Content-Based Recommender Systems Taxonomy

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/fcds-2023-0009
H. Papadakis, A. Papagrigoriou, Eleftherios Kosmas, C. Panagiotakis, Smaragda Markaki, P. Fragopoulou
{"title":"Content-Based Recommender Systems Taxonomy","authors":"H. Papadakis, A. Papagrigoriou, Eleftherios Kosmas, C. Panagiotakis, Smaragda Markaki, P. Fragopoulou","doi":"10.2478/fcds-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the era of internet access, recommender systems try to alleviate the difficulty consumers face while trying to find items (e.g. services, products, or information) that better match their needs. To do so, a recommender system selects and proposes (possibly unknown) items that may be of interest to some candidate consumer, by predicting her/his preference for this item. Given the diversity of needs between consumers and the enormous variety of items to be recommended, a large set of approaches have been proposed by the research community. This paper provides a review of the approaches proposed in the entire research area of content-based recommender systems, and not only in one part of it. To facilitate understanding, we provide a categorization of each approach based on the tools and techniques employed, which results to the main contribution of this paper, a content-based recommender systems taxonomy. This way, the reader acquires a quick and complete understanding of this research area. Finally, we provide a comparison of content-based recommender systems according to their ability to efficiently handle well-known drawbacks.","PeriodicalId":42909,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"211 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the era of internet access, recommender systems try to alleviate the difficulty consumers face while trying to find items (e.g. services, products, or information) that better match their needs. To do so, a recommender system selects and proposes (possibly unknown) items that may be of interest to some candidate consumer, by predicting her/his preference for this item. Given the diversity of needs between consumers and the enormous variety of items to be recommended, a large set of approaches have been proposed by the research community. This paper provides a review of the approaches proposed in the entire research area of content-based recommender systems, and not only in one part of it. To facilitate understanding, we provide a categorization of each approach based on the tools and techniques employed, which results to the main contribution of this paper, a content-based recommender systems taxonomy. This way, the reader acquires a quick and complete understanding of this research area. Finally, we provide a comparison of content-based recommender systems according to their ability to efficiently handle well-known drawbacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于内容的推荐系统分类
在互联网接入时代,推荐系统试图减轻消费者在寻找更符合其需求的项目(如服务、产品或信息)时面临的困难。为了做到这一点,推荐系统通过预测某个候选消费者对该商品的偏好,选择并提出(可能是未知的)可能感兴趣的商品。考虑到消费者之间需求的多样性以及需要推荐的产品种类繁多,研究界已经提出了大量的方法。本文对基于内容的推荐系统的整个研究领域提出的方法进行了综述,而不仅仅是其中的一部分。为了便于理解,我们根据所使用的工具和技术对每种方法进行了分类,这是本文的主要贡献,即基于内容的推荐系统分类法。这样,读者就能对这个研究领域有一个快速而全面的了解。最后,我们根据基于内容的推荐系统有效处理众所周知的缺陷的能力对它们进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
A DNA Algorithm for Calculating the Maximum Flow of a Network Traceability of Architectural Design Decisions and Software Artifacts: A Systematic Mapping Study Traveling salesman problem parallelization by solving clustered subproblems Towards automated recommendations for drunk driving penalties in Poland - a case study analysis in selected court Designing a Tri-Objective, Sustainable, Closed-Loop, and Multi-Echelon Supply Chain During the COVID-19 and Lockdowns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1