was done for those who\nhave reached orcrossed the action line\nConclusion: Partogram is a useful Non-invasive tool for\nmonitoring the progress of labor in both spontaneous and\ninduced labor for primis and multis. The Maternal and Fetal\noutcome is extremely favorable when partographic monitoring\nis done in parturients. The partogram helps us to take up\ndecisive interventions in the form of accelerating labor,\ninstrumental vaginal delivery (outlet Forceps/ventouse), and\ncesarean section","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.0902.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Labour is a unique experience in a normal woman's life. If it is prolonged and tedious it may produce a picture of mental anguish and physical morbidity. For the newborn child, prolonged labor will pose danger to its survival and subsequent neurological development. We in the current study tried to evaluate the use of partograms for spontaneous and induced labor in primi and multis para women. Methods: A total of n=150 cases were studied, and this includes both primis and multigravidae attending Prathima Hospital. They were divided into 3 groups (groups A, B & C) patients in normal true labor and those in whom induction was used. The induced group was again divided into those induced with PGE2 gel or oxytocin. The modified WHO partogram starts with 4cms cervical dilatation. partograms were plotted to assess the progress of labor in each group and analyzed. Results: Group A for 52% primis and 64% multis the partogram fell before the alert line i.e. thedelivered before reaching the alert line, Group – B 56% primis and 48% multis in the partogrammoved between the alert and action lines. In GroupA 8% primis and 1% multis have reached orcrossed the action line. 12% primis and 1% multis in group-B have reached or crossed the actionline. 28% primis and 16% multis in group-C have reached or crossed the action line,Interventions like forceps delivery or cesarean section was done for those who have reached orcrossed the action line Conclusion: Partogram is a useful Non-invasive tool for monitoring the progress of labor in both spontaneous and induced labor for primis and multis. The Maternal and Fetal outcome is extremely favorable when partographic monitoring is done in parturients. The partogram helps us to take up decisive interventions in the form of accelerating labor, instrumental vaginal delivery (outlet Forceps/ventouse), and cesarean section
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然产程与引产产程的比较
背景:分娩是普通女性一生中独一无二的经历。如果它是长时间和乏味的,它可能产生一个画面的精神痛苦和身体疾病。对于新生儿来说,长时间的分娩会对其生存和随后的神经发育构成危险。在当前的研究中,我们试图评估在初产和多产妇女中使用产程图进行自然和引产的效果。方法:对在普拉蒂玛医院就诊的初产妇和多胎产妇共150例进行研究。将产妇分为A、B、C组,分别为真产异常组和引产组。再将诱导组分为pge2凝胶诱导组和催产素诱导组。修改后的世卫组织分段从4厘米宫颈扩张开始。绘制剖宫产图,评估各组产程并进行分析。结果:A组52%的原体和64%的倍数落在警戒线之前,即到达警戒线之前分娩,B组56%的原体和48%的倍数在警戒线和行动线之间。在a组中,8%的原体和1%的复数已经达到或越过了在线动作。b组中12%的质点和1%的质点达到或越过了动作线上。28%初产妇和16%产妇达到或越过动作线,对达到或越过动作线者采取产钳或剖宫产等干预措施。结论:产程描记术是监测初产妇和产妇自然分娩和引产过程的一种有效的无创工具。对产妇进行产程监护,对母婴结局极为有利。剖宫产图帮助我们采取决定性的干预措施,以加速分娩,阴道分娩工具(出口产钳/静脉导管)和剖宫产的形式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of peripheral lymph node tuberculosis: a prospective study of 24 cases Histopathological study on the spectrum of various sinonasal lesions Socio-demographic correlates and psychosocial stressors among suicide attempters attending a tertiary care general hospital Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1