‘A veto for the government’: the Money Message as a foil to new legislation

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Irish Political Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1080/07907184.2021.1928083
L. Fitzgerald, Paul Tobin
{"title":"‘A veto for the government’: the Money Message as a foil to new legislation","authors":"L. Fitzgerald, Paul Tobin","doi":"10.1080/07907184.2021.1928083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Veto players hold the capacity to decline a choice being made, making them powerful actors within legislative systems. During 2016–2020, Ireland was governed by a minority government, reliant on confidence and supply votes from other parliamentarians, thus it did not hold a veto during parliamentary votes. However, if the independent Bills Office and Ceann Comhairle deemed a ‘Money Message’ would be necessary for a Private Members’ Bill (PMB), even if it had achieved majority support in the Dáil, then the government could refuse to grant one, returning veto status to the minority government. To date, research has not provided a comprehensive overview of the PMBs blocked, nor examined in detail the cases that were high-profile. Via a nested analysis, we code 79 PMBs and complement our analysis through interviews with parliamentarians whose bills were blocked. We identify eleven policy themes in the PMBs that were blocked, demonstrating that vetoing via the Money Message was a widespread phenomenon. Next, we conduct a small-n analysis of the application of Money Messages across a variety of bills. Our analysis provides the first comprehensive examination of a procedure that holds lasting implications for the legislative process, perceptions of democracy, and executive dominance over minor parties in Ireland.","PeriodicalId":45746,"journal":{"name":"Irish Political Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"103 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07907184.2021.1928083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1928083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Veto players hold the capacity to decline a choice being made, making them powerful actors within legislative systems. During 2016–2020, Ireland was governed by a minority government, reliant on confidence and supply votes from other parliamentarians, thus it did not hold a veto during parliamentary votes. However, if the independent Bills Office and Ceann Comhairle deemed a ‘Money Message’ would be necessary for a Private Members’ Bill (PMB), even if it had achieved majority support in the Dáil, then the government could refuse to grant one, returning veto status to the minority government. To date, research has not provided a comprehensive overview of the PMBs blocked, nor examined in detail the cases that were high-profile. Via a nested analysis, we code 79 PMBs and complement our analysis through interviews with parliamentarians whose bills were blocked. We identify eleven policy themes in the PMBs that were blocked, demonstrating that vetoing via the Money Message was a widespread phenomenon. Next, we conduct a small-n analysis of the application of Money Messages across a variety of bills. Our analysis provides the first comprehensive examination of a procedure that holds lasting implications for the legislative process, perceptions of democracy, and executive dominance over minor parties in Ireland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“政府的否决”:作为新立法陪衬的货币信息
摘要Veto参与者有能力拒绝正在做出的选择,这使他们成为立法体系中的强大参与者。在2016-2020年期间,爱尔兰由少数派政府执政,依靠其他议员的信任和供应选票,因此在议会投票期间没有否决权。然而,如果独立法案办公室和Ceann Comhairle认为私人议员法案(PMB)需要“金钱信息”,即使该法案在代尔获得了多数支持,政府也可以拒绝批准,将否决权交还给少数党政府。到目前为止,研究还没有提供被阻止的PMB的全面概述,也没有详细审查备受关注的案件。通过嵌套分析,我们对79个PMB进行了编码,并通过采访法案被阻止的议员来补充我们的分析。我们在被阻止的PMB中确定了11个政策主题,表明通过金钱信息进行否决是一种普遍现象。接下来,我们对Money Messages在各种账单中的应用进行了小规模分析。我们的分析首次全面审查了一项程序,该程序对爱尔兰的立法程序、民主观念和行政部门对小党派的主导地位具有持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Political Studies
Irish Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
A critical appraisal of the case for progressive unionism in Northern Ireland today Troubling rhetoric: discourse theory and Irish Republican Army narratives (1962–1972) Front and centre? Northern Irish electoral behaviour in the age of Brexit Republic of Ireland 2022 Northern Ireland 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1