New measure of catastrophic health expenditures with application on rural Egypt

IF 0.9 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Middle East Development Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17938120.2021.1958560
Suzan Abdel-Rahman, M. Abonazel
{"title":"New measure of catastrophic health expenditures with application on rural Egypt","authors":"Suzan Abdel-Rahman, M. Abonazel","doi":"10.1080/17938120.2021.1958560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reducing Out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments is an essential element to protect households from financial risks and eradicate extreme poverty. This paper aimed to provide a new approach for measuring catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) by redefining subsistence spending to comprise the minimum acceptable level of all necessities. The new approach defined OOP health expenditures as catastrophic payments if they undermine a household’s ability to maintain essential needs that are not limited to food needs as assumed by the Capacity to pay (CTP) approach. The equivalence scale is estimated to reflect the dominant consumption patterns and the Cost of Basic Need Approach (CBN) is employed to measure the subsistence spending. We estimated the burden of OOP health payment on household living standards in rural Egypt using data from Household Income, Expenditure, and Consumption Survey in 2015. Rural areas exhibited a considerable incidence of catastrophic payments. Redefining subsistence spending better detected the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure among poor households. The distribution of CHE became highly regressive and demonstrated that catastrophic payments are more concentrated among poor households. Although poor households have incurred relatively small health payments compared to wealthy ones, this has threatened their standard of living. The highest incidence rates of CHE were also observed among uneducated, unemployed, female, elderly heads, among households with chronically ill members, and those who experienced outpatient services. The poor performance of the health insurance system in protecting vulnerable groups from catastrophic payments creates a critical need to redesign its policies and improve its service quality.","PeriodicalId":43862,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Development Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17938120.2021.1958560","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2021.1958560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reducing Out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments is an essential element to protect households from financial risks and eradicate extreme poverty. This paper aimed to provide a new approach for measuring catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) by redefining subsistence spending to comprise the minimum acceptable level of all necessities. The new approach defined OOP health expenditures as catastrophic payments if they undermine a household’s ability to maintain essential needs that are not limited to food needs as assumed by the Capacity to pay (CTP) approach. The equivalence scale is estimated to reflect the dominant consumption patterns and the Cost of Basic Need Approach (CBN) is employed to measure the subsistence spending. We estimated the burden of OOP health payment on household living standards in rural Egypt using data from Household Income, Expenditure, and Consumption Survey in 2015. Rural areas exhibited a considerable incidence of catastrophic payments. Redefining subsistence spending better detected the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure among poor households. The distribution of CHE became highly regressive and demonstrated that catastrophic payments are more concentrated among poor households. Although poor households have incurred relatively small health payments compared to wealthy ones, this has threatened their standard of living. The highest incidence rates of CHE were also observed among uneducated, unemployed, female, elderly heads, among households with chronically ill members, and those who experienced outpatient services. The poor performance of the health insurance system in protecting vulnerable groups from catastrophic payments creates a critical need to redesign its policies and improve its service quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾难性卫生支出的新措施及其在埃及农村的应用
摘要减少自付医疗费用是保护家庭免受金融风险和消除极端贫困的重要因素。本文旨在通过重新定义生活支出以包括所有必需品的最低可接受水平,为衡量灾难性卫生支出(CHE)提供一种新的方法。新方法将OOP医疗支出定义为灾难性支出,如果这些支出破坏了家庭维持基本需求的能力,而这些需求不限于支付能力方法所假设的粮食需求。等值量表被估计为反映主要消费模式,基本需求成本法(CBN)被用来衡量生活支出。我们使用2015年家庭收入、支出和消费调查的数据,估计了OOP健康支付对埃及农村家庭生活水平的负担。农村地区出现了相当多的灾难性付款。重新定义生活支出可以更好地发现贫困家庭灾难性医疗支出的发生率。CHE的分布具有高度的递减性,表明灾难性支付更多地集中在贫困家庭中。尽管与富裕家庭相比,贫困家庭的医疗费用相对较少,但这威胁到了他们的生活水平。CHE的发病率最高的人群还有未受过教育的人、失业者、女性、老年户主、有慢性病成员的家庭以及有门诊服务的人。医疗保险系统在保护弱势群体免受灾难性付款方面表现不佳,迫切需要重新设计其政策并提高其服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Development Journal
Middle East Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The impact of sanctions on household welfare and employment in Iran Tunisia’s economic development: why better than most in the Middle East but not East Asia authors: Mustapha K. Nabli and Jeffrey B. Nugent Who can work from home in MENA? Overeducation wage penalty for university graduates: evidence from the MENA region using machine learning techniques Does the structure of state budget matter for Egypt’s fiscal deficit? An empirical investigation using an ARDL bounds testing approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1