Indwelling catheter patient experiences and the potential usability and acceptance of the T-Control® prototype urinary catheter

A. Toledo-Chavarri PhD, A. Bassas-Parga Bsc, S. Endrenyi Msc, M. Luque Bsc, C. Bezos-Daleske PhD, V. Reyero MSc, P. Serrano-Aguilar PhD, J. E. Batista-Miranda PhD
{"title":"Indwelling catheter patient experiences and the potential usability and acceptance of the T-Control® prototype urinary catheter","authors":"A. Toledo-Chavarri PhD,&nbsp;A. Bassas-Parga Bsc,&nbsp;S. Endrenyi Msc,&nbsp;M. Luque Bsc,&nbsp;C. Bezos-Daleske PhD,&nbsp;V. Reyero MSc,&nbsp;P. Serrano-Aguilar PhD,&nbsp;J. E. Batista-Miranda PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to analyse the experience of users of indwelling bladder catheters and evaluate the anticipated usability of a prototype of the T-Control® urinary catheter (without being inserted) by patients who were able to compare the differences between the T-Control® prototype and other urinary catheters and urinary catheter accessories. A qualitative study was conducted with people who had lived with an indwelling urinary catheter for at least 1 week. Two user-centred design techniques were applied: patient experience trajectory map and <i>Think Aloud,</i> a method where the participants were able to express their previous experiences, expectations and preferences while manipulating the devices. The experiential trajectory was collected based on a semi-structured following interviews. Participants were able to manipulate the new T-Control® and, based on their previous experiences, compare the potential usability of T-control® with Foley-type catheter and its accessories All the participants stated that they had experienced negative emotions concerning bladder catheterisation during the trajectory of use, from the initial prescription and adaptation to the follow-up, and the forced life changes that a permanent catheterisation implies. The most frequent emotions were rejection and sadness. The new T-Control® device could potentially improve the patient experience, as all participants perceived advantages related to the closure system, ease of use, safety and discretion. Participants also noted its closure system as an advantage and highlighted its ease of use, although one-handed operation required some learning. Catheters currently on the market are functional, but some patients do not always have a satisfactory experience. This might negatively affect their quality of life, so there is a wide market opportunity for new devices that improve clinical and psychological care. Based on patient evaluation, the new T-Control® device with a built-in valve could provide benefits for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 3","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijun.12362","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the experience of users of indwelling bladder catheters and evaluate the anticipated usability of a prototype of the T-Control® urinary catheter (without being inserted) by patients who were able to compare the differences between the T-Control® prototype and other urinary catheters and urinary catheter accessories. A qualitative study was conducted with people who had lived with an indwelling urinary catheter for at least 1 week. Two user-centred design techniques were applied: patient experience trajectory map and Think Aloud, a method where the participants were able to express their previous experiences, expectations and preferences while manipulating the devices. The experiential trajectory was collected based on a semi-structured following interviews. Participants were able to manipulate the new T-Control® and, based on their previous experiences, compare the potential usability of T-control® with Foley-type catheter and its accessories All the participants stated that they had experienced negative emotions concerning bladder catheterisation during the trajectory of use, from the initial prescription and adaptation to the follow-up, and the forced life changes that a permanent catheterisation implies. The most frequent emotions were rejection and sadness. The new T-Control® device could potentially improve the patient experience, as all participants perceived advantages related to the closure system, ease of use, safety and discretion. Participants also noted its closure system as an advantage and highlighted its ease of use, although one-handed operation required some learning. Catheters currently on the market are functional, but some patients do not always have a satisfactory experience. This might negatively affect their quality of life, so there is a wide market opportunity for new devices that improve clinical and psychological care. Based on patient evaluation, the new T-Control® device with a built-in valve could provide benefits for patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T - Control®原型导尿管的留置病人体验和潜在的可用性和接受度
本研究的目的是分析留置导尿管使用者的体验,并评估T-Control®原型导尿管(不插入)的预期可用性,这些患者能够比较T-Control®原型导尿管与其他导尿管和导尿管配件之间的差异。对留置导尿至少1周的患者进行了定性研究。应用了两种以用户为中心的设计技术:患者体验轨迹图和Think Aloud,一种参与者在操作设备时能够表达他们以前的经验、期望和偏好的方法。经验轨迹是基于半结构化的后续访谈收集的。参与者能够操作新的T-Control®,并根据他们以前的经验,比较T-Control®与foley型导尿管及其附件的潜在可用性。所有参与者都表示,他们在使用过程中经历过关于膀胱导尿的负面情绪,从最初的处方和适应到随访,以及永久导尿所带来的强制性生活变化。最常见的情绪是拒绝和悲伤。新的T-Control®设备可能潜在地改善患者体验,因为所有参与者都认为闭合系统、易用性、安全性和自由裁量权相关的优势。与会者还指出,它的关闭系统是一个优点,并强调它易于使用,尽管单手操作需要一些学习。目前市场上的导管是功能性的,但一些患者并不总是有满意的体验。这可能会对他们的生活质量产生负面影响,因此,改善临床和心理护理的新设备有广阔的市场机会。根据患者的评估,带有内置瓣膜的新型T-Control®设备可以为患者提供益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1