At the Beginning There Was…– Re-Considering the Concepts of ‘Faith’ and ‘Trust’ as Analytic Objects

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Contemporary Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00107530.2021.2004049
Ofrit Shapira-Berman
{"title":"At the Beginning There Was…– Re-Considering the Concepts of ‘Faith’ and ‘Trust’ as Analytic Objects","authors":"Ofrit Shapira-Berman","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2021.2004049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article proposes a distinction between “faith” and “trust,” within psychoanalysis. It puts forth the idea that one’s faith might be thought of as an inborn quality that promotes the feeling that the future holds within it more possibilities than those already encountered and allows the individual to develop and move forward. On the other hand, trust is an acquired quality, shaped within the mother-infant dyad, and is experience-based. Both trust and faith play a significant role in a patient’s ability to use their analysis to better their lives, albeit each holds a different function, complementary to one another. The author suggests that “there is no such thing as a patient” (apart from the analyst’s faith). The analyst’s capacity to have faith in the patient’s possibilities holds, within it, the dialectic tension between oneness (faith) and twoness (trust), acting as an “alpha function of faith.”","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"57 1","pages":"506 - 536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2021.2004049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article proposes a distinction between “faith” and “trust,” within psychoanalysis. It puts forth the idea that one’s faith might be thought of as an inborn quality that promotes the feeling that the future holds within it more possibilities than those already encountered and allows the individual to develop and move forward. On the other hand, trust is an acquired quality, shaped within the mother-infant dyad, and is experience-based. Both trust and faith play a significant role in a patient’s ability to use their analysis to better their lives, albeit each holds a different function, complementary to one another. The author suggests that “there is no such thing as a patient” (apart from the analyst’s faith). The analyst’s capacity to have faith in the patient’s possibilities holds, within it, the dialectic tension between oneness (faith) and twoness (trust), acting as an “alpha function of faith.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最初有…——重新思考“信仰”和“信任”作为分析对象的概念
本文提出了精神分析中“信仰”和“信任”的区别。它提出了一种观点,即一个人的信仰可能被认为是一种天生的品质,它促进了一种感觉,即未来拥有比已经遇到的更多的可能性,并允许个人发展和前进。另一方面,信任是一种后天习得的品质,是在母婴关系中形成的,是基于经验的。信任和信念都在病人利用他们的分析改善生活的能力中发挥着重要作用,尽管它们各自具有不同的功能,相互补充。作者认为“没有病人这种东西”(除了精神分析师的信仰)。精神分析师对病人的可能性抱有信心的能力,在其中,一(信心)和二(信任)之间的辩证张力,作为“信心的阿尔法函数”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
What Happens When We Talk to Each Other: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Race and Other Difficult Conversations A Fresh Beginning to an Old Conversation: Thoughts on Leon Hoffman’s “We Don’t Trust YOU: Reflections on Anti-Racism in Psychoanalysis” Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places: Hatred as a Conflict Between Dependency and the Pseudo-Autonomous Self Surviving Hating and Being Hated On “Othering”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1