A flexible vertebroplasty device used in vertebroplasty for osteoporotic thoracic compression fractures

Bolong Zheng, D. Hao, Liang Yan, Zheng-wei Xu, Xiaobin Yang, Z. Chang
{"title":"A flexible vertebroplasty device used in vertebroplasty for osteoporotic thoracic compression fractures","authors":"Bolong Zheng, D. Hao, Liang Yan, Zheng-wei Xu, Xiaobin Yang, Z. Chang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the curative effects between our self-designed flexible vertebroplasty device and the conventional straight bone cement injector in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic compression fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 140 patients with osteoporotic thoracic compression fracture who had been admitted to Department of Spine Surgery, Xi’an Honghui Hospital from June 2016 to January 2017. They were 61 males and 79 females, aged from 55 to 88 years (average, 70.3 years). Their fractured vertebrae distributed from T5 to T12. Our self-designed flexible vertebroplasty device was used in 67 of them (group A) while the conventional straight bone cement injector in the other 73 patients (group B). The 2 groups were compared in terms of operative time, amount of bone cement injected, distribution ratio of bone cement on the contralateral side, bone cement leakage, and visual analogue scale (VAS), anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebra and kyphosis cobb angle at 1 d, 1 and 2 years after operation. \n \n \nResults \nThe 2 groups were comparable due to their insignificant differences in preoperative general data (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for more than 2 years, with an average of 26.7 months. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in operation time (28.1±4.2 min versus 26.3±3.2 min) or in bone cement leakage [34.3%(23/67) versus 17.8%(13/73)] (P>0.05). However, group A was significantly higher than group B in amount of bone cement injection (5.6±1.2 mL versus 4.9±1.1 mL) and in distribution ratio of bone cement on the contralateral side (71.5%±11.3% versus 65.7%±12.9%), significantly lower than group B in VAS at 1 and 2 years after operation (2.8±0.7 and 3.0±0.9 versus 3.1±0.8 and 3.4±0.8) and in kyphosis cobb angle at 1 and 2 years after operation (25.2°±5.2° and 26.8°±5.5° versus 27.7°±4.9° and 29.1°±1.6°), and significantly higher than group B in anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebra at 1 and 2 years after operation (39.2%±8.1% and 37.1%±7.2% versus 35.4%±7.8% and 33.2%±8.4%) (all P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nCompared with the conventional straight bone cement injector, our self-designed flexible vertebroplasty device can lead to better contralateral distribution of bone cement, more effective maintenance of the height of injured vertebra, and better long-term analgesic effect in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic compression fractures. \n \n \nKey words: \nVertebroplasty; Osteoporosis; Thoracic fracture; Flexible; Kyphosis","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"21 1","pages":"881-887"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-7600.2019.10.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the curative effects between our self-designed flexible vertebroplasty device and the conventional straight bone cement injector in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic compression fractures. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 140 patients with osteoporotic thoracic compression fracture who had been admitted to Department of Spine Surgery, Xi’an Honghui Hospital from June 2016 to January 2017. They were 61 males and 79 females, aged from 55 to 88 years (average, 70.3 years). Their fractured vertebrae distributed from T5 to T12. Our self-designed flexible vertebroplasty device was used in 67 of them (group A) while the conventional straight bone cement injector in the other 73 patients (group B). The 2 groups were compared in terms of operative time, amount of bone cement injected, distribution ratio of bone cement on the contralateral side, bone cement leakage, and visual analogue scale (VAS), anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebra and kyphosis cobb angle at 1 d, 1 and 2 years after operation. Results The 2 groups were comparable due to their insignificant differences in preoperative general data (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for more than 2 years, with an average of 26.7 months. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in operation time (28.1±4.2 min versus 26.3±3.2 min) or in bone cement leakage [34.3%(23/67) versus 17.8%(13/73)] (P>0.05). However, group A was significantly higher than group B in amount of bone cement injection (5.6±1.2 mL versus 4.9±1.1 mL) and in distribution ratio of bone cement on the contralateral side (71.5%±11.3% versus 65.7%±12.9%), significantly lower than group B in VAS at 1 and 2 years after operation (2.8±0.7 and 3.0±0.9 versus 3.1±0.8 and 3.4±0.8) and in kyphosis cobb angle at 1 and 2 years after operation (25.2°±5.2° and 26.8°±5.5° versus 27.7°±4.9° and 29.1°±1.6°), and significantly higher than group B in anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebra at 1 and 2 years after operation (39.2%±8.1% and 37.1%±7.2% versus 35.4%±7.8% and 33.2%±8.4%) (all P 0.05). Conclusions Compared with the conventional straight bone cement injector, our self-designed flexible vertebroplasty device can lead to better contralateral distribution of bone cement, more effective maintenance of the height of injured vertebra, and better long-term analgesic effect in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracic compression fractures. Key words: Vertebroplasty; Osteoporosis; Thoracic fracture; Flexible; Kyphosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种用于骨质疏松性胸椎压缩性骨折椎体成形术的柔性椎体成形术装置
目的比较自行设计的柔性椎体成形术装置与常规直骨水泥注射器治疗骨质疏松性胸部压缩性骨折的疗效。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究,分析2016年6月至2017年1月西安市宏辉医院脊柱外科收治的140例骨质疏松性胸部压缩性骨折患者的临床资料。男61例,女79例,年龄55 ~ 88岁,平均70.3岁。骨折椎体分布于T5至T12。其中A组67例采用自行设计的柔性椎体成形术装置,B组73例采用常规直骨水泥注射器。比较两组术后1d、1、2年的手术时间、骨水泥注射量、对侧骨水泥分布比例、骨水泥漏出、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、骨折椎体前高度比及cobb角。结果两组术前一般资料差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),具有可比性。所有患者均随访2年以上,平均26.7个月。两组手术时间(28.1±4.2 min vs 26.3±3.2 min)和骨水泥渗漏(34.3%(23/67)vs 17.8%(13/73))差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。但A组骨水泥注射量(5.6±1.2 mL)和对侧骨水泥分布比(71.5%±11.3%)显著高于B组(4.9±1.1 mL),术后1年和2年VAS评分(2.8±0.7和3.0±0.9比3.1±0.8和3.4±0.8)和术后1年和2年cobb角评分(25.2°±5.2°和26.8°±5.5°比27.7°±4.9°和29.1°±1.6°)显著低于B组。术后1年和2年骨折椎体前高度比(39.2%±8.1%和37.1%±7.2%)显著高于B组(35.4%±7.8%和33.2%±8.4%),差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论与传统的直骨水泥注射器相比,我们自行设计的柔性椎体成形术装置对侧骨水泥分布更好,损伤椎体高度维持更有效,治疗骨质疏松性胸部压缩性骨折的远期镇痛效果更好。关键词:椎体成形术;骨质疏松症;胸椎骨折;灵活的;驼背
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Emergent foot and ankle surgery in the epidemic of COVID-19 Procedures and strategies for sterilization and management of surgical instruments for patients with orthopaedic trauma during COVID-19 epidemic Bone cement-enhanced proximal femoral nail antirotation for treatment of severe osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture Current and future management of hip fracture in the elderly Intercondylar ridge fracture: broad and narrow definitions and their clinical significance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1