Allometric scaling for normalizing maximal oxygen uptake in elite rugby union players

Q4 Health Professions Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.18176/archmeddeporte.00122
Alicia S. Canda, L. F. Agorreta, M. Marina-Breysse, Lucia Sainz, M. Rabadán
{"title":"Allometric scaling for normalizing maximal oxygen uptake in elite rugby union players","authors":"Alicia S. Canda, L. F. Agorreta, M. Marina-Breysse, Lucia Sainz, M. Rabadán","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The relation of a biological variable to body mass is typically characterized by an allometric scaling law. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between oxygen consumption (VO2max), as a parameter of aerobic exercise performance, and body composition in rugby players. Material and method: The sample included one hundred and seven males of the Spanish rugby team. Age: 25.1 ± 3.4 years; body mass (BM): 89.8 ± 11.7 kg, height: 182.4 ± 6.5 cm; 52 backs (BR) and 55 forwards (FR). Maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max, l.min-1) was measured during treadmill exercise test with progressive workload. Anthropometrical measurements were performed to estimate the fat-free mass (FFM) and muscle mass (MM). The allometric exponent “b” was determined from equation y = a * xb; where “y” is VO2max and, “x” is the corresponding mass (BM, FFM or MM) and “a” is one constant. Results: The VO2max was 4.87 ± 0.56 l.min-1, BR vs FR, 4.67 ± 0.48 l.min-1 vs 5.06 ± 0.06 l.min-1; FFM: 77.5±7.7 kg, 73.5±7 kg vs 81.3±6.3 kg; and MM: 52.9±6.5 kg, 49.6±5.6 kg vs 56.1±5.8 kg. The allometric exponents (p <0.0001; R2 = 0.4) were: 0.58 for BM (95% CI: 0.45 - 0.72); 0.71 for FFM (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.90); and 0.58 for MM (95% CI: 0.43 - 0.73). Significant differences (p <0.0001) were found BR vs FR according to their anthropometric characteristics and VO2max with respect to BM and MM without allometric scaling. While the VO2max indexed by means of allometric scaling was similar between BR and FR. Conclusions: In comparative studies, the VO2max should be expressed proportional to the 0.58 power of body mass or related to FFM in order to take into account the variability in of body composition in rugby players.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The relation of a biological variable to body mass is typically characterized by an allometric scaling law. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between oxygen consumption (VO2max), as a parameter of aerobic exercise performance, and body composition in rugby players. Material and method: The sample included one hundred and seven males of the Spanish rugby team. Age: 25.1 ± 3.4 years; body mass (BM): 89.8 ± 11.7 kg, height: 182.4 ± 6.5 cm; 52 backs (BR) and 55 forwards (FR). Maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max, l.min-1) was measured during treadmill exercise test with progressive workload. Anthropometrical measurements were performed to estimate the fat-free mass (FFM) and muscle mass (MM). The allometric exponent “b” was determined from equation y = a * xb; where “y” is VO2max and, “x” is the corresponding mass (BM, FFM or MM) and “a” is one constant. Results: The VO2max was 4.87 ± 0.56 l.min-1, BR vs FR, 4.67 ± 0.48 l.min-1 vs 5.06 ± 0.06 l.min-1; FFM: 77.5±7.7 kg, 73.5±7 kg vs 81.3±6.3 kg; and MM: 52.9±6.5 kg, 49.6±5.6 kg vs 56.1±5.8 kg. The allometric exponents (p <0.0001; R2 = 0.4) were: 0.58 for BM (95% CI: 0.45 - 0.72); 0.71 for FFM (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.90); and 0.58 for MM (95% CI: 0.43 - 0.73). Significant differences (p <0.0001) were found BR vs FR according to their anthropometric characteristics and VO2max with respect to BM and MM without allometric scaling. While the VO2max indexed by means of allometric scaling was similar between BR and FR. Conclusions: In comparative studies, the VO2max should be expressed proportional to the 0.58 power of body mass or related to FFM in order to take into account the variability in of body composition in rugby players.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英橄榄球联盟运动员最大摄氧量正常化的异速测量
生物变量与体重的关系通常以异速缩放定律为特征。本研究的目的是评估耗氧量(VO2max)作为有氧运动表现的参数与橄榄球运动员身体成分之间的关系。材料和方法:样本包括西班牙橄榄球队的107名男性。年龄:25.1±3.4岁;体重(BM): 89.8±11.7 kg,身高:182.4±6.5 cm;52名后卫(BR)和55名前锋(FR)。最大耗氧量(VO2max, l.min-1)在渐进式负荷的跑步机运动试验中测量。进行人体测量以估计无脂质量(FFM)和肌肉质量(MM)。异速生长指数b由方程y = a * xb确定;其中“y”为VO2max,“x”为相应的质量(BM, FFM或MM),“a”为一个常数。结果:VO2max为4.87±0.56 l.min-1, BR vs FR, 4.67±0.48 l.min-1 vs 5.06±0.06 l.min-1;FFM: 77.5±7.7 kg, 73.5±7 kg vs 81.3±6.3 kg;MM: 52.9±6.5 kg, 49.6±5.6 kg vs 56.1±5.8 kg。异速生长指数(p <0.0001;R2 = 0.4): BM为0.58 (95% CI: 0.45 - 0.72);FFM为0.71 (95% CI: 0.53 - 0.90);MM为0.58 (95% CI: 0.43 - 0.73)。根据他们的人体测量特征和相对于BM和MM的VO2max, BR和FR在无异速缩放时存在显著差异(p <0.0001)。结论:在比较研究中,为了考虑橄榄球运动员身体组成的可变性,VO2max应与体重的0.58次方成正比或与FFM相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of maximal oxygen uptake pre- and post-COVID-19 in elite footballers in Argentina A systematic review on the application of Aikido as a psychosomatic tool in therapeutic setting (Part I) The pre-participation physical evaluation: fact or fiction? Adductor functionality and strength in high-level rink hockey players Hemodynamic and motion demands of soccer referees: a comparison between series A and B of the State Championship of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1