Stress ulcer prophylaxis use in critical care units at public hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa

IF 0.8 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Southern African Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2021-03-17 DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i1.439
N. Biyase, H. Perrie, J. Scribante, M. Muteba, S. Chetty
{"title":"Stress ulcer prophylaxis use in critical care units at public hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa","authors":"N. Biyase, H. Perrie, J. Scribante, M. Muteba, S. Chetty","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i1.439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is part of the management of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, inappropriate use of these drugs has important clinical implications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal tract infections. The overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as SUP is a rapidly growing problem globally. Objectives To describe the use of SUP in three selected ICUs in Johannesburg, South Africa (SA). Methods A retrospective, descriptive, contextual study design was used. Data were collected from ICU records of adult patients admitted into these units during the study period (1 August 2013 - 31 October 2013). Results A total of 174 patients were included in the study. Of these, 156 were on SUP and only 38.5% (n=60/156) were appropriately treated with SUP according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines. There was an inappropriate use of SUP in over 50% of those who were treated. The most frequently prescribed SUP was histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) (51.3%; n=80/156), followed by PPIs (30.8%; n=48/156), sucralfate (17.3%; n=27/156), and a combination of PPI and H2RA (0.6%; n=1/156). Conclusion The study demonstrated overuse of SUP. The most commonly used drug for SUP was H2RA and not PPIs. This study demonstrates that the problem of SUP overuse internationally also exists locally. The development of local guidelines may help to improve the practice of SUP in SA. Contributions of the study This study showed overuse of SUP and should encourage doctors to critically evaluate why they prescribe SUP and whether it is really indicated. This should help in the adoption of practices towards appropriate use of SUP.","PeriodicalId":42653,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2021.v37i1.439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is part of the management of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, inappropriate use of these drugs has important clinical implications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal tract infections. The overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as SUP is a rapidly growing problem globally. Objectives To describe the use of SUP in three selected ICUs in Johannesburg, South Africa (SA). Methods A retrospective, descriptive, contextual study design was used. Data were collected from ICU records of adult patients admitted into these units during the study period (1 August 2013 - 31 October 2013). Results A total of 174 patients were included in the study. Of these, 156 were on SUP and only 38.5% (n=60/156) were appropriately treated with SUP according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines. There was an inappropriate use of SUP in over 50% of those who were treated. The most frequently prescribed SUP was histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) (51.3%; n=80/156), followed by PPIs (30.8%; n=48/156), sucralfate (17.3%; n=27/156), and a combination of PPI and H2RA (0.6%; n=1/156). Conclusion The study demonstrated overuse of SUP. The most commonly used drug for SUP was H2RA and not PPIs. This study demonstrates that the problem of SUP overuse internationally also exists locally. The development of local guidelines may help to improve the practice of SUP in SA. Contributions of the study This study showed overuse of SUP and should encourage doctors to critically evaluate why they prescribe SUP and whether it is really indicated. This should help in the adoption of practices towards appropriate use of SUP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非约翰内斯堡公立医院重症监护室应激性溃疡预防应用
背景应激性溃疡预防(SUP)是重症监护室(ICU)危重患者管理的一部分。然而,这些药物的不当使用具有重要的临床意义,如呼吸机相关肺炎和艰难梭菌相关胃肠道感染。过度使用质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)作为SUP是全球范围内一个迅速增长的问题。目的描述南非约翰内斯堡选定的三个重症监护室使用SUP的情况。方法采用回顾性、描述性、情境性研究设计。数据来自研究期间(2013年8月1日至2013年10月31日)入住这些病房的成年患者的ICU记录。结果本研究共纳入174例患者。根据美国卫生系统药剂师协会的指导方针,其中156人接受了SUP治疗,只有38.5%(n=60/156)接受了适当的SUP治疗。在接受治疗的患者中,超过50%的患者不恰当地使用了SUP。最常用的SUP是组胺-2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)(51.3%;n=80/156),其次是PPI(30.8%;n=48/156)、硫糖铝(17.3%;n=27/156)以及PPI和H2RA的组合(0.6%;n=1/156)。结论本研究证实了SUP的过度使用。治疗SUP最常用的药物是H2RA,而不是PPIs。这项研究表明,国际上SUP过度使用的问题在当地也存在。制定当地指南可能有助于改善SA的SUP实践。该研究的贡献表明,SUP过度使用,应鼓励医生严格评估他们为什么开SUP以及是否真的适用。这应有助于采用适当使用SUP的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes scientific articles related to multidisciplinary critical and intensive medical care and the emergency care of critically ill humans.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients in an adult intensive care unit of a South African regional hospital, without on-site neurosurgical service: A retrospective quantitative study on the neurological improvement at discharge Groote Schuur Hospital neurosurgical intensive care unit: A 2-year review of admission characteristics Deep medicine ...  Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine Core competencies in critical care for general medical practitioners in South Africa: A Delphi study Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: ‘Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged ... ’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1