Affiliation to alcoholics anonymous or narcotics anonymous among patients attending an English specialist addiction service

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology Drugs and Alcohol Today Pub Date : 2019-10-23 DOI:10.1108/dat-05-2019-0017
E. Day, Sabrina Kirberg, N. Metrebian
{"title":"Affiliation to alcoholics anonymous or narcotics anonymous among patients attending an English specialist addiction service","authors":"E. Day, Sabrina Kirberg, N. Metrebian","doi":"10.1108/dat-05-2019-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAttendance at alcoholics anonymous (AA) or narcotics anonymous (NA) meetings and affiliation with the fellowship has potential benefits for people with alcohol or drug use disorders. This effect is present whether or not the individual attends professional treatment services, but the two process can have a synergistic effect. Limited information exists about the extent to which people attending UK specialist treatment services also attend AA/NA and their views about such attendance. The paper aims to discuss these issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA cross-sectional survey of 200 consecutive attendees at the specialist treatment service in an English region was conducted between January and April 2018. A measure of past attendance and affiliation with AA/NA (AAAS) and a scale designed to quantify future readiness to attend (Survey of Readiness for Alcoholics Anonymous Participation) were administered and anonymously linked to data supplied to the National Drug Treatment Monitoring Service (NDTMS).\n\n\nFindings\nA minority of the sample had ever attended an AA meeting (31 per cent, n=59) or an NA meeting (41 per cent, n=79), and only 14 per cent (n=27) and 24 per cent (n=45) had attended an AA or NA meeting, respectively, in the past year. Only two variables significantly predicted level of readiness to attend AA or NA in a regression model: attended more AA/NA meetings in the past (ß=0.149, p=0.036) and previous level of participation (AAAS score) (ß=0.409, p < 0.001).\n\n\nPractical implications\nA significant proportion of attendees of a specialist drug and alcohol treatment service had never attended AA/NA, despite many positive views about their potential benefits. Given the established benefits of attending AA/NA meetings and participating in the AA or NA fellowship, these results suggest that professional treatment services should do more to explain the process and challenge preconceived ideas about how they operate.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors are not aware of any published research that captures the rates of attendance of and participation in both AA and NA groups in a UK-based community treatment sample. These results may therefore provide a baseline for evaluating the impact of interventions to increase attendance/participation, and also provide some insight into the potential barriers to attendance in this population.\n","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/dat-05-2019-0017","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dat-05-2019-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Attendance at alcoholics anonymous (AA) or narcotics anonymous (NA) meetings and affiliation with the fellowship has potential benefits for people with alcohol or drug use disorders. This effect is present whether or not the individual attends professional treatment services, but the two process can have a synergistic effect. Limited information exists about the extent to which people attending UK specialist treatment services also attend AA/NA and their views about such attendance. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey of 200 consecutive attendees at the specialist treatment service in an English region was conducted between January and April 2018. A measure of past attendance and affiliation with AA/NA (AAAS) and a scale designed to quantify future readiness to attend (Survey of Readiness for Alcoholics Anonymous Participation) were administered and anonymously linked to data supplied to the National Drug Treatment Monitoring Service (NDTMS). Findings A minority of the sample had ever attended an AA meeting (31 per cent, n=59) or an NA meeting (41 per cent, n=79), and only 14 per cent (n=27) and 24 per cent (n=45) had attended an AA or NA meeting, respectively, in the past year. Only two variables significantly predicted level of readiness to attend AA or NA in a regression model: attended more AA/NA meetings in the past (ß=0.149, p=0.036) and previous level of participation (AAAS score) (ß=0.409, p < 0.001). Practical implications A significant proportion of attendees of a specialist drug and alcohol treatment service had never attended AA/NA, despite many positive views about their potential benefits. Given the established benefits of attending AA/NA meetings and participating in the AA or NA fellowship, these results suggest that professional treatment services should do more to explain the process and challenge preconceived ideas about how they operate. Originality/value The authors are not aware of any published research that captures the rates of attendance of and participation in both AA and NA groups in a UK-based community treatment sample. These results may therefore provide a baseline for evaluating the impact of interventions to increase attendance/participation, and also provide some insight into the potential barriers to attendance in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参加英国专家戒毒服务的患者与嗜酒者或麻醉品匿名者的关系
目的参加嗜酒者匿名会(AA)或麻醉品匿名会(NA)并加入该协会对有酒精或药物使用障碍的人有潜在的好处。无论个人是否参加专业治疗服务,这种影响都存在,但这两个过程可以产生协同效应。关于参加英国专业治疗服务的人参加AA/NA的程度以及他们对这种出席的看法的信息有限。本文旨在探讨这些问题。设计/方法/方法在2018年1月至4月期间,对英国某地区专业治疗服务的200名连续参与者进行了横断面调查。对过去参加AA/NA (AAAS)的人数和隶属关系进行了测量,并设计了一个量表来量化未来参加的准备情况(匿名参与酗酒者准备情况调查),并匿名地与提供给国家药物治疗监测服务(NDTMS)的数据相关联。少数样本曾经参加过嗜酒者互诫会(31%,n=59)或嗜酒者互诫会(41%,n=79),在过去一年中分别只有14% (n=27)和24% (n=45)参加过嗜酒者互诫会或嗜酒者互诫会。在回归模型中,只有两个变量显著预测参加AA或NA的准备水平:过去参加过更多的AA/NA会议(ß=0.149, p=0.036)和以前的参与水平(AAAS评分)(ß=0.409, p < 0.001)。尽管许多人对戒毒和戒酒专家治疗服务的潜在益处持积极看法,但很大一部分戒毒和戒酒专家从未参加过戒毒和戒酒协会。鉴于参加AA/NA会议和参加AA或NA奖学金的既定好处,这些结果表明,专业治疗服务应该做更多的工作来解释这一过程,并挑战对其运作方式的先入为主的看法。原创性/价值作者不知道有任何已发表的研究记录了英国社区治疗样本中AA和NA小组的出勤率和参与率。因此,这些结果可能为评估提高出勤率/参与率的干预措施的影响提供基线,并为这一人群出勤的潜在障碍提供一些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The misuse of drugs act – a user perspective More harm than good? Cannabis, harm and the misuse of drugs act Risk perception, health stressors and reduction in sharing cannabis products during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study From law to regulation: re-appraising the misuse of Drugs Act 1971 Fifty years of the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971: the legislative contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1