Outcomes of Intranasal Corticosteroid Treatment and Associated Factors in Children With Clinically Diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Q4 Medicine Sleep Medicine Research Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.17241/smr.2022.01270
Trakarnta Iadprapal, W. Anuntaseree, N. Pruphetkaew, K. Ruangnapa, Kantara Saelim, Pharsai Prasertsan
{"title":"Outcomes of Intranasal Corticosteroid Treatment and Associated Factors in Children With Clinically Diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnea","authors":"Trakarnta Iadprapal, W. Anuntaseree, N. Pruphetkaew, K. Ruangnapa, Kantara Saelim, Pharsai Prasertsan","doi":"10.17241/smr.2022.01270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective Many studies have supported the potential effect of anti-inflammatory medications treatment for childhood obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intranasal corticosteroid treatment in children with OSA symptoms and adenoid hypertrophy (AH), and to identify factors associated with the treatment outcome.Methods This retrospective study included children aged 1–15 years who snored, had sleeprelated symptoms, and received intranasal corticosteroid treatment for 4–16 weeks. Treatment outcome was considered a success if all symptoms were completely resolved or if the child still snored without sleep-related symptoms; treatment was considered a failure if the child still snored and had concomitant sleep-related symptoms.Results Among the 328 eligible children, 109 (33.2%) experienced treatment failure. The age of the children was significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (median [interquartile range], 5.5 [3.4, 8.4] vs. 4.2 [3.2, 6.3]; p = 0.004). The percentage of children with allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms at follow-up visit was also significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (44% vs. 27.9% with mild AR and 9.2% vs. 4.1% with moderateto-severe AR, p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression revealed a significant association between treatment failure and older age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.13 [1.04–1.23]) and presence of mild AR (2.29 [1.39–3.77]) and moderate-to-severe AR (3.17 [1.20–8.39]).Conclusions Among children with OSA and AH, one-third experienced treatment failure, and the associated factors were older age and presence of AR symptoms.","PeriodicalId":37318,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2022.01270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective Many studies have supported the potential effect of anti-inflammatory medications treatment for childhood obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of intranasal corticosteroid treatment in children with OSA symptoms and adenoid hypertrophy (AH), and to identify factors associated with the treatment outcome.Methods This retrospective study included children aged 1–15 years who snored, had sleeprelated symptoms, and received intranasal corticosteroid treatment for 4–16 weeks. Treatment outcome was considered a success if all symptoms were completely resolved or if the child still snored without sleep-related symptoms; treatment was considered a failure if the child still snored and had concomitant sleep-related symptoms.Results Among the 328 eligible children, 109 (33.2%) experienced treatment failure. The age of the children was significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (median [interquartile range], 5.5 [3.4, 8.4] vs. 4.2 [3.2, 6.3]; p = 0.004). The percentage of children with allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms at follow-up visit was also significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (44% vs. 27.9% with mild AR and 9.2% vs. 4.1% with moderateto-severe AR, p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression revealed a significant association between treatment failure and older age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.13 [1.04–1.23]) and presence of mild AR (2.29 [1.39–3.77]) and moderate-to-severe AR (3.17 [1.20–8.39]).Conclusions Among children with OSA and AH, one-third experienced treatment failure, and the associated factors were older age and presence of AR symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床诊断为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的儿童鼻内皮质类固醇治疗的结果及相关因素
背景与目的许多研究支持抗炎药物治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的潜在效果。本研究旨在评估鼻内皮质类固醇治疗OSA症状和腺样体肥大(AH)儿童的结果,并确定与治疗结果相关的因素。方法本回顾性研究纳入1-15岁有打鼾、有睡眠相关症状并接受鼻内皮质类固醇治疗4-16周的儿童。如果所有症状都完全消除,或者如果儿童仍然打鼾而没有睡眠相关症状,则认为治疗结果是成功的;如果孩子仍然打鼾并伴有睡眠相关症状,则认为治疗失败。结果328例患儿中,109例(33.2%)出现治疗失败。失败组患儿的年龄明显高于成功组(中位数[四分位数间距],5.5[3.4,8.4]对4.2 [3.2,6.3];P = 0.004)。随访时出现变应性鼻炎(AR)症状的儿童比例在失败组也明显高于成功组(轻度AR为44% vs. 27.9%,中重度AR为9.2% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001)。多元logistic回归显示,治疗失败与年龄(优势比[95%可信区间],1.13[1.04-1.23])、轻度AR(2.29[1.39-3.77])和中重度AR(3.17[1.20-8.39])存在显著相关。结论OSA合并AH患儿中有三分之一的患者治疗失败,其相关因素为年龄较大和出现AR症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Research
Sleep Medicine Research Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Clinical Benefits and Limitations Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder: What Is Known and What Should Be Studied Sleep Quality Assessment in Correlation to Autonomic Nerve Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Positional Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Therapeutic Modalities and Clinical Effects Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in a Patient With a History of Tongue Base Tumor Resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1