Displaying the Periphery: The Upper-Hungarian Museum and the Politics of Regional Museums in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy

IF 0.3 0 ART Visual Resources Pub Date : 2018-07-02 DOI:10.1080/01973762.2018.1483309
Nóra Veszprémi
{"title":"Displaying the Periphery: The Upper-Hungarian Museum and the Politics of Regional Museums in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy","authors":"Nóra Veszprémi","doi":"10.1080/01973762.2018.1483309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Upper-Hungarian Museum of Kassa/Kaschau/Košice was established in 1872 as one of the many ambitious but severely underfunded regional museums coming into being in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. This article examines how the museum negotiated the delicate balance between maintaining good relations with the capital, necessary for the sake of survival, and following its own local agenda. It discusses the history of the institution in the context of the complex political and administrative structure of Austria-Hungary, as an example of the dynamics between the Monarchy’s “centers” and “peripheries.” After 1867, Hungary’s governments took the course of centralization, curtailing the political agency of the counties, while increasingly forcing non-Hungarian speakers in multi-ethnic regions such as Upper Hungary to adopt the Hungarian language. The article examines the museum’s place in these processes, arguing that, rather than simply disseminating the narratives of the center, the museum conceptualized its own role in a more autonomous and multi-faceted way. Finally, it seeks to use the museum as an example of the “periphery” as an autonomous entity, and to question the usefulness of a simple binary of center and periphery in researching Austro-Hungarian culture.","PeriodicalId":41894,"journal":{"name":"Visual Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973762.2018.1483309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2018.1483309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Upper-Hungarian Museum of Kassa/Kaschau/Košice was established in 1872 as one of the many ambitious but severely underfunded regional museums coming into being in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. This article examines how the museum negotiated the delicate balance between maintaining good relations with the capital, necessary for the sake of survival, and following its own local agenda. It discusses the history of the institution in the context of the complex political and administrative structure of Austria-Hungary, as an example of the dynamics between the Monarchy’s “centers” and “peripheries.” After 1867, Hungary’s governments took the course of centralization, curtailing the political agency of the counties, while increasingly forcing non-Hungarian speakers in multi-ethnic regions such as Upper Hungary to adopt the Hungarian language. The article examines the museum’s place in these processes, arguing that, rather than simply disseminating the narratives of the center, the museum conceptualized its own role in a more autonomous and multi-faceted way. Finally, it seeks to use the museum as an example of the “periphery” as an autonomous entity, and to question the usefulness of a simple binary of center and periphery in researching Austro-Hungarian culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
展示外围:上匈牙利博物馆与奥匈帝国时期地区博物馆的政治
上匈牙利卡斯萨/卡斯肖/科希策博物馆成立于1872年,是奥匈帝国时期众多雄心勃勃但资金严重不足的地区博物馆之一。这篇文章探讨了博物馆如何在与首都保持良好关系(这是生存所必需的)和遵循自己的地方议程之间达成微妙的平衡。它在奥匈帝国复杂的政治和行政结构的背景下讨论了该制度的历史,作为君主政体“中心”和“外围”之间动态的一个例子。1867年后,匈牙利政府采取了中央集权的路线,削弱了各县的政治机构,同时越来越多地迫使上匈牙利等多民族地区的非匈牙利语使用者采用匈牙利语。这篇文章考察了博物馆在这些过程中的地位,认为博物馆不是简单地传播中心的叙事,而是以一种更自主和多方面的方式概念化了自己的角色。最后,它试图将博物馆作为一个自治实体的“外围”的例子,并质疑中心和外围的简单二元性在研究奥匈文化中的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
There Is a Digital Art History Creative-aesthetic product design and tools ‘Constructing a Critical Situation’: A Data-Based Approach to the Study of Cultural Periodicals and Art Criticism How Do Ecological Emotions Emerge? An Analysis of Contemporary Swiss Eco-documentaries The Emotions of the Late Anthropocene in Visual Arts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1