Tracing the Innovation – Decision Process for Adopting Microchip Implants: Reflections and Experiences of Estonian Employees

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Somatechnics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.3366/soma.2022.0388
A. Siibak, Marleen Otsus
{"title":"Tracing the Innovation – Decision Process for Adopting Microchip Implants: Reflections and Experiences of Estonian Employees","authors":"A. Siibak, Marleen Otsus","doi":"10.3366/soma.2022.0388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relying on the diffusion of innovations theory by Everett Rogers (1962 [2003]), the current paper traces the five steps of the innovation-decision process for adopting microchip implants in a workplace. Semi-structured individual interviews with microchipped employees (n=14) from six different organisations in Estonia were carried out to explore their opinions and experiences with adopting the use of microchip implants in their workplaces. Our analysis indicates that social reinforcement from their colleagues played an important role in the formation of the attitudes and beliefs of our interviewees about microchip implants. In fact, a strong element of homophily existed within the social system both on the organisational and interpersonal levels. Our findings suggest that the employees who decided to get microchip implants were considered to be more loyal and dedicated, as well as more in sync with the overall goals and values of the organisation; the employees who rejected the innovation were viewed as less motivated and not as invested in their organisations. All our interviewees stressed that they were voluntary adopters of the innovation and wholeheartedly believed in the value of trade-offs between convenience and privacy.","PeriodicalId":43420,"journal":{"name":"Somatechnics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2022.0388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relying on the diffusion of innovations theory by Everett Rogers (1962 [2003]), the current paper traces the five steps of the innovation-decision process for adopting microchip implants in a workplace. Semi-structured individual interviews with microchipped employees (n=14) from six different organisations in Estonia were carried out to explore their opinions and experiences with adopting the use of microchip implants in their workplaces. Our analysis indicates that social reinforcement from their colleagues played an important role in the formation of the attitudes and beliefs of our interviewees about microchip implants. In fact, a strong element of homophily existed within the social system both on the organisational and interpersonal levels. Our findings suggest that the employees who decided to get microchip implants were considered to be more loyal and dedicated, as well as more in sync with the overall goals and values of the organisation; the employees who rejected the innovation were viewed as less motivated and not as invested in their organisations. All our interviewees stressed that they were voluntary adopters of the innovation and wholeheartedly believed in the value of trade-offs between convenience and privacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追踪创新 – 采用微芯片植入物的决策过程:爱沙尼亚员工的思考和经验
依托Everett Rogers(1962[2003])的创新扩散理论,本文追溯了在工作场所采用微芯片植入物的创新决策过程的五个步骤。对爱沙尼亚六个不同组织的微芯片员工(n=14)进行了半结构化的个人访谈,以探讨他们在工作场所采用微芯片植入物的意见和经验。我们的分析表明,来自他们同事的社会强化在我们的受访者对微芯片植入的态度和信念的形成中发挥了重要作用。事实上,在组织和人际层面上,社会系统中都存在着强烈的同质性因素。我们的研究结果表明,决定植入微芯片的员工被认为更忠诚、更敬业,也更符合组织的总体目标和价值观;拒绝创新的员工被认为积极性较低,对组织投入不足。我们所有的受访者都强调,他们是自愿采用这项创新的,并且全心全意地相信在方便和隐私之间进行权衡的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Somatechnics
Somatechnics SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Joshua St. Pierre, Cheap Talk: Disability and the Politics of Communication Critical Disability Studies, Corporeality and Child Maltreatment: Theorising the Somatechnics of Self and Other The Many Names and Shapes of Water: Emergent Narratives on a Non-existing Water Body in Latin America The Somatechnics of Water: Part 2 Permeable Housing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1