The Obs-Services and their potentials for biodiversity data assessments with a test of the current reliability of photo-identification of Coleoptera in the field

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Tijdschrift voor Entomologie Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1163/22119434-bja10018
Christian Molls
{"title":"The Obs-Services and their potentials for biodiversity data assessments with a test of the current reliability of photo-identification of Coleoptera in the field","authors":"Christian Molls","doi":"10.1163/22119434-bja10018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe current reliability of species identifications by the Nature Identification API (NIA) of the app ObsIdentify is tested with a Coleoptera (Insecta) sample set from Germany. Seventy-five photographic beetle records taken with a smartphone camera under “average user” conditions are analysed in terms of correctness of the app’s identification result on various taxonomic levels, the displayed confidence level of the identification and the time until validation of the results. More than 60% of samples were identified correctly at the species level, but only 53% were validated within a month. The mechanisms by which users can upload pictures of their observations to be identified by the artificial intelligence and the validation process by experts are briefly explained. Regional specifics and further opportunities for data usage as well as currently existing problems are discussed and improvements are suggested. The expert validation of records is identified as a huge quality advantage of the Obs-Services. They are generally found to be a promising tool for lay people and professional institutions, despite still existing deficiencies such as identification failure in mutilated specimens, cryptic and rare species, doubtful species rarity ratings as well as the still insufficient capacity of validation. Experts and institutions are encouraged to volunteer as validators and collaborators.","PeriodicalId":53449,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Entomologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Entomologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119434-bja10018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current reliability of species identifications by the Nature Identification API (NIA) of the app ObsIdentify is tested with a Coleoptera (Insecta) sample set from Germany. Seventy-five photographic beetle records taken with a smartphone camera under “average user” conditions are analysed in terms of correctness of the app’s identification result on various taxonomic levels, the displayed confidence level of the identification and the time until validation of the results. More than 60% of samples were identified correctly at the species level, but only 53% were validated within a month. The mechanisms by which users can upload pictures of their observations to be identified by the artificial intelligence and the validation process by experts are briefly explained. Regional specifics and further opportunities for data usage as well as currently existing problems are discussed and improvements are suggested. The expert validation of records is identified as a huge quality advantage of the Obs-Services. They are generally found to be a promising tool for lay people and professional institutions, despite still existing deficiencies such as identification failure in mutilated specimens, cryptic and rare species, doubtful species rarity ratings as well as the still insufficient capacity of validation. Experts and institutions are encouraged to volunteer as validators and collaborators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obs服务及其在生物多样性数据评估方面的潜力,并对目前实地鞘翅目照片识别的可靠性进行测试
ObsIdentify应用程序的自然识别API(NIA)物种识别的当前可靠性是用德国的鞘翅目(昆虫)样本集进行测试的。根据应用程序在不同分类级别上的识别结果的正确性、显示的识别置信度以及验证结果的时间,分析了在“普通用户”条件下用智能手机相机拍摄的75份甲虫照片记录。超过60%的样本在物种层面上得到了正确识别,但只有53%的样本在一个月内得到了验证。简要解释了用户可以上传其观察结果的图片以供人工智能识别的机制以及专家的验证过程。讨论了区域细节和数据使用的进一步机会以及目前存在的问题,并提出了改进建议。专家对记录的验证被认为是Obs服务的一个巨大质量优势。它们通常被认为是非专业人员和专业机构的一种很有前途的工具,尽管仍然存在缺陷,如残缺标本的鉴定失败、神秘和稀有物种、物种稀有性评级存疑以及验证能力仍然不足。鼓励专家和机构自愿作为验证者和合作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor Entomologie
Tijdschrift voor Entomologie Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Tijdschrift voor Entomologie is a peer reviewed journal for systematic and evolutionary entomology. The journal welcomes submissions on taxonomy of insects, other hexapods, arachnids or myriapods, especially when placed in a broader evolutionary context. There is no geographical restriction.
期刊最新文献
Four new species of the plant bug subfamily Phylinae from Taiwan (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae) New taxa and nomenclatorial acts in volume 166 Annual index volume 166, 2023 On Taxonomy. Reflections on the Usefulness of a ‘Non-Modern’ Science The first new species of Leptelmis Sharp, 1888 (Coleoptera, Elmidae) from the Philippines in the last 50 years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1