Fecal Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Among Women with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Q4 Medicine Journal of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1764198
J. Fante, C. Juliato, C. Benetti-Pinto, L. Brito
{"title":"Fecal Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Among Women with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency","authors":"J. Fante, C. Juliato, C. Benetti-Pinto, L. Brito","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives  To assess the status of the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) of premature ovarian insufficiency women (POI women) and the incidence of fecal incontinence (FI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods  A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study with 150 women with POI was performed. Pelvic floor muscle assessment was performed with the PERFECT scale. The subscales POPDI-6 and CRADI-8 of the questionnaire Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) were used for pelvic floor symptoms focused on FI and POP. Moreover, FI and POP were also assessed as dichotomous variables (yes/no). Results  Women with FI and POP did not present differences in the PFM assessment across P ( p  = 0.61), E ( p  = 0.78), R ( p  = 0.22), and F ( p  = 0.79) variables when compared with women with POI; no differences were also seen between women with and without POP according the pelvic muscles: P ( p  = 0.91), E ( p  = 0.99), R ( p  = 0.62), and F ( p  = 0.10). Women with FI and POP presented higher scores in all PFDI-20 subscales and total score when compared with the control group ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions  Pelvic floor muscle assessment within POI women with or without FI or POP did not differ. However, PF symptoms are more severe in the FI or POP groups.","PeriodicalId":15408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coloproctology","volume":"43 1","pages":"007 - 011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives  To assess the status of the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) of premature ovarian insufficiency women (POI women) and the incidence of fecal incontinence (FI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods  A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study with 150 women with POI was performed. Pelvic floor muscle assessment was performed with the PERFECT scale. The subscales POPDI-6 and CRADI-8 of the questionnaire Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) were used for pelvic floor symptoms focused on FI and POP. Moreover, FI and POP were also assessed as dichotomous variables (yes/no). Results  Women with FI and POP did not present differences in the PFM assessment across P ( p  = 0.61), E ( p  = 0.78), R ( p  = 0.22), and F ( p  = 0.79) variables when compared with women with POI; no differences were also seen between women with and without POP according the pelvic muscles: P ( p  = 0.91), E ( p  = 0.99), R ( p  = 0.62), and F ( p  = 0.10). Women with FI and POP presented higher scores in all PFDI-20 subscales and total score when compared with the control group ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions  Pelvic floor muscle assessment within POI women with or without FI or POP did not differ. However, PF symptoms are more severe in the FI or POP groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢早衰妇女排便失禁或盆腔器官脱垂
抽象目标 评估卵巢早衰妇女(POI妇女)盆底肌(PFM)的状况以及大便失禁(FI)和盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的发生率。方法 对一项针对150名POI女性的横断面研究进行了二次分析。采用完美量表进行盆底肌肉评估。盆底疼痛量表-20(PFDI-20)的分量表POPDI-6和CRADI-8用于研究以FI和POP为重点的盆底症状。此外,FI和POP也被评估为二分变量(是/否)。后果 患有FI和POP的女性在PFM评估中没有表现出P之间的差异(P = 0.61),E(p = 0.78),R(p = 0.22)和F(p = 0.79)变量;在有和没有POP的女性之间,根据骨盆肌肉也没有发现差异:P(P = 0.91),E(p = 0.99),R(p = 0.62)和F(p = 0.10)。与对照组相比,患有FI和POP的女性在所有PFDI-20分量表和总分中表现出更高的分数(p < 0.05)。结论 在有或没有FI或POP的POI女性中,盆底肌肉评估没有差异。然而,FI或POP组的PF症状更为严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Coloproctology
Journal of Coloproctology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Salvia officinalis in the Treatment of Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in a Rat Model Unusual Case of Colonic Intussusception Caused by Angiolipoma: Case Report and Literature Review Vegetating Lesions that Appear in the Scar after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Tumors: Tumor Regrowth or Benign Neoplasm? Retrospective Study of Patients Submitted to Appendectomy in a Tertiary Hospital: Is There a Difference between the Public and Supplementary Health System? Pilonidal Sinus of the Anal Canal: A Rare Entity - Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1