Opportunities for Early Cancer Detection: The Rise of ctDNA Methylation-Based Pan-Cancer Screening Technologies

IF 2.5 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Epigenomes Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.3390/epigenomes6010006
Nicolas Constantin, A. A. I. Sina, D. Korbie, M. Trau
{"title":"Opportunities for Early Cancer Detection: The Rise of ctDNA Methylation-Based Pan-Cancer Screening Technologies","authors":"Nicolas Constantin, A. A. I. Sina, D. Korbie, M. Trau","doi":"10.3390/epigenomes6010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of conventional screening programs to identify early-stage malignancies can be limited by the low number of cancers recommended for screening as well as the high cumulative false-positive rate, and associated iatrogenic burden, resulting from repeated multimodal testing. The opportunity to use minimally invasive liquid biopsy testing to screen asymptomatic individuals at-risk for multiple cancers simultaneously could benefit from the aggregated diseases prevalence and a fixed specificity. Increasing both latter parameters is paramount to mediate high positive predictive value—a useful metric to evaluate a screening test accuracy and its potential harm-benefit. Thus, the use of a single test for multi-cancer early detection (stMCED) has emerged as an appealing strategy for increasing early cancer detection rate efficiency and benefit population health. A recent flurry of these stMCED technologies have been reported for clinical potential; however, their development is facing unique challenges to effectively improve clinical cost–benefit. One promising avenue is the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for detecting DNA methylation biomarker fingerprints of malignancies—a hallmark of disease aetiology and progression holding the potential to be tissue- and cancer-type specific. Utilizing panels of epigenetic biomarkers could potentially help to detect earlier stages of malignancies as well as identify a tumour of origin from blood testing, useful information for follow-up clinical decision making and subsequent patient care improvement. Overall, this review collates the latest and most promising stMCED methodologies, summarizes their clinical performances, and discusses the specific requirements multi-cancer tests should meet to be successfully implemented into screening guidelines.","PeriodicalId":55768,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes6010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The efficiency of conventional screening programs to identify early-stage malignancies can be limited by the low number of cancers recommended for screening as well as the high cumulative false-positive rate, and associated iatrogenic burden, resulting from repeated multimodal testing. The opportunity to use minimally invasive liquid biopsy testing to screen asymptomatic individuals at-risk for multiple cancers simultaneously could benefit from the aggregated diseases prevalence and a fixed specificity. Increasing both latter parameters is paramount to mediate high positive predictive value—a useful metric to evaluate a screening test accuracy and its potential harm-benefit. Thus, the use of a single test for multi-cancer early detection (stMCED) has emerged as an appealing strategy for increasing early cancer detection rate efficiency and benefit population health. A recent flurry of these stMCED technologies have been reported for clinical potential; however, their development is facing unique challenges to effectively improve clinical cost–benefit. One promising avenue is the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for detecting DNA methylation biomarker fingerprints of malignancies—a hallmark of disease aetiology and progression holding the potential to be tissue- and cancer-type specific. Utilizing panels of epigenetic biomarkers could potentially help to detect earlier stages of malignancies as well as identify a tumour of origin from blood testing, useful information for follow-up clinical decision making and subsequent patient care improvement. Overall, this review collates the latest and most promising stMCED methodologies, summarizes their clinical performances, and discusses the specific requirements multi-cancer tests should meet to be successfully implemented into screening guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症早期检测的机遇:基于ctDNA甲基化的泛癌筛查技术的兴起
常规筛查方案识别早期恶性肿瘤的效率可能受到以下因素的限制:推荐筛查的癌症数量少,累积假阳性率高,以及重复多模式检测导致的相关医源性负担。使用微创液体活检检测同时筛查有多种癌症风险的无症状个体的机会可能受益于疾病的总体患病率和固定特异性。增加后两个参数对于调解高阳性预测值至关重要,这是评估筛选测试准确性及其潜在危害的有用指标。因此,使用单一检测方法进行多种癌症早期检测(stMCED)已成为提高早期癌症检出率、效率和造福人群健康的一种有吸引力的策略。据报道,最近一系列的stMCED技术具有临床潜力;然而,它们的发展面临着独特的挑战,难以有效地提高临床成本效益。一个有希望的途径是分析循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)来检测恶性肿瘤的DNA甲基化生物标记指纹——这是疾病病因学和进展的标志,具有组织和癌症类型特异性的潜力。利用表观遗传生物标志物可以潜在地帮助检测恶性肿瘤的早期阶段,并从血液检测中确定肿瘤的起源,为后续临床决策和随后的患者护理改善提供有用的信息。总之,本文整理了最新和最有前途的stMCED方法,总结了它们的临床表现,并讨论了多癌检测成功实施到筛查指南中应满足的具体要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenomes
Epigenomes GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Environmental Factor Index (EFI): A Novel Approach to Measure the Strength of Environmental Influence on DNA Methylation in Identical Twins. Age-Dependent DNA Methylation Variability on the X-Chromosome in Male and Female Twins. Histone Modification Pathways Suppressing Cryptic Transcription. Epigenetic Landscape of DNA Methylation in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Transcription Factors Are Involved in Wizened Bud Occurrence During the Growing Season in the Pyrus pyrifolia Cultivar 'Sucui 1'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1