Measuring innovative literacy: conceptualization, scale development and validation

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Intellectual Capital Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1108/jic-09-2022-0182
Asiye Yüksel, M. Gök, Ayşe Günsel
{"title":"Measuring innovative literacy: conceptualization, scale development and validation","authors":"Asiye Yüksel, M. Gök, Ayşe Günsel","doi":"10.1108/jic-09-2022-0182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThere is a need to understand the role of innovative literacy in intellectual capital literature. This study aims to develop the innovative literacy scale, starting from the framework of innovative literacy, which is not prominent in the literature. Accordingly, this study develops and validates an innovative literacy scale.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative research methodology was used for this study, whereby a unipolar 5-point Likert scale self-report questionnaire was designed. Scale development analyses were performed in three steps: (1) The first item pool was created by literature review; (2) preliminary quantitative testing of the reliability and validity of the items, including confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), was performed; and (3) final scale validation through a discriminant and validity test was done using descriptive factor analyses (DFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM).FindingsFor the developed scale, the sample size was 220 in the first stage, 440 in the second stage, and 457 in the third stage. The validity and reliability analyses of the results were completed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) programs. After the preliminary stages, the validity and reliability tests of the scale were carried out, and 17 items (in 4 dimensions) of the innovative literacy scale were finally developed.Research limitations/implicationsThis research fills a conceptual gap in the literature. However, since this concept is evaluated using the human, customer and structural components of intellectual capital, future researchers may examine this concept together with other features of intellectual capital and with larger samples.Originality/valueThe article contributes to understanding innovation by developing a scale to evaluate InnoLiteracy, which may be an essential factor influencing innovative literate behaviours. The perceived multi-dimensional scale of InnoLiteracy will be beneficial for academicians and human resources professionals. Although there are studies in the related literature on the importance of the concept of innovative literacy, a scale from the perspectives of intellectual capital and sustainable innovation will be unique since there is no tool for its measurement yet. The findings of the InnoLiteracy research are meaningful, and the scale has the potential to meet the needs of researchers, schools, government agencies and businesses.","PeriodicalId":48191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-09-2022-0182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThere is a need to understand the role of innovative literacy in intellectual capital literature. This study aims to develop the innovative literacy scale, starting from the framework of innovative literacy, which is not prominent in the literature. Accordingly, this study develops and validates an innovative literacy scale.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative research methodology was used for this study, whereby a unipolar 5-point Likert scale self-report questionnaire was designed. Scale development analyses were performed in three steps: (1) The first item pool was created by literature review; (2) preliminary quantitative testing of the reliability and validity of the items, including confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), was performed; and (3) final scale validation through a discriminant and validity test was done using descriptive factor analyses (DFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM).FindingsFor the developed scale, the sample size was 220 in the first stage, 440 in the second stage, and 457 in the third stage. The validity and reliability analyses of the results were completed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) programs. After the preliminary stages, the validity and reliability tests of the scale were carried out, and 17 items (in 4 dimensions) of the innovative literacy scale were finally developed.Research limitations/implicationsThis research fills a conceptual gap in the literature. However, since this concept is evaluated using the human, customer and structural components of intellectual capital, future researchers may examine this concept together with other features of intellectual capital and with larger samples.Originality/valueThe article contributes to understanding innovation by developing a scale to evaluate InnoLiteracy, which may be an essential factor influencing innovative literate behaviours. The perceived multi-dimensional scale of InnoLiteracy will be beneficial for academicians and human resources professionals. Although there are studies in the related literature on the importance of the concept of innovative literacy, a scale from the perspectives of intellectual capital and sustainable innovation will be unique since there is no tool for its measurement yet. The findings of the InnoLiteracy research are meaningful, and the scale has the potential to meet the needs of researchers, schools, government agencies and businesses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量创新素养:概念化、规模发展和验证
有必要了解创新素养在智力资本文学中的作用。本研究旨在从文献中并不突出的创新素养框架出发,开发创新素养量表。因此,本研究开发并验证了一个创新的识字量表。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定量研究方法,设计单极5分李克特自我报告问卷。量表开发分析分三步进行:(1)通过文献综述建立第一个题库;(2)对项目的信度和效度进行初步定量检验,包括验证性因子分析(CFA);(3)使用描述性因子分析(DFA)和结构方程模型(SEM)通过判别和效度检验进行最终量表验证。开发的量表样本量第一阶段为220人,第二阶段为440人,第三阶段为457人。采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)和力矩结构分析(AMOS)程序完成结果的效度和信度分析。经过初步阶段,对量表进行效度和信度检验,最终编制出创新素养量表的17个条目(4个维度)。研究局限/意义本研究填补了文献中概念上的空白。然而,由于这一概念是使用智力资本的人力、客户和结构成分来评估的,未来的研究人员可能会将这一概念与智力资本的其他特征和更大的样本一起研究。独创性/价值本文通过开发一个评估创新素养的量表来帮助理解创新,创新素养可能是影响创新读写行为的重要因素。对学者和人力资源专业人士而言,“创新素养”的多维尺度将是有益的。虽然相关文献对创新素养概念的重要性进行了研究,但由于目前还没有测量工具,因此从智力资本和可持续创新的角度来衡量创新素养的量表将是独一无二的。InnoLiteracy研究的结果是有意义的,其规模有可能满足研究人员、学校、政府机构和企业的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Capital is a peer-reviewed international publication dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and best practice information on all aspects of creating, identifying, managing and measuring intellectual capital in organisations. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and public sector contributors on intellectual capital strategies, approaches, frameworks, tools, techniques and technologies in order to increase the understanding of intellectual capital within the context of the modern knowledge economy. The focus of this journal is on the identification of innovative intellectual capital strategies and the application of theoretical concepts to real-world situations.
期刊最新文献
Do employees with high human capital hide knowledge? Exploring mediation and moderation mechanisms Human–artificial intellectual capital…beyond a fragmented perspective The role of intellectual capital on zakat performance: insight from Indonesia How entrepreneurs engage with feedback during value creation – a taxonomy Using firm-level intellectual capital to achieve strategic sustainability: examination of phenomenon of business failure in terms of the critical events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1