Development and pilot-testing of a behavioural intervention to enhance physical activity in patients admitted to the cardiology ward: a proof-of-concept study

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION European Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.1080/21679169.2021.1949038
Kathrin Scholz, R. van Oorsouw, S. Hermsen, T. Hoogeboom
{"title":"Development and pilot-testing of a behavioural intervention to enhance physical activity in patients admitted to the cardiology ward: a proof-of-concept study","authors":"Kathrin Scholz, R. van Oorsouw, S. Hermsen, T. Hoogeboom","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2021.1949038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose To examine the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in patients admitted to the cardiology ward. Methods In this proof-of concept study, we developed an intervention supporting self-efficacy and diminishing inertia by means of autonomy support and action planning. Data collection took place from April till July 2018, including a three-week intervention period. Feasibility was assessed with a semi-structured interview among patients (n = 34), a survey among nurses (n = 20), and a focus group among physical therapists (n = 4). Potential effectiveness was assessed as change in action planning, autonomy support and self-efficacy (determined using psychological questionnaires) in 30 patients, and change in physical activity (determined using behavioural mapping) before (n = 90) and after (n = 83) implementation. Results Feasibility of the behavioural intervention was deemed adequate by patients, nurses and physical therapists. Potential effectiveness was demonstrated by an increase in action planning (mean difference: 1.76; 95%-CI: 0.92–2.60), autonomy support (0.84; 0.35–1.34) and self-efficacy (0.57; 0.11–1.03). Patients in the after-group spent less time lying down (-5.96; −8.86 to −2.86) and more time standing/walking (3.34; 1.82–4.87). Conclusion The developed behavioural intervention appears to be feasible in daily clinical practice and may enhance relevant psychological determinants and physical activity in patients admitted to the cardiology ward.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"25 1","pages":"13 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21679169.2021.1949038","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2021.1949038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To examine the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in patients admitted to the cardiology ward. Methods In this proof-of concept study, we developed an intervention supporting self-efficacy and diminishing inertia by means of autonomy support and action planning. Data collection took place from April till July 2018, including a three-week intervention period. Feasibility was assessed with a semi-structured interview among patients (n = 34), a survey among nurses (n = 20), and a focus group among physical therapists (n = 4). Potential effectiveness was assessed as change in action planning, autonomy support and self-efficacy (determined using psychological questionnaires) in 30 patients, and change in physical activity (determined using behavioural mapping) before (n = 90) and after (n = 83) implementation. Results Feasibility of the behavioural intervention was deemed adequate by patients, nurses and physical therapists. Potential effectiveness was demonstrated by an increase in action planning (mean difference: 1.76; 95%-CI: 0.92–2.60), autonomy support (0.84; 0.35–1.34) and self-efficacy (0.57; 0.11–1.03). Patients in the after-group spent less time lying down (-5.96; −8.86 to −2.86) and more time standing/walking (3.34; 1.82–4.87). Conclusion The developed behavioural intervention appears to be feasible in daily clinical practice and may enhance relevant psychological determinants and physical activity in patients admitted to the cardiology ward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和试点测试的行为干预,以加强身体活动的病人住进心脏病病房:概念验证研究
目的探讨行为干预增加心内科住院患者身体活动的可行性和潜在有效性。方法在本概念验证研究中,我们通过自主支持和行动计划开发了一种支持自我效能和减少惯性的干预措施。数据收集于2018年4月至7月进行,包括为期三周的干预期。通过对患者(n = 34)的半结构化访谈、对护士(n = 20)的调查和对物理治疗师(n = 4)的焦点小组来评估可行性。在实施前(n = 90)和实施后(n = 83),评估了30名患者在行动计划、自主支持和自我效能(使用心理问卷确定)以及身体活动(使用行为测绘确定)方面的变化。结果患者、护士和物理治疗师均认为行为干预的可行性是充分的。通过增加行动计划来证明潜在的有效性(平均差:1.76;95%-CI: 0.92-2.60),自主支持(0.84;0.35-1.34)和自我效能感(0.57;0.11 - -1.03)。术后组患者躺卧时间较少(-5.96;−8.86至−2.86),站立/行走时间增加(3.34;1.82 - -4.87)。结论所建立的行为干预在日常临床实践中是可行的,可以增强心内科住院患者的相关心理决定因素和身体活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey. Unravelling the digital competence of students in physiotherapy education through the European digital competence framework Complementary strategies to improve the qualitative analysis: exemplified by our studies of physiotherapy in shoulder problems Beyond one size fits All - Personalised prevention strategies using physical activity: editorial Comparing treadmill and overground versions of the two-minute walk test in people with low back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1