A time series analysis of household income inequality in Brazil 1977 to 2013

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Revista Brasileira de Economia Pub Date : 2019-12-19 DOI:10.5935/0034-7140.20190021
Marcel Caparoz, Emerson Fernandes Marçal, Enlinson Mattos
{"title":"A time series analysis of household income inequality in Brazil 1977 to 2013","authors":"Marcel Caparoz, Emerson Fernandes Marçal, Enlinson Mattos","doi":"10.5935/0034-7140.20190021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyses the evolution of household income inequality in Brazil from 1977 and 2013 using Brazilian National Household Survey data at aggregated and regional levels. Four income shares quantiles are analyzed: Top 1%, Top 10%, Bottom 10% and Bottom 50%. The novelty of our study is to use time series techniques to understand the phenomenon of income inequality within this period. We use Markov-Switching Regime Change Model (Hamilton (1989)) and State Space Unobservable Model (Harvey (1990)) techniques. Both strategies suggest that income concentration periods are related to low growth rates but high inflation rates as opposed to many developed countries (Piketty and Saez (2014)). Results from Markov-switching models suggest a detection of a new regime during first decade of 2000's in poorest quantiles (bottom 10% and 50%) increasing their correspondent income shares. Moreover a regime of low shares started to prevail at the same time for Top 10% whereas for those at the Top 1% had prevailed a concentrated income share regime during eighties and nineties. We argue that Brazilian macroeconomic instability helped to produce a regime of low income shares at the bottom of the distribution. Our results suggest that recent inequality reduction in the shares of top 1% quantile can be seen as a “back to normality” instead of “a new era” whereas significant changes can be seen in other quantiles. State space models results also suggests that macroeconomic of the eighties had a severe effects on Brazilian inequality whereas the dynamics of Top 1% income shares reinforce the return of 70's level considering aggregated data. Last, our estimates unveil important regional differences in many quantiles mainly on the low brackets where poorer regions seem to have persistent income-inequality that take longer to be reduced.","PeriodicalId":52490,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Economia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20190021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyses the evolution of household income inequality in Brazil from 1977 and 2013 using Brazilian National Household Survey data at aggregated and regional levels. Four income shares quantiles are analyzed: Top 1%, Top 10%, Bottom 10% and Bottom 50%. The novelty of our study is to use time series techniques to understand the phenomenon of income inequality within this period. We use Markov-Switching Regime Change Model (Hamilton (1989)) and State Space Unobservable Model (Harvey (1990)) techniques. Both strategies suggest that income concentration periods are related to low growth rates but high inflation rates as opposed to many developed countries (Piketty and Saez (2014)). Results from Markov-switching models suggest a detection of a new regime during first decade of 2000's in poorest quantiles (bottom 10% and 50%) increasing their correspondent income shares. Moreover a regime of low shares started to prevail at the same time for Top 10% whereas for those at the Top 1% had prevailed a concentrated income share regime during eighties and nineties. We argue that Brazilian macroeconomic instability helped to produce a regime of low income shares at the bottom of the distribution. Our results suggest that recent inequality reduction in the shares of top 1% quantile can be seen as a “back to normality” instead of “a new era” whereas significant changes can be seen in other quantiles. State space models results also suggests that macroeconomic of the eighties had a severe effects on Brazilian inequality whereas the dynamics of Top 1% income shares reinforce the return of 70's level considering aggregated data. Last, our estimates unveil important regional differences in many quantiles mainly on the low brackets where poorer regions seem to have persistent income-inequality that take longer to be reduced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1977 - 2013年巴西家庭收入不平等的时间序列分析
摘要本文利用巴西全国家庭调查的汇总和区域数据,分析了1977年至2013年巴西家庭收入不平等的演变。分析了四个收入份额分位数:前1%、前10%、后10%和后50%。我们研究的新颖之处在于使用时间序列技术来理解这一时期的收入不平等现象。我们使用马尔可夫切换状态变化模型(Hamilton(1989))和状态空间不可观测模型(Harvey(1990))技术。这两种策略都表明,与许多发达国家相比,收入集中期与低增长率有关,但与高通胀率有关(Piketty和Saez(2014))。马尔可夫转换模型的结果表明,在2000年代的第一个十年里,在最贫穷的分位数(最底层的10%和50%)中发现了一种新的制度,增加了他们相应的收入份额。此外,在同一时间,前10%的人开始实行低份额制度,而在80年代和90年代,前1%的人实行集中收入份额制度。我们认为,巴西宏观经济的不稳定有助于在分配的底部产生低收入份额制度。我们的研究结果表明,最近前1%分位数份额的不平等减少可以被视为“回归常态”,而不是“新时代”,而其他分位数可以看到显著变化。国家空间模型的结果还表明,80年代的宏观经济对巴西的不平等产生了严重影响,而考虑到汇总数据,前1%收入份额的动态增强了70年代水平的回报。最后,我们的估计揭示了许多分位数的重要地区差异,主要是在较低的阶层,较贫穷的地区似乎存在持续的收入不平等,需要更长的时间才能减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Economia
Revista Brasileira de Economia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Brasileira de Economia (RBE) é a mais antiga publicação de Economia do Brasil, e a segunda mais antiga da América Latina. Seus fundadores foram Arizio de Viana, o primeiro editor, e Eugênio Gudin, um dos mais influentes economistas da história brasileira. A RBE foi apresentada no seu primeiro número pelo professor Luiz Simões Lopes, em uma Introdução que poderia constar ainda hoje de qualquer número da revista.
期刊最新文献
Incentivos fiscais são efetivos na melhoria dos serviços educacionais? Cota-parte do ICMS no acesso à educação Uma nota sobre a avaliação do programa Agroamigo através de modelos Autoregressivos Vetoriais em Painel Modeling multivariate time series with copulas: Implications for pricing revenue insurance Descartando favorecimento político a beneficiários de programas habitacionais: Uma aplicação de Regressão em Descontinuidade O Impacto do comercio internacional sobre as condições de saúde: Uma abordagem estrutural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1