The reflective fostering programme: evaluating the intervention co-delivered by social work professionals and foster carers

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Childrens Services Pub Date : 2021-05-14 DOI:10.1108/JCS-11-2020-0074
N. Midgley, Eva A. Sprecher, Antonella Cirasola, S. Redfern, Benita Pursch, Caroline Smith, Sue Douglas, Peter Martin
{"title":"The reflective fostering programme: evaluating the intervention co-delivered by social work professionals and foster carers","authors":"N. Midgley, Eva A. Sprecher, Antonella Cirasola, S. Redfern, Benita Pursch, Caroline Smith, Sue Douglas, Peter Martin","doi":"10.1108/JCS-11-2020-0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose There is little evidence regarding how to best support the emotional wellbeing of children in foster care. This research paper presents the evaluation of an adaptation of the Reflective Fostering Programme, a group-based program to support foster carers. This study aimed to explore whether a version of the Programme, co-delivered by a social work professional and an experienced foster carer, was acceptable and relevant to foster carers and to gather data on programme effectiveness. Design 38 foster carers attended the Programme and took part in this study. Data was collected regarding carerand child-focused outcomes at pre-intervention, post-intervention and 4month follow-up. Focus interviews were also conducted to further assess acceptability and relevance for foster carers. Findings Analysis of quantitative outcome showed statistically significant improvements in all outcomes considered including foster carers stress and carer-defined problems, as well as carer-reported measures of child difficulties. Focus group interviews with foster carers suggested that the Programme as co-delivered by a foster carer and a social worker was felt to be relevant and helpful to foster carers. Originality","PeriodicalId":45244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-11-2020-0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose There is little evidence regarding how to best support the emotional wellbeing of children in foster care. This research paper presents the evaluation of an adaptation of the Reflective Fostering Programme, a group-based program to support foster carers. This study aimed to explore whether a version of the Programme, co-delivered by a social work professional and an experienced foster carer, was acceptable and relevant to foster carers and to gather data on programme effectiveness. Design 38 foster carers attended the Programme and took part in this study. Data was collected regarding carerand child-focused outcomes at pre-intervention, post-intervention and 4month follow-up. Focus interviews were also conducted to further assess acceptability and relevance for foster carers. Findings Analysis of quantitative outcome showed statistically significant improvements in all outcomes considered including foster carers stress and carer-defined problems, as well as carer-reported measures of child difficulties. Focus group interviews with foster carers suggested that the Programme as co-delivered by a foster carer and a social worker was felt to be relevant and helpful to foster carers. Originality
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思寄养计划:评估由社会工作专业人员和寄养照顾者共同提供的干预措施
目的关于如何最好地支持寄养儿童的情感健康,几乎没有证据。这篇研究论文对反思性寄养计划的适应性进行了评估,这是一个以团体为基础的支持寄养照顾者的计划。这项研究的目的是探讨由一名社会工作专业人员和一名经验丰富的寄养照顾者共同提供的方案版本是否可以接受,是否与寄养照顾者相关,并收集有关方案有效性的数据。设计38名寄养照顾者参加了该计划并参与了这项研究。在干预前、干预后和4个月的随访中,收集了有关照顾者和以儿童为中心的结果的数据。还进行了焦点访谈,以进一步评估寄养照顾者的可接受性和相关性。结果定量结果分析显示,所有考虑的结果都有统计学上的显著改善,包括寄养照顾者的压力和照顾者定义的问题,以及照顾者报告的儿童困难测量。焦点小组对寄养照顾者的访谈表明,由寄养照顾者和社会工作者共同实施的该方案被认为与寄养照顾者相关并有帮助。独创性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
“Friendly, local and welcoming” – evaluation of a community mental health early intervention service From “intimate-insider” to “relative-outsider”: an autoethnographic account of undertaking social work research in one’s own “backyard” Effective child well-being practices, barriers and priority actions: survey findings from service providers and policymakers in 22 countries during COVID-19 Child First and the end of ‘bifurcation’ in youth justice? Why are there higher rates of children looked after in Wales?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1