Leandro O. Vieira-Filho, Maria L. Silveira, Marta M. Kohmann, Caetano A. R. Sales, Lynn E. Sollenberger, Jehangir H. Bhadha, Sarah L. Strauss, Philipe Moriel
{"title":"Water table effect on phosphorus solubility in biosolids-amended soils","authors":"Leandro O. Vieira-Filho, Maria L. Silveira, Marta M. Kohmann, Caetano A. R. Sales, Lynn E. Sollenberger, Jehangir H. Bhadha, Sarah L. Strauss, Philipe Moriel","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The predominantly coarse texture of Florida Spodosols, limited P-holding capacity, and fluctuating water table present major challenges for management of P, particularly in agricultural areas receiving biosolids. This study evaluated the impacts of water table level on P fate in Spodosols with contrasting P-management histories. Treatments were a combination of soils with different biosolids histories (control [no biosolids], intermediate and high [biosolids-P loads of 567 and 706 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively]) and two moisture regimens (drained and flooded [water table at the depth of spodic horizon or 2 cm above soil surface, respectively]). Soil samples (A, E, and B horizons) were packed into PVC columns (96 cm tall, 11 cm in diameter), mimicking the soil profile. Leachate and pore water samples were collected at 2-week intervals for 20 weeks. Regardless of treatment, proportion of P leached was low (∼0.2% total P mass). This was due to the significant P storage provided by the spodic horizon. Despite elevated soil P levels, Al and Fe added with biosolids reduced P solubility by as much as 55% compared with the control. Although flooding increased P leaching due to the reductive dissolution and hydrolysis of Al-P and Fe-P compounds, moisture regimen effects were generally negligible and inconsistent. Soil P storage capacity has been used as a risk assessment tool to determine biosolids-P applications; however, our data demonstrated that additional field studies are needed to validate this concept, particularly its applicability and interpretation in biosolids-amended soils that contain appreciable amounts of Fe- and Al-organic complexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 5","pages":"1191-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The predominantly coarse texture of Florida Spodosols, limited P-holding capacity, and fluctuating water table present major challenges for management of P, particularly in agricultural areas receiving biosolids. This study evaluated the impacts of water table level on P fate in Spodosols with contrasting P-management histories. Treatments were a combination of soils with different biosolids histories (control [no biosolids], intermediate and high [biosolids-P loads of 567 and 706 kg P ha−1, respectively]) and two moisture regimens (drained and flooded [water table at the depth of spodic horizon or 2 cm above soil surface, respectively]). Soil samples (A, E, and B horizons) were packed into PVC columns (96 cm tall, 11 cm in diameter), mimicking the soil profile. Leachate and pore water samples were collected at 2-week intervals for 20 weeks. Regardless of treatment, proportion of P leached was low (∼0.2% total P mass). This was due to the significant P storage provided by the spodic horizon. Despite elevated soil P levels, Al and Fe added with biosolids reduced P solubility by as much as 55% compared with the control. Although flooding increased P leaching due to the reductive dissolution and hydrolysis of Al-P and Fe-P compounds, moisture regimen effects were generally negligible and inconsistent. Soil P storage capacity has been used as a risk assessment tool to determine biosolids-P applications; however, our data demonstrated that additional field studies are needed to validate this concept, particularly its applicability and interpretation in biosolids-amended soils that contain appreciable amounts of Fe- and Al-organic complexes.
佛罗里达Spodosols的主要粗糙结构,有限的P保持能力和波动的地下水位是P管理的主要挑战,特别是在接收生物固体的农业地区。本研究通过对土壤磷管理历史的对比,评估了地下水位对土壤中磷命运的影响。处理组合采用不同生物固体历史的土壤(对照[无生物固体]、中等和高[生物固体-磷负荷分别为567和706 kg P / h - 1])和两种水分方案(排干和淹水[地表以下水位分别为2 cm)。土壤样品(A, E和B层)被装入PVC柱(96厘米高,直径11厘米),模拟土壤剖面。每隔2周采集渗滤液和孔隙水样品,共20周。无论采用何种处理,磷的浸出比例都很低(约0.2%的总磷质量)。这是由于视界提供了显著的磷储存。尽管土壤磷含量升高,但与对照相比,添加生物固体的Al和Fe使磷的溶解度降低了55%。虽然由于Al-P和Fe-P化合物的还原性溶解和水解,淹水增加了P的淋溶,但水分方案的影响通常可以忽略不计,而且不一致。土壤磷储量已被用作确定生物固体磷施用的风险评估工具;然而,我们的数据表明,需要更多的实地研究来验证这一概念,特别是其在含有大量铁和铝有机复合物的生物固体修正土壤中的适用性和解释。