What is the cost of including virtual reality in neurological rehabilitation? A scoping review

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2022.2094102
M. Aliprandi, Yvonne Pan, C. Mosley, S. Gough
{"title":"What is the cost of including virtual reality in neurological rehabilitation? A scoping review","authors":"M. Aliprandi, Yvonne Pan, C. Mosley, S. Gough","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2022.2094102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Virtual reality therapy in neurorehabilitation has demonstrated to be an effective, innovative method in increasing patient outcomes by increasing task repetition, interest, and self-efficacy. Despite this, virtual reality is not commonly used in neurorehabilitation centres or hospitals for conditions such as stroke. Objectives The primary aim of this scoping review is to synthesise existing literature exploring the costs associated with including virtual reality into neurorehabilitation. The second aim is to explore the barriers and challenges that impede its adoption in neurorehabilitation. Methods A literature search was conducted yielding a total of 5,647 articles. Eight studies were eligible to be included in the review. Results Findings indicate that virtual reality may be a cost saving adjunct because it decreases the need for therapist time and decreases transportation costs. In addition, findings suggest that commercial virtual reality devices such as the Nintendo Wii may not be designed optimally for neurorehabilitation and virtual reality may not be suitable for patients with significant cognitive and communication deficits. Conclusions Future research should aim to diversify in neurological patient populations, increase the range of economic evaluations, and explore barriers for virtual reality in neurorehabilitation to assist organisations and practitioners in enhancing treatment and ultimately health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2094102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Background Virtual reality therapy in neurorehabilitation has demonstrated to be an effective, innovative method in increasing patient outcomes by increasing task repetition, interest, and self-efficacy. Despite this, virtual reality is not commonly used in neurorehabilitation centres or hospitals for conditions such as stroke. Objectives The primary aim of this scoping review is to synthesise existing literature exploring the costs associated with including virtual reality into neurorehabilitation. The second aim is to explore the barriers and challenges that impede its adoption in neurorehabilitation. Methods A literature search was conducted yielding a total of 5,647 articles. Eight studies were eligible to be included in the review. Results Findings indicate that virtual reality may be a cost saving adjunct because it decreases the need for therapist time and decreases transportation costs. In addition, findings suggest that commercial virtual reality devices such as the Nintendo Wii may not be designed optimally for neurorehabilitation and virtual reality may not be suitable for patients with significant cognitive and communication deficits. Conclusions Future research should aim to diversify in neurological patient populations, increase the range of economic evaluations, and explore barriers for virtual reality in neurorehabilitation to assist organisations and practitioners in enhancing treatment and ultimately health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在神经康复中使用虚拟现实的成本是多少?范围审查
摘要背景神经康复中的虚拟现实治疗已被证明是一种有效、创新的方法,通过增加任务重复性、兴趣和自我效能来提高患者的疗效。尽管如此,虚拟现实在神经康复中心或医院中并不常用于中风等疾病。目的本范围界定综述的主要目的是综合现有文献,探讨将虚拟现实纳入神经康复的相关成本。第二个目的是探索阻碍其在神经康复中应用的障碍和挑战。方法文献检索5647篇。八项研究符合纳入审查的条件。结果研究结果表明,虚拟现实可能是一种节省成本的辅助手段,因为它减少了对治疗师时间的需求,并降低了交通成本。此外,研究结果表明,任天堂Wii等商业虚拟现实设备可能不是为神经康复而设计的最佳设备,虚拟现实可能不适合有严重认知和沟通缺陷的患者。结论未来的研究应旨在使神经系统患者群体多样化,增加经济评估的范围,并探索神经康复中虚拟现实的障碍,以帮助组织和从业者加强治疗并最终获得健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1