The influence of musical production structures in group learning management

Lucas Baño, J. Pozo
{"title":"The influence of musical production structures in group learning management","authors":"Lucas Baño, J. Pozo","doi":"10.1177/1321103x231175389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite research indicating the advantages of collaborative learning, most formal music education continues to be in an individual format. However, collaborative strategies have been observed in other musical cultures. Through this research, we wished to study the differences in the management of group practices between three musical cultures (classical, modern, and flamenco), checking whether they originate in the formal/informal nature of their cultural tools or their mode of musical production. For this purpose, we analyzed three musical groups belonging to these three musical cultures. Each group comprised four musicians. Recordings of the rehearsal sessions and three dimensions of learning (outcomes, processes, and conditions) were categorically analyzed using the system for the analysis of instrumental learning developed by our research group. Chi-square and adjusted standardized residuals analyses demonstrated that the learning outcomes in each culture differed according to the cultural tool used (literacy, orality, or mimetic), but that the processes and social interaction differed according to the mode of musical production. The findings suggested that those who approach music from open production structures, such as modern musicians, are more collaborative than those who approach it from closed structures, such as classical and flamenco musicians. We conclude by reflecting on the origin of these production structures, highlighting the need to work from different modes of musical production in educational spaces.","PeriodicalId":45954,"journal":{"name":"Research Studies in Music Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Studies in Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x231175389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite research indicating the advantages of collaborative learning, most formal music education continues to be in an individual format. However, collaborative strategies have been observed in other musical cultures. Through this research, we wished to study the differences in the management of group practices between three musical cultures (classical, modern, and flamenco), checking whether they originate in the formal/informal nature of their cultural tools or their mode of musical production. For this purpose, we analyzed three musical groups belonging to these three musical cultures. Each group comprised four musicians. Recordings of the rehearsal sessions and three dimensions of learning (outcomes, processes, and conditions) were categorically analyzed using the system for the analysis of instrumental learning developed by our research group. Chi-square and adjusted standardized residuals analyses demonstrated that the learning outcomes in each culture differed according to the cultural tool used (literacy, orality, or mimetic), but that the processes and social interaction differed according to the mode of musical production. The findings suggested that those who approach music from open production structures, such as modern musicians, are more collaborative than those who approach it from closed structures, such as classical and flamenco musicians. We conclude by reflecting on the origin of these production structures, highlighting the need to work from different modes of musical production in educational spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐制作结构对团体学习管理的影响
尽管研究表明了合作学习的优势,但大多数正规音乐教育仍然采用个人形式。然而,在其他音乐文化中也发现了合作策略。通过这项研究,我们希望研究三种音乐文化(古典、现代和弗拉门戈)在团体实践管理方面的差异,检查它们是否源于其文化工具的正式/非正式性质或音乐生产模式。为此,我们分析了属于这三种音乐文化的三个音乐群体。每组由四位音乐家组成。使用我们研究小组开发的器乐学习分析系统,对排练录音和学习的三个维度(结果、过程和条件)进行分类分析。卡方分析和调整后的标准化残差分析表明,每种文化中的学习结果根据所使用的文化工具(识字、口语或模仿)而有所不同,但过程和社会互动根据音乐制作模式而有所不同。研究结果表明,那些从开放的生产结构中学习音乐的人,如现代音乐家,比那些从封闭的结构中学习音乐的人,如古典和弗拉门戈音乐家,更善于合作。最后,我们反思了这些生产结构的起源,强调了在教育空间中从不同的音乐生产模式进行工作的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
37.50%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Research Studies in Music Education is an internationally peer-reviewed journal that promotes the dissemination and discussion of high quality research in music and music education. The journal encourages the interrogation and development of a range of research methodologies and their application to diverse topics in music education theory and practice. The journal covers a wide range of topics across all areas of music education, and a separate "Perspectives in Music Education Research" section provides a forum for researchers to discuss topics of special interest and to debate key issues in the profession.
期刊最新文献
Digital game–based learning in music education: A systematic review between 2011 and 2023 The meanings of professional development: Perspectives of Malaysian piano teachers Investigating if and how string teachers instruct and support the self-regulation of students’ practice in online lessons The storyline approach as a didactic tool to promote efficacy beliefs of (student) teachers in creative music activities with young children Community musicking and musical cognition among adungu music communities of the Acholi people from Awach, Gulu district, Northern Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1