Incidence, Risk Factors, and Patient Management of Incidental Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-ECG Gated Computed Chest Tomography: A Systematic Review

Rohanlal Vishwanath, S. Gorgis, Varinder P. Singh, James Iordanou, H. Papukhyan, A. Hana, Cori E. Russell, K. Ananthasubramaniam
{"title":"Incidence, Risk Factors, and Patient Management of Incidental Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-ECG Gated Computed Chest Tomography: A Systematic Review","authors":"Rohanlal Vishwanath, S. Gorgis, Varinder P. Singh, James Iordanou, H. Papukhyan, A. Hana, Cori E. Russell, K. Ananthasubramaniam","doi":"10.33425/2639-8486.1119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and can be reliably detected on non-Electrocardiogram (ECG) gated computed tomography (CT) scans. The increased use of CT has made CAC a common incidental finding, although the frequency remains variable in published literature. We aimed to identify the incidence of CAC found on routine non-ECG gated CT scans, risk factors associated with these findings, and management outcomes that resulted from discovery of CAC. A systematic review was conducted through literature search using predetermined search criteria. Applicable studies were screened by 3 investigators for eligibility. Data regarding indication for CT imaging, presence of CAC, cardiovascular risk factors, and management outcomes was collected. A total of 3585 study subjects were included for review. CAC was found in 31.2% (n = 1118) patients. Indications for CT imaging were 33.0% lung cancer screening, 16.0% for intrapulmonary pathology, and 50.0% for other reasons. In patients with CAC, the average age was 61.5 + 8.8 years old, 77.2% were male, 41.4% were smokers, 32.2% had hypertension, 31.5% had hyperlipidemia, and 11.2% had diabetes. Patients with CAC were older (p < 0.001), more likely to be smokers (p = 0.002), and more likely to have hyperlipidemia (p < 0.001). The presence of CAC in reports did not significantly alter management plans. In conclusion, traditional cardiovascular risk factors are associated with incidental CAC. Not reporting incidental CAC is a missed opportunity for identification of patient at increased risk of cardiovascular events in the community.","PeriodicalId":72522,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology & vascular research (Wilmington, Del.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology & vascular research (Wilmington, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-8486.1119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and can be reliably detected on non-Electrocardiogram (ECG) gated computed tomography (CT) scans. The increased use of CT has made CAC a common incidental finding, although the frequency remains variable in published literature. We aimed to identify the incidence of CAC found on routine non-ECG gated CT scans, risk factors associated with these findings, and management outcomes that resulted from discovery of CAC. A systematic review was conducted through literature search using predetermined search criteria. Applicable studies were screened by 3 investigators for eligibility. Data regarding indication for CT imaging, presence of CAC, cardiovascular risk factors, and management outcomes was collected. A total of 3585 study subjects were included for review. CAC was found in 31.2% (n = 1118) patients. Indications for CT imaging were 33.0% lung cancer screening, 16.0% for intrapulmonary pathology, and 50.0% for other reasons. In patients with CAC, the average age was 61.5 + 8.8 years old, 77.2% were male, 41.4% were smokers, 32.2% had hypertension, 31.5% had hyperlipidemia, and 11.2% had diabetes. Patients with CAC were older (p < 0.001), more likely to be smokers (p = 0.002), and more likely to have hyperlipidemia (p < 0.001). The presence of CAC in reports did not significantly alter management plans. In conclusion, traditional cardiovascular risk factors are associated with incidental CAC. Not reporting incidental CAC is a missed opportunity for identification of patient at increased risk of cardiovascular events in the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非心电图门控计算机胸部断层扫描并发冠状动脉钙化的发生率、危险因素和患者管理:一项系统综述
冠状动脉钙化(CAC)是心血管事件的独立预测因子,可以在非心电图(ECG)门控计算机断层扫描(CT)上可靠地检测到。CT使用的增加使CAC成为一种常见的偶然发现,尽管在已发表的文献中其频率仍然可变。我们的目的是确定在常规非心电图门控CT扫描中发现的CAC的发生率、与这些发现相关的风险因素以及CAC发现后的管理结果。采用预先确定的检索标准,通过文献检索进行系统综述。3名研究人员对适用研究进行了资格筛选。收集了有关CT成像适应症、CAC存在、心血管危险因素和治疗结果的数据。共纳入3585名研究受试者进行审查。在31.2%(n=1118)的患者中发现CAC。CT成像的适应症为33.0%的癌症筛查,16.0%的肺部病理,50.0%的其他原因。CAC患者的平均年龄为61.5+8.8岁,77.2%为男性,41.4%为吸烟者,32.2%为高血压,31.5%为高脂血症,11.2%为糖尿病。CAC患者年龄较大(p<0.001),更容易吸烟(p=0.002),更可能患有高脂血症(p<001)。报告中CAC的存在并没有显著改变管理计划。总之,传统的心血管危险因素与偶发CAC有关。不报告偶发CAC是错过了在社区中识别心血管事件风险增加的患者的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stroke Subtypes, Risk Factors and Treatment Outcomes at A Tertiary Hospital Situated in Rural Southwestern Nigeria: A Five- Year Restrospective Observational Study Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Components among EarlyAge onset Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Bangladesh Aortic Dissection Involving a Right Retroesophagian Subclaviary Artery (LUSORIA) Associated with a Bi-Carotidian Trunk: About a Case at the National University Hospital Center of Fann (Sénégal) Use of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain to predict Reverse Left Ventricular Remodeling after MitraClip Repair Can Early Diagnosis - Treatment of A Hemodynamically Significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus Reduce the Incidence of Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Extreme Low Birth Weight Infants?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1