Work values and hybrid careers in the gig economy: The evidence from an online labor market

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Economic and Industrial Democracy Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.1177/0143831x221140153
A. Shevchuk, D. Strebkov, Dieter Bögenhold
{"title":"Work values and hybrid careers in the gig economy: The evidence from an online labor market","authors":"A. Shevchuk, D. Strebkov, Dieter Bögenhold","doi":"10.1177/0143831x221140153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current debates about the gig economy pay increasing attention to the heterogeneity of platform workers. Using a large sample of 10,574 freelancers from an international online labor market, this article investigates the association between individual work values and career trajectories, constructed as a combination of current employment status and future career intentions. The authors consider not only the pure form of freelancing but also hybrid models when people have multiple jobs, combining freelancing with a regular job as an employee (moonlighters) or starting their own business with hired employees (entrepreneurs). The findings suggest that freelancers, moonlighters, and entrepreneurs have distinct work value profiles reflecting the opportunities and constraints in gaining specific rewards from their work. In contrast to moonlighters, freelancers and entrepreneurs are similar in their relative preference for intrinsic values and ignoring security values. In contrast to freelancers, entrepreneurs and moonlighters value social recognition but do not seek a comfortable job. In contrast to entrepreneurs, freelancers and moonlighters prefer a job that meets their abilities. The authors argue that different work values must be better acknowledged when trying to reflect adequately on participation and mobility in the gig economy. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of the gig economy as well as to the general literature on the role of work values in labor markets.","PeriodicalId":47456,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x221140153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Current debates about the gig economy pay increasing attention to the heterogeneity of platform workers. Using a large sample of 10,574 freelancers from an international online labor market, this article investigates the association between individual work values and career trajectories, constructed as a combination of current employment status and future career intentions. The authors consider not only the pure form of freelancing but also hybrid models when people have multiple jobs, combining freelancing with a regular job as an employee (moonlighters) or starting their own business with hired employees (entrepreneurs). The findings suggest that freelancers, moonlighters, and entrepreneurs have distinct work value profiles reflecting the opportunities and constraints in gaining specific rewards from their work. In contrast to moonlighters, freelancers and entrepreneurs are similar in their relative preference for intrinsic values and ignoring security values. In contrast to freelancers, entrepreneurs and moonlighters value social recognition but do not seek a comfortable job. In contrast to entrepreneurs, freelancers and moonlighters prefer a job that meets their abilities. The authors argue that different work values must be better acknowledged when trying to reflect adequately on participation and mobility in the gig economy. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of the gig economy as well as to the general literature on the role of work values in labor markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零工经济中的工作价值观和混合职业:来自在线劳动力市场的证据
目前关于零工经济的争论越来越关注平台工人的异质性。本文以国际在线劳动力市场的10574名自由职业者为样本,研究了个人工作价值观与职业轨迹之间的关系,并将其构建为当前就业状况和未来职业意向的结合。作者不仅考虑了纯粹的自由职业形式,还考虑了混合模式,即人们拥有多种工作,将自由职业与作为雇员的固定工作(兼职者)结合起来,或者与雇佣的员工(企业家)一起创业。研究结果表明,自由职业者、兼职者和企业家有不同的工作价值概况,反映了他们从工作中获得特定回报的机会和限制。与兼职者相比,自由职业者和企业家在相对偏好内在价值和忽视安全价值方面是相似的。与自由职业者相比,企业家和兼职者看重社会认可,但不寻求一份舒适的工作。与企业家相比,自由职业者和兼职者更喜欢能满足他们能力的工作。作者认为,在试图充分反映零工经济中的参与性和流动性时,必须更好地认识到不同的工作价值观。这项研究有助于更深入地了解零工经济,以及关于工作价值观在劳动力市场中的作用的一般文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Economic and Industrial Democracy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Economic and Industrial Democracy is an international peer reviewed journal that focuses on the study of initiatives designed to enhance the quality of working life through extending the democratic control of workers over the workplace and the economy. How those initiatives are affected by wider political, economic and technological factors are also of interest. Special emphasis is laid on international coverage of empirical material, including discussions of the social and economic conditions in various countries.
期刊最新文献
The employee representation plan movement in the United States 1913–1935: The attempted legitimation of novel organizational forms Neoliberalism by stealth? Labour reforms and institutional discontinuity in worker representation in France Crafting alternative work organisations: Paradoxes of workplace democracy and emancipation in worker-buyout cooperatives The union default: Increasing union membership by facilitating the experience of unionism and overcoming the role of inertia Elucidating the relationship between high-investment HR systems and workforce engagement: The role of employee education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1