Intratumoral Therapy II: In Vitro and In Vivo Immunologic Testing and Therapy Options

Max H. Cohen, A. Ketcham, R. Herberman
{"title":"Intratumoral Therapy II: In Vitro and In Vivo Immunologic Testing and Therapy Options","authors":"Max H. Cohen, A. Ketcham, R. Herberman","doi":"10.4172/2324-9110.1000222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a prospective randomized trial in patients with metastatic melanoma we compared two agents that had been used for metastatic melanoma intratumoral injections. Each patient had progressive metastatic disease no longer surgically controllable. Multiple metastases included satellitosis in the form of progressive nodules around the previously excised original melanoma site, and/or in-transit metastases in the form of observable tumor nodules progressing in a linear fashion toward a lymph node bearing area. As patients were receiving intratumoral injections, serially collected blood samples were tested for general immunologic reactivity and anti-melanoma reactivity. Specificity controls included breast cancer and lung cancer extracts. \nAdditionally, as a measure of cell-mediated immunity, the patients were serially skin tested against antigens to measure general and melanoma-specific immunity. Depending on the patients’ clinical courses, we have divided the patients retrospectively into groups whose clinical courses were either better or worse than their cohorts, and determined the relationship between the immune testing and the clinical courses that the patients were experiencing as the serial testing was being conducted. Additionally, in a group of similar patients that were ‘cured for life’, we analyze their treatment in light of therapeutic attempts made by others to similarly haptenize melanoma antigens. We describe potential synergies between newly discovered melanoma therapies and intratumoral injection treatments and point out potential combination therapies that may offer the potential for enhancement of antitumor effects without increased systemic toxicity, a desirable goal now that combinations of recently acceptable immunotherapies have been associated with severe potential toxicities including death.","PeriodicalId":73658,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9110.1000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial in patients with metastatic melanoma we compared two agents that had been used for metastatic melanoma intratumoral injections. Each patient had progressive metastatic disease no longer surgically controllable. Multiple metastases included satellitosis in the form of progressive nodules around the previously excised original melanoma site, and/or in-transit metastases in the form of observable tumor nodules progressing in a linear fashion toward a lymph node bearing area. As patients were receiving intratumoral injections, serially collected blood samples were tested for general immunologic reactivity and anti-melanoma reactivity. Specificity controls included breast cancer and lung cancer extracts. Additionally, as a measure of cell-mediated immunity, the patients were serially skin tested against antigens to measure general and melanoma-specific immunity. Depending on the patients’ clinical courses, we have divided the patients retrospectively into groups whose clinical courses were either better or worse than their cohorts, and determined the relationship between the immune testing and the clinical courses that the patients were experiencing as the serial testing was being conducted. Additionally, in a group of similar patients that were ‘cured for life’, we analyze their treatment in light of therapeutic attempts made by others to similarly haptenize melanoma antigens. We describe potential synergies between newly discovered melanoma therapies and intratumoral injection treatments and point out potential combination therapies that may offer the potential for enhancement of antitumor effects without increased systemic toxicity, a desirable goal now that combinations of recently acceptable immunotherapies have been associated with severe potential toxicities including death.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤内治疗II:体外和体内免疫测试和治疗选择
在一项针对转移性黑色素瘤患者的前瞻性随机试验中,我们比较了两种用于转移性黑色素瘤瘤内注射的药物。每个患者都有进展性转移性疾病,不再通过手术控制。多发性转移包括在先前切除的原始黑色素瘤部位周围形成渐进性结节的卫星状转移,和/或以可观察到的肿瘤结节以线性方式向淋巴结转移为形式的转移。当患者接受肿瘤内注射时,连续采集血液样本进行一般免疫反应性和抗黑色素瘤反应性检测。特异性对照包括乳腺癌和肺癌提取物。此外,作为细胞介导免疫的一项措施,患者对抗原进行了连续的皮肤测试,以测量一般和黑色素瘤特异性免疫。根据患者的临床病程,我们回顾性地将患者分为临床病程优于或差于其队列的组,并确定免疫测试与患者在进行系列测试时所经历的临床病程之间的关系。此外,在一组“终身治愈”的类似患者中,我们根据其他人对黑色素瘤抗原进行类似半抗原化的治疗尝试来分析他们的治疗方法。我们描述了新发现的黑色素瘤治疗和瘤内注射治疗之间的潜在协同作用,并指出潜在的联合治疗可能在不增加全身毒性的情况下提供增强抗肿瘤作用的潜力,这是一个理想的目标,因为最近可接受的免疫治疗组合已经与包括死亡在内的严重潜在毒性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Long-term Abemaciclib, A New CDK 4/6 Inhibitor: Decrease in Liver Metastasis in a Patient Suffering from Metastatic Breast Cancer Monoclonal Antibodies Treatment Safe Combination of Cisplatinand Metformin Reverts theMalignant Ascites in a MouseModel to a Solid Tumor byDownregulation of ÎNp63 andInduces Tumor Dormancy via mTOR/ p21 Mechanism Hepatocellular CarcinomaPost Viral Hepatitis B and C:Application of the PrognosticScore of Singapore Iron Overload in the Setting of H63D Gene Mutation and Inrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1