A Government of Creditors: Machiavelli on Genoa, the Bank of San Giorgio, and the Financial Oligarchy

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1086/721231
Y. Winter
{"title":"A Government of Creditors: Machiavelli on Genoa, the Bank of San Giorgio, and the Financial Oligarchy","authors":"Y. Winter","doi":"10.1086/721231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If Machiavelli was a committed republican, as the dominant interpretations suggest, then why did he heap praise on an oligarchic creditor government that ran the city of Genoa in the fifteenth century? In the Florentine Histories, Machiavelli offers a curious encomium to a remarkable oligarchic institution in Genoa: the Bank of Saint George (Casa di San Giorgio). A creditor association and oldest chartered bank in the world, San Giorgio owned Genoa’s public debt. In return for the credit it extended to the commune, the Casa exercised a striking degree of fiscal, judicial, political, and even military power. This politically unaccountable creditor government with its discretionary powers would seem to violate Machiavelli’s commitments to institutionalized forms of sharing power. This article offers a sustained analysis and historical contextualization of Machiavelli’s remarks about San Giorgio. Drawing on historical research on public debt in Renaissance Italy, I put forward a new hypothesis to explain Machiavelli’s praise for the institution.","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":"54 1","pages":"658 - 683"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

If Machiavelli was a committed republican, as the dominant interpretations suggest, then why did he heap praise on an oligarchic creditor government that ran the city of Genoa in the fifteenth century? In the Florentine Histories, Machiavelli offers a curious encomium to a remarkable oligarchic institution in Genoa: the Bank of Saint George (Casa di San Giorgio). A creditor association and oldest chartered bank in the world, San Giorgio owned Genoa’s public debt. In return for the credit it extended to the commune, the Casa exercised a striking degree of fiscal, judicial, political, and even military power. This politically unaccountable creditor government with its discretionary powers would seem to violate Machiavelli’s commitments to institutionalized forms of sharing power. This article offers a sustained analysis and historical contextualization of Machiavelli’s remarks about San Giorgio. Drawing on historical research on public debt in Renaissance Italy, I put forward a new hypothesis to explain Machiavelli’s praise for the institution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
债权人政府:马基雅维利论热那亚、圣乔治银行和金融寡头
如果马基雅维利是一个忠诚的共和主义者,正如主流的解释所暗示的那样,那么他为什么要对15世纪统治热那亚市的寡头债权人政府大加赞扬呢?在《佛罗伦萨历史》一书中,马基雅维利对热那亚一个引人注目的寡头机构——圣乔治银行(Casa di San Giorgio)——进行了奇怪的颂扬。作为债权人协会和世界上最古老的特许银行,圣乔治银行拥有热那亚的公共债务。作为给予公社信用的回报,Casa行使了惊人程度的财政、司法、政治甚至军事权力。这种政治上不负责任的债权人政府拥有自由裁量权,似乎违反了马基雅维利对制度化的权力分享形式的承诺。本文对马基雅维利关于圣乔治的评论进行了持续的分析和历史语境化。根据对意大利文艺复兴时期公共债务的历史研究,我提出了一个新的假设来解释马基雅维利对这一制度的赞扬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Ask a Political Scientist: A Conversation with Nicholas Xenos about Critical Theory, Democratic Politics, and the Problems with Patriotism Conceptual Contestation: An Empirical Approach Trajectories Vegans and “Green-Collared Criminals”: the Depoliticization of Animal Advocacy in Public Discourse Democracy and the Unconscious
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1