The importance of optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the glycemic control of older adults with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Data from the study on aging and longevity EELO

Cristina E. Okuyama, Denise Cristine de Oliveira, K. Fernandes, R. Poli-Frederico, S. Diniz, Viviane de Souza Pinho Costa, A. S. Marquez
{"title":"The importance of optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the glycemic control of older adults with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Data from the study on aging and longevity EELO","authors":"Cristina E. Okuyama, Denise Cristine de Oliveira, K. Fernandes, R. Poli-Frederico, S. Diniz, Viviane de Souza Pinho Costa, A. S. Marquez","doi":"10.7322/abcshs.2020128.1583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Optimal serum levels of vitamin D are of great importance, especially in populations with comorbidities such as Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Objective: The study evaluated the relationship between hypovitaminosis D and glycemic control in older adults with type 2 DM. Methods: Cross-sectional and prospective study, part of the EELO project (Study on Aging and Longevity), conducted in Southern Brazil. Glycated hemoglobin (diabetes ≥6.5%) and serum levels of vitamin D (25(OH)D) were evaluated. Hypovitaminosis D was determined using cutoff points <20 and <30 ng/mL). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the risk of having uncontrolled DM. Results: Of the 120 older adults included in the study, aged between 60 and 87 years, 74.2% were women, 66.7% used hypoglycemic medications and 75.8% exhibited uncontrolled diabetes. An inverse correlation was observed between the levels of 25(OH)D and glycated hemoglobin (rS=-0.19, p=0.037), suggesting that low levels of vitamin D are associated with poor glycemic control in diabetic individuals. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D when using the cutoff points of <20 and <30 ng/mL were 34.2% and 75.0%, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) analysis showed that individuals with 25(OH)D<20ng/mL have almost 4 times more risk of having uncontrolled DM (OR:3.94; CI95%:1.25-12.46, p=0.02) when compared to the older adults with sufficient levels of vitamin D. Conclusion: The results indicate that the optimal serum levels currently recommended for 25(OH)D should preferably be 30 ng/mL or higher to contribute to better glycemic control in older adults with type 2 DM. \n ","PeriodicalId":30632,"journal":{"name":"ABCS Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABCS Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2020128.1583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Optimal serum levels of vitamin D are of great importance, especially in populations with comorbidities such as Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Objective: The study evaluated the relationship between hypovitaminosis D and glycemic control in older adults with type 2 DM. Methods: Cross-sectional and prospective study, part of the EELO project (Study on Aging and Longevity), conducted in Southern Brazil. Glycated hemoglobin (diabetes ≥6.5%) and serum levels of vitamin D (25(OH)D) were evaluated. Hypovitaminosis D was determined using cutoff points <20 and <30 ng/mL). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the risk of having uncontrolled DM. Results: Of the 120 older adults included in the study, aged between 60 and 87 years, 74.2% were women, 66.7% used hypoglycemic medications and 75.8% exhibited uncontrolled diabetes. An inverse correlation was observed between the levels of 25(OH)D and glycated hemoglobin (rS=-0.19, p=0.037), suggesting that low levels of vitamin D are associated with poor glycemic control in diabetic individuals. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D when using the cutoff points of <20 and <30 ng/mL were 34.2% and 75.0%, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) analysis showed that individuals with 25(OH)D<20ng/mL have almost 4 times more risk of having uncontrolled DM (OR:3.94; CI95%:1.25-12.46, p=0.02) when compared to the older adults with sufficient levels of vitamin D. Conclusion: The results indicate that the optimal serum levels currently recommended for 25(OH)D should preferably be 30 ng/mL or higher to contribute to better glycemic control in older adults with type 2 DM.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最佳25-羟基维生素D水平在老年2型糖尿病患者血糖控制中的重要性:来自衰老与长寿研究的数据
理想的血清维生素D水平是非常重要的,特别是在有合并症的人群中,如糖尿病(DM)。目的:本研究评估老年2型糖尿病患者维生素D缺乏症与血糖控制之间的关系。方法:横断面和前瞻性研究,EELO项目(衰老与长寿研究)的一部分,在巴西南部进行。评估糖化血红蛋白(糖尿病≥6.5%)和血清维生素D (25(OH)D)水平。维生素缺乏症D的测定采用临界值<20和<30 ng/mL)。多因素logistic回归用于评估未控制糖尿病的风险。结果:研究中纳入的120名年龄在60至87岁之间的老年人中,74.2%为女性,66.7%使用降糖药物,75.8%患有未控制的糖尿病。25(OH)D水平与糖化血红蛋白水平呈负相关(rS=-0.19, p=0.037),表明维生素D水平低与糖尿病患者血糖控制不良有关。当使用<20和<30 ng/mL截断点时,维生素D缺乏症的患病率分别为34.2%和75.0%。比值比(OR)分析显示,25(OH)D<20ng/mL的个体发生未控制DM的风险几乎是其4倍(OR:3.94;结论:目前推荐的25(OH)D的最佳血清水平最好为30 ng/mL或更高,以有助于更好地控制老年2型糖尿病患者的血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of moderate sedation induced by propofol or midazolam on intracranial pressure Association between pulp stones and systemic diseases: A case-control study Red blood cell transfusions in preterm infants in 2021: A Narrative Review Use of antimicrobials in patients in Palliative Care admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A retrospective study Estudo epidemiológico da Hepatite C em pessoas privadas de liberdade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1