Quality evaluation of pulp powder and the developed functional jam from African locust bean fruit

P. Akubor
{"title":"Quality evaluation of pulp powder and the developed functional jam from African locust bean fruit","authors":"P. Akubor","doi":"10.17508/cjfst.2023.15.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pulp powder was prepared from fruits of African locust bean tree and used to produce jam. The pulp and jam were analyzed for the chemical composition, physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties. The total soluble solids of the pulp and jam were 25.5 and 72.5 oBrix, respectively. The pulp had pH of 5.3, while the pH of the jam was 3.3. The jam had higher total titratable acidity than the pulp. The jam contained higher crude protein (3.16 %), crude fat (1.03%), ash (4.3%) and carbohydrate (76.044%) contents than the pulp. The crude protein, fat, ash and carbohydrate contents of the pulp were 2.86, 0.85, 2.93 and 68.81%, respectively. The energy content of the jam was also higher than that of the pulp. The flavonoids, carotenoids, tannins, oxalates, phytates, saponins and alkaloids contents of the jam were lower than those of the pulp. The total sugars, reducing sugars, glucose, fructose and sucrose contents of the pulp were 7.7, 10.7, 5. 5, 4.8 and 5.8%, respectively, while those of the jam were 75.5, 47.6, 20.3, 30.3 and 21.68%, respectively. The vitamins B1, B2 and C contents of the pulp were 122, 35 and 35 mg/100g, respectively and decreased to 113, 10.2 and 22mg/100g, respectively, in the jam. The citric acid increased from 12.9 in the pulp to 15.6mg/100gin the jam. The P, K, Mg, Cu, Zn and Ca contents of the jam were higher than those of the pulp, while the Na and Fe contents of the pulp were higher than those of the jam. The total plate counts of the pulp and the pulp jam were 4.0 x104 and 1.2 x 101, respectively. The yeast and mould counts of pulp were 2.4 x104, while that of the jam was 0.3 x 101. The commercial plum jam was rated higher than the pulp jam for all the sensory attributes assessed except spreadability and overall acceptability.","PeriodicalId":10771,"journal":{"name":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17508/cjfst.2023.15.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pulp powder was prepared from fruits of African locust bean tree and used to produce jam. The pulp and jam were analyzed for the chemical composition, physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties. The total soluble solids of the pulp and jam were 25.5 and 72.5 oBrix, respectively. The pulp had pH of 5.3, while the pH of the jam was 3.3. The jam had higher total titratable acidity than the pulp. The jam contained higher crude protein (3.16 %), crude fat (1.03%), ash (4.3%) and carbohydrate (76.044%) contents than the pulp. The crude protein, fat, ash and carbohydrate contents of the pulp were 2.86, 0.85, 2.93 and 68.81%, respectively. The energy content of the jam was also higher than that of the pulp. The flavonoids, carotenoids, tannins, oxalates, phytates, saponins and alkaloids contents of the jam were lower than those of the pulp. The total sugars, reducing sugars, glucose, fructose and sucrose contents of the pulp were 7.7, 10.7, 5. 5, 4.8 and 5.8%, respectively, while those of the jam were 75.5, 47.6, 20.3, 30.3 and 21.68%, respectively. The vitamins B1, B2 and C contents of the pulp were 122, 35 and 35 mg/100g, respectively and decreased to 113, 10.2 and 22mg/100g, respectively, in the jam. The citric acid increased from 12.9 in the pulp to 15.6mg/100gin the jam. The P, K, Mg, Cu, Zn and Ca contents of the jam were higher than those of the pulp, while the Na and Fe contents of the pulp were higher than those of the jam. The total plate counts of the pulp and the pulp jam were 4.0 x104 and 1.2 x 101, respectively. The yeast and mould counts of pulp were 2.4 x104, while that of the jam was 0.3 x 101. The commercial plum jam was rated higher than the pulp jam for all the sensory attributes assessed except spreadability and overall acceptability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺槐豆果浆粉及功能性果酱的品质评价
以非洲刺槐豆树的果实为原料制备浆粉,用于制作果酱。对果肉和果酱进行了化学成分、理化、微生物和感官性能分析。果肉和果酱的可溶性固形物总量分别为25.5 oBrix和72.5 oBrix。果肉pH值为5.3,果酱pH值为3.3。果酱的总可滴定酸度高于果肉。果酱的粗蛋白质(3.16%)、粗脂肪(1.03%)、灰分(4.3%)和碳水化合物(76.044%)含量均高于果肉。果肉粗蛋白质、粗脂肪、粗灰分和粗碳水化合物含量分别为2.86、0.85、2.93和68.81%。果酱的能量含量也高于果肉。果酱中黄酮类、类胡萝卜素、单宁、草酸、植酸、皂苷和生物碱的含量均低于果肉。果肉总糖、还原糖、葡萄糖、果糖和蔗糖含量分别为7.7、10.7、5。分别为5、4.8、5.8%和75.5、47.6、20.3、30.3、21.68%。果肉中维生素B1、B2和C含量分别为122、35和35 mg/100g,果酱中维生素B1、B2和C含量分别降至113、10.2和22mg/100g。柠檬酸含量由果肉中的12.9 mg/100gin提高到果酱中的15.6mg/100gin。果酱的P、K、Mg、Cu、Zn和Ca含量高于果肉,果肉的Na和Fe含量高于果酱。纸浆和果酱的总板数分别为4.0 × 104和1.2 × 101。果肉酵母菌数为2.4 × 104,果酱酵母菌数为0.3 × 101。除涂抹性和总体可接受性外,商品梅酱的所有感官指标均高于纸浆果酱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parametric statistical analysis of microbiological water quality indicators Pro-vitamin A content of red palm oil emulsions formed with malted bambara groundnut, Brachystegia eurycoma (achi) and cowpea Chemical and antioxidant properties of two non-dairy probiotic drinks produced from tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) and soybean (Glycine max) Standardization of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for measuring xylanase activity Effects of roasting conditions on sensory attributes, polyphenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1