Industrial and engineering heritage in Europe, 50 winners of the European Heritage Awards/Europa Nostra Awards

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Industrial Archaeology Review Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03090728.2021.1903696
Keith Falconer
{"title":"Industrial and engineering heritage in Europe, 50 winners of the European Heritage Awards/Europa Nostra Awards","authors":"Keith Falconer","doi":"10.1080/03090728.2021.1903696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"societies. Subsequent chapters document this continued growth through to the 1960s, with the CWS moving into financial and other services and needing ever-larger offices, warehouses and factories, and the retail societies expanding into department stores and, later, supermarkets. The CWS also set up its own chains of shops, under what was to become Co-operative Retail Services (CRS) to enable it to expand into areas of the country where there were no local societies. The buildings constructed by CWS were often of the highest quality, but, due to the independence of the local societies, in widely disparate architectural styles, which included some fine examples of art deco, moderne and modernist architecture and decoration. From the mid-1960s, however, the Co-operative model, with ‘brand loyalty’ founded on membership and dividends, began to lose ground to the expanding supermarket chains, whose less bureaucratic and more centralised management and distribution allowed them to operate with lower margins. Local societies closed or consolidated, and many were absorbed into the CWS, whose manufacturing enterprises largely closed, or by CRS. The number of larger shops declined and the emphasis switched to convenience stores, to the extent that, to the customer, the Co-op today appears little different from other retailers, with little hint of its ideologically driven past. Lynn Pearson does not attempt to describe the entire history of the Co-operative movement through its built heritage, but rather to demonstrate how it presented its values through its architecture. She describes in detail the growth of the CWS architectural team, as well as the contributions of other architects. In addition to the aesthetics, we learn something of the construction techniques their architects favoured, particularly the pioneering adoption of Hennebique ferro-concrete structural systems in the early 20th century. However, this focus on the public-facing architecture means we learn little about the Cooperative movement’s farms or the housing it built for its workers. We receive tantalising glimpses of the internal organisation of their stores (including those fascinating systems for moving money around), but not of their warehouses and factories. I suspect some readers of this journal might wish to learn more about how these buildings operated, and whether this was in any way different from those of businesses founded on less idealistic principles, but this is an architectural history, as proclaimed in the book’s title, not an archaeological study. It might also have been valuable to understand a little more about the role of the early Co-ops in the educational and social lives of their communities, alongside, for example, Mechanics’ Institutes, but that must wait for another book, perhaps. Liverpool University Press are to be congratulated in seeking to maintain the high standard of production to which we grew accustomed from Historic England. It is true that this volume is smaller in format than the A4-sized volumes that Historic England published to great acclaim, so the illustrations (and their captions) are reduced accordingly. However, the photographs, including many historic images from the author’s personal collection, combine with the well-researched text to create a fantastic resource for social as well as architectural history.","PeriodicalId":42635,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Archaeology Review","volume":"43 1","pages":"76 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03090728.2021.1903696","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Archaeology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03090728.2021.1903696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

societies. Subsequent chapters document this continued growth through to the 1960s, with the CWS moving into financial and other services and needing ever-larger offices, warehouses and factories, and the retail societies expanding into department stores and, later, supermarkets. The CWS also set up its own chains of shops, under what was to become Co-operative Retail Services (CRS) to enable it to expand into areas of the country where there were no local societies. The buildings constructed by CWS were often of the highest quality, but, due to the independence of the local societies, in widely disparate architectural styles, which included some fine examples of art deco, moderne and modernist architecture and decoration. From the mid-1960s, however, the Co-operative model, with ‘brand loyalty’ founded on membership and dividends, began to lose ground to the expanding supermarket chains, whose less bureaucratic and more centralised management and distribution allowed them to operate with lower margins. Local societies closed or consolidated, and many were absorbed into the CWS, whose manufacturing enterprises largely closed, or by CRS. The number of larger shops declined and the emphasis switched to convenience stores, to the extent that, to the customer, the Co-op today appears little different from other retailers, with little hint of its ideologically driven past. Lynn Pearson does not attempt to describe the entire history of the Co-operative movement through its built heritage, but rather to demonstrate how it presented its values through its architecture. She describes in detail the growth of the CWS architectural team, as well as the contributions of other architects. In addition to the aesthetics, we learn something of the construction techniques their architects favoured, particularly the pioneering adoption of Hennebique ferro-concrete structural systems in the early 20th century. However, this focus on the public-facing architecture means we learn little about the Cooperative movement’s farms or the housing it built for its workers. We receive tantalising glimpses of the internal organisation of their stores (including those fascinating systems for moving money around), but not of their warehouses and factories. I suspect some readers of this journal might wish to learn more about how these buildings operated, and whether this was in any way different from those of businesses founded on less idealistic principles, but this is an architectural history, as proclaimed in the book’s title, not an archaeological study. It might also have been valuable to understand a little more about the role of the early Co-ops in the educational and social lives of their communities, alongside, for example, Mechanics’ Institutes, but that must wait for another book, perhaps. Liverpool University Press are to be congratulated in seeking to maintain the high standard of production to which we grew accustomed from Historic England. It is true that this volume is smaller in format than the A4-sized volumes that Historic England published to great acclaim, so the illustrations (and their captions) are reduced accordingly. However, the photographs, including many historic images from the author’s personal collection, combine with the well-researched text to create a fantastic resource for social as well as architectural history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲工业和工程遗产,50位欧洲遗产奖/Europa Nostra奖得主
社会。随后的章节记录了这种持续的增长,直到20世纪60年代,CWS进入金融和其他服务领域,需要更大的办公室、仓库和工厂,零售协会扩展到百货商店,后来是超市。CWS还建立了自己的连锁店,在后来的合作零售服务(CRS)下,使其能够扩展到该国没有当地协会的地区。CWS建造的建筑通常是最高质量的,但由于当地社会的独立性,建筑风格迥异,其中包括一些装饰艺术,现代和现代主义建筑和装饰的优秀例子。然而,从20世纪60年代中期开始,以会员资格和分红为基础的“品牌忠诚度”的合作社模式,开始被不断扩张的连锁超市所取代,连锁超市的官僚作风较少,管理和分销更加集中,这使得它们的利润率较低。地方社团关闭或合并,许多被CWS吸收,其制造企业大多关闭,或被CRS吸收。大型商店的数量减少了,重点转向了便利店,以至于在顾客看来,今天的Co-op与其他零售商没有什么不同,几乎没有意识形态驱动的过去的迹象。林恩·皮尔森并没有试图通过其建筑遗产来描述合作社运动的整个历史,而是展示了它是如何通过其建筑来体现其价值的。她详细描述了CWS架构团队的成长,以及其他架构师的贡献。除了美学之外,我们还学习了他们的建筑师所青睐的建筑技术,特别是20世纪初Hennebique钢筋混凝土结构系统的开创性采用。然而,这种对面向公众的建筑的关注意味着我们对合作社运动的农场或它为工人建造的住房知之甚少。我们对他们商店的内部组织(包括那些迷人的资金周转系统)有了一些诱人的了解,但对他们的仓库和工厂却没有了解。我怀疑这本杂志的一些读者可能希望更多地了解这些建筑是如何运作的,以及这与那些建立在不那么理想主义原则基础上的企业是否有任何不同,但正如本书标题所宣称的那样,这是一部建筑史,而不是一项考古研究。更多地了解早期合作社在社区教育和社会生活中的作用,也可能是有价值的,比如力学学院,但这可能要等到另一本书了。值得祝贺的是,利物浦大学出版社在努力保持高水准的生产,这是我们从历史悠久的英格兰成长起来的习惯。的确,这本书的格式比英国历史博物馆出版的广受好评的a4尺寸的书要小,所以插图(及其说明文字)也相应减少了。然而,这些照片,包括作者个人收藏的许多历史图像,与经过充分研究的文本相结合,为社会史和建筑史创造了一个奇妙的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Industrial Archaeology Review aims to publish research in industrial archaeology, which is defined as a period study embracing the tangible evidence of social, economic and technological development in the period since industrialisation, generally from the early-18th century onwards. It is a peer-reviewed academic journal, with scholarly standards of presentation, yet seeks to encourage submissions from both amateurs and professionals which will inform all those working in the field of current developments. Industrial Archaeology Review is the journal of the Association for Industrial Archaeology. Published twice a year, the focal point and common theme of its contents is the surviving evidence of industrial activity.
期刊最新文献
The Buildings of the Malting Industry: the Production of Malt from Prehistory to the 21st Century Dam Construction, Company Towns and Planned Urban Development: The Example of Salto del Esla, Spain Resolving an Enigma: The Discovery of a Continuous Annular Tunnel Kiln at the Royal Doulton Potteries, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent Rediscovering Copperopolis: The Hafod Plate Rolling Mill, Swansea The Coming of the Railway: A New Global History, 1750–1850
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1