Przyjaźń (nie)doskonała w polsko- -bułgarskiej korespondencji Wilhelma Macha i Dymitra Dobrewa

Adriana Kovacheva
{"title":"Przyjaźń (nie)doskonała w polsko- -bułgarskiej korespondencji Wilhelma Macha i Dymitra Dobrewa","authors":"Adriana Kovacheva","doi":"10.14746/pspsl.2019.35.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents Dimitar Dobrev’s perspectives on the literary work of Wilhelm Mach and his understanding of his friendship with the Polish author. The arguments are mainly based on forgotten materials documenting the relationship between Dobrev and Mach. The most interesting aspects of the friendship between the writers are those causing conflicts and misunderstandings. The authors disagree over the definition of realism and the role of literature in the contemporary world, and those differences are intensified by Dobrev’s and Mach’s opposite comprehension of the ideals of a socialist society. The paper’s main topic is how the discrepancies between Mach and Dobrev influence their style and – particularly in Mach’s case – how they affect his experimental prose. The disagreements between the writers are both frustrating and inspiring for them as authors and they also distort the perception of Mach’s work as presented for his Bulgarian readers in Dobrev’s essays.","PeriodicalId":31050,"journal":{"name":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pspsl.2019.35.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents Dimitar Dobrev’s perspectives on the literary work of Wilhelm Mach and his understanding of his friendship with the Polish author. The arguments are mainly based on forgotten materials documenting the relationship between Dobrev and Mach. The most interesting aspects of the friendship between the writers are those causing conflicts and misunderstandings. The authors disagree over the definition of realism and the role of literature in the contemporary world, and those differences are intensified by Dobrev’s and Mach’s opposite comprehension of the ideals of a socialist society. The paper’s main topic is how the discrepancies between Mach and Dobrev influence their style and – particularly in Mach’s case – how they affect his experimental prose. The disagreements between the writers are both frustrating and inspiring for them as authors and they also distort the perception of Mach’s work as presented for his Bulgarian readers in Dobrev’s essays.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文介绍了迪米塔尔·杜波夫对威廉·马赫文学作品的看法,以及他对与这位波兰作家友谊的理解。争论主要基于被遗忘的记录杜波夫和马赫之间关系的材料。作者之间的友谊最有趣的方面是那些引起冲突和误解。作者对现实主义的定义和文学在当代世界中的作用存在分歧,杜波夫和马赫对社会主义社会理想的相反理解加剧了这些分歧。这篇论文的主要主题是马赫和杜波夫之间的差异是如何影响他们的风格的,尤其是在马赫的例子中,它们是如何影响他的实验散文的。作者之间的分歧对作为作者的他们来说既令人沮丧又鼓舞人心,而且他们也扭曲了杜波夫在随笔中为保加利亚读者呈现的马赫作品的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Podróże z Hanną Szumańską-Grossową „Dobra reprodukcja obrazów”. „Dzieło” Émile’a Zoli w przekładach Aleksandry Callierowej i Hanny Szumańskiej-Grossowej Angielskie strofy i polska lutnia. O przekładach „Melodii hebrajskich” George’a Gordona Byrona pióra Antoniego Edwarda Odyńca Światopogląd jako styl. „Klucze Piotrowe” Rogera Peyrefitte’a w przekładzie Hanny Szumańskiej-Grossowej jako ogniwo tradycji Hanna Szumańska-Grossowa wspomina Konstantego Ildefonsa Gałczyńskiego
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1