Mid Shaft Clavicle Fractures- Plate vs Titanium Elastic Nail System

Suryakanth Kalluraya, A. Hosangadi, S. Í., Nagendra Prasad M
{"title":"Mid Shaft Clavicle Fractures- Plate vs Titanium Elastic Nail System","authors":"Suryakanth Kalluraya, A. Hosangadi, S. Í., Nagendra Prasad M","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1003.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n It was believed that “all clavicle fractures heal well” is no longer valid. Recent trend is towards operative management, consists of Pre-contoured plate or Titanium Elastic Nail System(TENS) application. Plate fixation remains the mainstay of treatment but Titanium Elastic Nail System application has gained attention in recent years. This study highlights the comparison between two most common modalities available for treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures.\n \n Objectives:Compare the functional outcome using Neer’s scoring system, radiological outcome and secondary outcomes between two treatment groups.\n \n Methods:Patients satisfying inclusion criteria were included in our study and randomized into Group A-operated with plate fixation and Group B-operated with TENS. Routine postoperative protocol and physiotherapy followed. Regular follow up carried out and assessed as per protocol.\n \n Results: We had 15 patients in each group by end of our study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographics, time to surgery, fracture types. Duration of hospital stay, mean fracture union time were significantly shorter and cosmetically more satisfied in TENS group. Operative time, length of incision, peri-operative blood loss was significantly higher in plate group and length of clavicle better restored. Functional outcome was excellent with no significant difference between two groups.\n \n Conclusion:Both methods return the patients to their pre-injury functional levels without significant complications with excellent functional outcome. Titanium Elastic Nail System application has a shorter operative time, lesser duration of hospital stay, lower infection rate and better cosmetic outcome suggesting this is the preferred method with no comminution whereas plate fixation is superior in comminuted fractures.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1003.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract It was believed that “all clavicle fractures heal well” is no longer valid. Recent trend is towards operative management, consists of Pre-contoured plate or Titanium Elastic Nail System(TENS) application. Plate fixation remains the mainstay of treatment but Titanium Elastic Nail System application has gained attention in recent years. This study highlights the comparison between two most common modalities available for treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Objectives:Compare the functional outcome using Neer’s scoring system, radiological outcome and secondary outcomes between two treatment groups. Methods:Patients satisfying inclusion criteria were included in our study and randomized into Group A-operated with plate fixation and Group B-operated with TENS. Routine postoperative protocol and physiotherapy followed. Regular follow up carried out and assessed as per protocol. Results: We had 15 patients in each group by end of our study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographics, time to surgery, fracture types. Duration of hospital stay, mean fracture union time were significantly shorter and cosmetically more satisfied in TENS group. Operative time, length of incision, peri-operative blood loss was significantly higher in plate group and length of clavicle better restored. Functional outcome was excellent with no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion:Both methods return the patients to their pre-injury functional levels without significant complications with excellent functional outcome. Titanium Elastic Nail System application has a shorter operative time, lesser duration of hospital stay, lower infection rate and better cosmetic outcome suggesting this is the preferred method with no comminution whereas plate fixation is superior in comminuted fractures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中轴锁骨骨折-钢板与钛弹性钉系统
摘要以往认为“锁骨骨折愈合良好”的说法已不成立。最近的趋势是手术治疗,包括预塑形钢板或钛弹性钉系统(TENS)的应用。钢板固定仍然是主要的治疗方法,但钛弹性钉系统的应用近年来得到了重视。本研究强调了两种最常见的治疗中骨干锁骨骨折的方法的比较。目的:用Neer评分系统比较两个治疗组的功能结局、放射学结局和次要结局。方法:将符合纳入标准的患者随机分为a组钢板固定组和b组TENS组。术后常规治疗及物理治疗。根据协议进行定期跟进和评估。结果:研究结束时,每组15例。两组在人口统计学,手术时间,骨折类型方面没有显著差异。TENS组患者住院时间、平均骨折愈合时间显著缩短,美容满意度显著提高。钢板组手术时间、切口长度、围术期出血量均明显高于钢板组,锁骨长度恢复较好。两组的功能结局非常好,无显著差异。结论:两种方法均可使患者恢复损伤前的功能水平,无明显并发症,功能预后良好。应用钛弹性钉系统具有手术时间短、住院时间短、感染率低、美观效果好等优点,提示这是无粉碎性骨折的首选方法,而在粉碎性骨折中钢板固定更为优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of peripheral lymph node tuberculosis: a prospective study of 24 cases Histopathological study on the spectrum of various sinonasal lesions Socio-demographic correlates and psychosocial stressors among suicide attempters attending a tertiary care general hospital Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1