Taming the Infallible People: Sensus Fidei, Democracy, and Populism

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Political Theology Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.1080/1462317X.2022.2157578
Juan Pablo Aranda
{"title":"Taming the Infallible People: Sensus Fidei, Democracy, and Populism","authors":"Juan Pablo Aranda","doi":"10.1080/1462317X.2022.2157578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A structural correspondence is found between the process whereby Catholicism prevents the infallibility of the people of God (sensus fidei) from becoming schismatic by appealing to the final authority of the magisterium, and the way democracy disables the immediate power of the acclaiming people, opposing the People’s direct participation by means of the mediation of a variety of institutions. The exigency of an unmediated, individual access to God’s voice found in both Pentecostalism and the Prosperity Gospel, on the other hand, is structurally analogous to the populist rejection of the symbolic character of the democratic “People” and the rejection of any mediation between the faction-people and the gifts of the Spirit.","PeriodicalId":43759,"journal":{"name":"Political Theology","volume":"24 1","pages":"570 - 588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2022.2157578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT A structural correspondence is found between the process whereby Catholicism prevents the infallibility of the people of God (sensus fidei) from becoming schismatic by appealing to the final authority of the magisterium, and the way democracy disables the immediate power of the acclaiming people, opposing the People’s direct participation by means of the mediation of a variety of institutions. The exigency of an unmediated, individual access to God’s voice found in both Pentecostalism and the Prosperity Gospel, on the other hand, is structurally analogous to the populist rejection of the symbolic character of the democratic “People” and the rejection of any mediation between the faction-people and the gifts of the Spirit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驯服不听话的人:费代、民主和民粹主义
摘要天主教通过诉诸权威机构的最终权威来防止上帝的子民(感性信仰)的绝对正确性变得分裂,而民主则削弱了被赞美的子民的直接权力,反对人民通过各种机构的调解直接参与。另一方面,在五旬节主义和繁荣福音中发现的无中介、个人接触上帝声音的迫切性,在结构上类似于民粹主义者对民主“人民”象征性特征的拒绝,以及对派系人民与圣灵礼物之间的任何调解的拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Political Theology
Political Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊最新文献
The Blue Horse of Poetry. Decolonial Poetics, Transsecular Reading, and Ecocritical Affinities in Elicura Chihuailaf Is Literature Secular? Transsecular Politics of Literature and Hermeneutics of Hospitality Rome Better Than Christ: Levinas’s (Negative) Political Theology Black Surfeit, Black Grief: Not of Meaning nor Measure Negating Futures: Race, Queerness and the Force of the Negative in David Marriott’s Psychopolitics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1