The German Beast Unleashed: Kleist’s Hermannsschlacht and the Suspension of 'Human Rights' in the Era of Nationalism

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09593683.2018.1433479
C. Nitschke
{"title":"The German Beast Unleashed: Kleist’s Hermannsschlacht and the Suspension of 'Human Rights' in the Era of Nationalism","authors":"C. Nitschke","doi":"10.1080/09593683.2018.1433479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article scrutinises the aporetic confrontation of different ultimate values in Kleist’s infamous Die Hermannsschlacht, namely nationalism and a basic notion of ‘human rights’. Kleist’s play does not settle for one of these priorities, but conceptualizes the nation as a facilitator, promulgator, and protector of rights and — at the very same time — as an inexorable principle of selection which ties the notions of exclusion and elimination closely to those of inclusion and participation. In this respect, Die Hermannsschlacht not only prepares and anticipates elements of Carl Schmitt’s political theory, but also comes very close to Giorgio Agamben’s analysis of sovereignty and the production of politically qualified life in his Homo Sacer series. However, it does so without completely abandoning the universal ideas of human rights.","PeriodicalId":40789,"journal":{"name":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09593683.2018.1433479","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2018.1433479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article scrutinises the aporetic confrontation of different ultimate values in Kleist’s infamous Die Hermannsschlacht, namely nationalism and a basic notion of ‘human rights’. Kleist’s play does not settle for one of these priorities, but conceptualizes the nation as a facilitator, promulgator, and protector of rights and — at the very same time — as an inexorable principle of selection which ties the notions of exclusion and elimination closely to those of inclusion and participation. In this respect, Die Hermannsschlacht not only prepares and anticipates elements of Carl Schmitt’s political theory, but also comes very close to Giorgio Agamben’s analysis of sovereignty and the production of politically qualified life in his Homo Sacer series. However, it does so without completely abandoning the universal ideas of human rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国野兽的释放:克莱斯特的赫尔曼斯施拉赫特与民族主义时代“人权”的中止
摘要本文考察了克莱斯特臭名昭著的《Hermannsschlacht》中不同终极价值,即民族主义与“人权”基本概念的辩证对立。克莱斯特的戏剧并没有满足于这些优先事项之一,而是将国家概念化为权利的促进者、传播者和保护者,同时,作为一种无情的选择原则,将排斥和消除的概念与包容和参与的概念紧密联系在一起。在这方面,《Hermannsschlacht》不仅准备和预测了卡尔·施密特(Carl Schmitt)政治理论的要素,而且非常接近乔治·阿甘本(Giorgio Agamben)在他的Homo Sacer系列中对主权和政治上合格的生活的生产的分析。然而,它这样做并没有完全放弃人权的普遍观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Publications of the English Goethe Society
Publications of the English Goethe Society LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The Battle of the Statues in Berlin, 1859–71: Reflections on the Public Image and Standing of the German Classical Authors The Whirlwind of the Biosphere: On Vernadsky’s Goethean Cosmos – An Introduction to Vernadsky’s Goethe Essay Vladimir Vernadsky’s ‘Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist’: Its Prehistory and Reception Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist* ‘Gestaltenlehre ist Verwandlungslehre’: Zur ‘genetischen Methode’ als einem interdisziplinären Schlüsselkonzept Goethes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1