Can artificial intelligence beat the stock market?

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Studies in Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1108/sef-03-2022-0133
Garrison Hongyu Song, Ajeet K. Jain
{"title":"Can artificial intelligence beat the stock market?","authors":"Garrison Hongyu Song, Ajeet K. Jain","doi":"10.1108/sef-03-2022-0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAcademia and financial practitioners have mixed opinions about whether artificial intelligence (AI) can beat the stock market. The purpose of this paper is to investigate theoretically what would happen if AI has further evolved into a superior ability to predict the future more accurately than average investors.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA theoretical model in an endowment economy with two types of representative investors (traditional investors and AI investors) is proposed, and based on the model, a long-run survival analysis for both types of investors is implemented.\n\n\nFindings\nThe model presented in this paper indicates that being equipped with a superior ability to predict the future more accurately than traditional investors cannot guarantee AI investors to always beat the stock market in the long run. Those investors may be extinct, all depending on the structure/parameters of the stock market.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, they are the first to set up a representative agent equilibrium model to explore the above question seriously.\n","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-03-2022-0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Academia and financial practitioners have mixed opinions about whether artificial intelligence (AI) can beat the stock market. The purpose of this paper is to investigate theoretically what would happen if AI has further evolved into a superior ability to predict the future more accurately than average investors. Design/methodology/approach A theoretical model in an endowment economy with two types of representative investors (traditional investors and AI investors) is proposed, and based on the model, a long-run survival analysis for both types of investors is implemented. Findings The model presented in this paper indicates that being equipped with a superior ability to predict the future more accurately than traditional investors cannot guarantee AI investors to always beat the stock market in the long run. Those investors may be extinct, all depending on the structure/parameters of the stock market. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, they are the first to set up a representative agent equilibrium model to explore the above question seriously.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能能打败股市吗?
对于人工智能(AI)能否打败股市,学术界和金融从业者意见不一。本文的目的是从理论上研究,如果人工智能进一步发展成为一种比普通投资者更准确地预测未来的卓越能力,会发生什么。设计/方法/方法提出了具有两种代表性投资者(传统投资者和人工智能投资者)的禀赋经济理论模型,并基于该模型对两种投资者进行了长期生存分析。本文提出的模型表明,人工智能投资者拥有比传统投资者更准确地预测未来的优越能力,但并不能保证他们在长期内总是跑赢股市。这些投资者可能已经灭绝了,这一切都取决于股票市场的结构/参数。原创性/价值据笔者所知,他们是第一个建立有代表性的主体均衡模型来认真探讨上述问题的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling exogenous shocks, financial stress and US economic performance Influence of Ukrainian refugees on the exchange rate and stock market in neighboring countries Impact of the Russia–Ukraine War: evidence from G20 countries Directional connectedness between the electricity prices and natural gas prices: evidence from Alberta’s electricity market How do ESG challenges affect default risk? An empirical analysis from the global banking sector perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1