Killing a “Monster”: Lisa Montgomery, Carceral Logics, and the Rhetoric of Sexual Trauma

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Womens Studies in Communication Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1080/07491409.2023.2171935
Stephanie R. Larson
{"title":"Killing a “Monster”: Lisa Montgomery, Carceral Logics, and the Rhetoric of Sexual Trauma","authors":"Stephanie R. Larson","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2023.2171935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What happens when we treat sexual trauma as a disability? This article examines the federal execution case of Lisa Montgomery, who murdered Bobbie Jo Stinnett and kidnapped her baby, with this question as its motivation. Prior to execution, dozens of clemency petitions circulated publicly, revealing how Montgomery was repeatedly subjected to instances of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse across her lifetime, generating robust commentary about mental disability and sexual violence. I argue that these petitions—even in their effort to retrain public opinion of how Montgomery’s history shaped her actions—upheld carceral logics that insisted Montgomery must pay for her bodymind, reinforcing the idea that mentally ill women do not belong in the public sphere. By carving critical space for sexual violence within feminist disability studies, this article demonstrates how the tensions that ensue when categorizing the aftermath of sexual trauma as a disability result from a discursive incapacity of the state.","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":"46 1","pages":"117 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2023.2171935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract What happens when we treat sexual trauma as a disability? This article examines the federal execution case of Lisa Montgomery, who murdered Bobbie Jo Stinnett and kidnapped her baby, with this question as its motivation. Prior to execution, dozens of clemency petitions circulated publicly, revealing how Montgomery was repeatedly subjected to instances of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse across her lifetime, generating robust commentary about mental disability and sexual violence. I argue that these petitions—even in their effort to retrain public opinion of how Montgomery’s history shaped her actions—upheld carceral logics that insisted Montgomery must pay for her bodymind, reinforcing the idea that mentally ill women do not belong in the public sphere. By carving critical space for sexual violence within feminist disability studies, this article demonstrates how the tensions that ensue when categorizing the aftermath of sexual trauma as a disability result from a discursive incapacity of the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杀死“怪物”:丽莎·蒙哥马利、葬礼逻辑与性创伤修辞
当我们将性创伤视为一种残疾时会发生什么?本文以这个问题为动机,考察了联邦政府对丽莎·蒙哥马利(Lisa Montgomery)的死刑判决,她谋杀了博比·乔·斯廷内特(Bobbie Jo Stinnett)并绑架了她的孩子。在执行死刑之前,数十份宽恕请愿书公开流传,揭露了蒙哥马利一生中如何反复遭受性虐待、身体虐待和精神虐待,引发了关于精神残疾和性暴力的强烈评论。我认为,这些请愿书——即使是在努力让公众重新认识到蒙哥马利的经历如何影响了她的行为——支持了坚持蒙哥马利必须为她的身心付出代价的顽固逻辑,强化了精神疾病女性不属于公共领域的观点。通过在女权主义残疾研究中为性暴力开辟关键空间,本文展示了当将性创伤的后果归类为残疾时,随之而来的紧张局势是如何由国家的话语无能造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Palestine on the Air Feminist Mentoring in Academia Grassroots Activisms: Public Rhetorics in Localized Contexts Mean Girl Feminism Mommy Needs Her Chardonnay in a Sippy Cup: How Mothers Make Sense of “Wine Mom” Messages and Their Effects on Mothering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1