Historical Master Narratives and the Master Narrative of the Bulgarian Middle Ages

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Ceranea Pub Date : 2020-12-23 DOI:10.18778/2084-140x.10.12
R. Daskalov
{"title":"Historical Master Narratives and the Master Narrative of the Bulgarian Middle Ages","authors":"R. Daskalov","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.10.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is a brief and schematic presentation of the notion of a “master narrative” and of the master narrative of the Bulgarian Middle Ages, which is the subject a detailed book of mine in Bulgarian. This master narrative was constructed starting with what is known as “Romantic” historiography (from Monk Paisij’s “Istorija Slavjanobolgarskaja” [Slavonic-Bulgarian History] in 1762 to Vasil Aprilov’s writings in the first half of the nineteenth century) but it was elaborated especially with the development of “scientific” (or critical) historiography first by Marin Drinov (1838–1906) and mainly by the most significant Bulgarian historians from the “bourgeois” era: Vasil Zlatarski (1866–1935), Petăr Mutafčiev (1883–1943), and Petăr Nikov (1884–1938). Then it was interrupted by the (crude) Marxist counter-narrative of the late 1940s through the 1960s. Starting in the late 1960s there was a gradual return to the nationalism of the master national narrative, which reached a peak with the celebration of the 1,300th anniversary of the founding of the Bulgarian state in 1981. The same line continued after 1989 (stripped of the Marxist vulgata), yet some new tendencies appeared.","PeriodicalId":40873,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ceranea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ceranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.10.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article is a brief and schematic presentation of the notion of a “master narrative” and of the master narrative of the Bulgarian Middle Ages, which is the subject a detailed book of mine in Bulgarian. This master narrative was constructed starting with what is known as “Romantic” historiography (from Monk Paisij’s “Istorija Slavjanobolgarskaja” [Slavonic-Bulgarian History] in 1762 to Vasil Aprilov’s writings in the first half of the nineteenth century) but it was elaborated especially with the development of “scientific” (or critical) historiography first by Marin Drinov (1838–1906) and mainly by the most significant Bulgarian historians from the “bourgeois” era: Vasil Zlatarski (1866–1935), Petăr Mutafčiev (1883–1943), and Petăr Nikov (1884–1938). Then it was interrupted by the (crude) Marxist counter-narrative of the late 1940s through the 1960s. Starting in the late 1960s there was a gradual return to the nationalism of the master national narrative, which reached a peak with the celebration of the 1,300th anniversary of the founding of the Bulgarian state in 1981. The same line continued after 1989 (stripped of the Marxist vulgata), yet some new tendencies appeared.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史大师叙事与保加利亚中世纪大师叙事
这篇文章简要介绍了“主叙事”的概念和保加利亚中世纪的主叙事,这是我用保加利亚语写的一本详细的书的主题。这种大师级的叙述是从所谓的“浪漫主义”史学开始构建的(从1762年Monk Paisij的“Istorija Slavjanobolgarskaja”[斯拉夫保加利亚历史]到19世纪上半叶Vasil Aprilov的著作),但它是随着Marin Drinov首先提出的“科学”(或批判)史学的发展而详细阐述的(1838–1906),主要由“资产阶级”时代最重要的保加利亚历史学家:瓦西里·兹拉塔斯基(1866–1935)、佩特尔·穆塔夫切耶夫(1883–1943)和佩特尔·尼科夫(1884–1938)。然后,它被20世纪40年代末到60年代的(粗糙的)马克思主义反叙事打断了。从20世纪60年代末开始,民族主义逐渐回归国家叙事的主流,1981年保加利亚建国1300周年的庆祝活动达到了顶峰。1989年(去掉了马克思主义的vulgata)之后,同样的路线仍在继续,但出现了一些新的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Ceranea
Studia Ceranea HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hymnography in Honour of Saints Constantine and Helena and its Connection with Imperial Ideology The Jewish Theme in Theophanes the Confessor’s Testimony on the Prophet Muḥammad Justinian, Pilgrimages and the Theotokos: Imperial Propaganda in De Aedificiis V Basil I’s Path to Power according to the Vita Basilii as a Heroic Myth Representing the Phlegm: the Portrait of the Phlegmatic in Cesare Ripa’s Iconology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1