The impact of COVID-19 quarantine on mental health: an observational study from an outpatient service for non-psychotic patients in Russia (Moscow)

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Care Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.4081/ecj.2023.10994
Mickail Zinchuk, M. Beghi, G. Castelpietra, S. Ferrari, E. Pashnin, A. Guekht
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 quarantine on mental health: an observational study from an outpatient service for non-psychotic patients in Russia (Moscow)","authors":"Mickail Zinchuk, M. Beghi, G. Castelpietra, S. Ferrari, E. Pashnin, A. Guekht","doi":"10.4081/ecj.2023.10994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to compare psychiatric hospital visits during the COVID-19 quarantine period with the same period in 2019, to reveal the predictors of underutilization of mental health services. We then investigated the fluctuation of telemedicine service during the quarantine period. The retrospective study included patients with non-psychotic mental disorders who consecutively visited the Moscow clinic. The number of outpatient visits, inpatient admissions, sociodemographic factors were analyzed. We assessed the sample within two periods - the “quarantine period” (March 30 - June 9, 2020) and “control period” (March 30 - June 9, 2019). Psychiatric visits decreased in older, retired and disabled persons, and increased among the unemployed. In multivariate analysis, the reduction became significant for the number of inpatient admissions. Telemedicine calls gradually increased from the start of the service, but decreased towards the end of the quarantine. In conclusion, referrals to outpatient and inpatient psychiatric services decreased during the quarantine period, with newly established TMS potentially compensating for that decrease. The strongest factor associated with visits during the pandemic is employment status.","PeriodicalId":51984,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Care Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.10994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We aimed to compare psychiatric hospital visits during the COVID-19 quarantine period with the same period in 2019, to reveal the predictors of underutilization of mental health services. We then investigated the fluctuation of telemedicine service during the quarantine period. The retrospective study included patients with non-psychotic mental disorders who consecutively visited the Moscow clinic. The number of outpatient visits, inpatient admissions, sociodemographic factors were analyzed. We assessed the sample within two periods - the “quarantine period” (March 30 - June 9, 2020) and “control period” (March 30 - June 9, 2019). Psychiatric visits decreased in older, retired and disabled persons, and increased among the unemployed. In multivariate analysis, the reduction became significant for the number of inpatient admissions. Telemedicine calls gradually increased from the start of the service, but decreased towards the end of the quarantine. In conclusion, referrals to outpatient and inpatient psychiatric services decreased during the quarantine period, with newly established TMS potentially compensating for that decrease. The strongest factor associated with visits during the pandemic is employment status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎隔离对心理健康的影响:俄罗斯非精神病患者门诊服务的观察性研究(莫斯科)
我们旨在将新冠肺炎隔离期间的精神病医院就诊情况与2019年同期进行比较,以揭示精神卫生服务利用不足的预测因素。然后,我们调查了隔离期间远程医疗服务的波动情况。这项回顾性研究包括连续访问莫斯科诊所的非精神病性精神障碍患者。分析了门诊就诊次数、住院人数、社会人口学因素。我们在两个时期内对样本进行了评估,即“隔离期”(2020年3月30日至6月9日)和“控制期”(2019年3月3日至6日9日)。老年人、退休人员和残疾人的精神病就诊次数减少,失业人员的就诊次数增加。在多变量分析中,住院人数的减少变得显著。远程医疗呼叫从服务开始就逐渐增加,但在隔离结束时有所减少。总之,在隔离期间,转诊到门诊和住院精神病服务的人数减少了,新建立的TMS可能会弥补这一减少。疫情期间与访问相关的最重要因素是就业状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Care Journal
Emergency Care Journal EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
60.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Painful burning lesions on the chest wall of a patient with advanced breast cancer What does a floating mass in a young patient's heart do? A systematic review of the factors influencing retention or turnover intention among emergency personnel in epidemics Estimated plasma volume status can help identify patients with sepsis at risk of death within 30 days in the emergency department A small lump in the abdomen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1