Implantation of a Vascular Access Button for Chronic Blood Sampling and Drug Administration in the Rabbit

Surgeries Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.3390/surgeries4020016
J. Ehrmann, Wendy Johnson, Arlene de Castro, Marcie Donnelly
{"title":"Implantation of a Vascular Access Button for Chronic Blood Sampling and Drug Administration in the Rabbit","authors":"J. Ehrmann, Wendy Johnson, Arlene de Castro, Marcie Donnelly","doi":"10.3390/surgeries4020016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rabbits are commonly used for pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicokinetic (TK) studies in the research setting, requiring repetitive venipuncture, which can be challenging in this species. The auricular vessels are commonly used for venipuncture in rabbits. The repetitive access of these delicate vessels can lead to trauma such as hematomas causing venipuncture to become more challenging as the study progresses. In turn, this leads to missed time points or insufficient blood samples. Surgical models for chronic vascular access in rabbits are common throughout the industry. Common models include exteriorized vascular catheters and implanted vascular access ports. However, these implants come with their own complications and restrictions when used in rabbits. Therefore, the authors evaluated the use of a vascular access button (VAB), an implant commonly used in small rodents, as a refinement to the current chronic models in use in the industry. Seventeen rabbits were implanted with either single or dual channel VABs. The catheters were implanted in the femoral artery and/or vein and then tunneled subcutaneously to the button on the dorsal thoracic area. Overall, the results were outstanding, and an established model was created. The average patency rate was 316 days with several implants still patent after 2 years. The authors feel the implantation and use of a vascular access button in rabbits for routine PK studies is an excellent refinement. The rabbits tolerate the buttons extremely well with minimal issues. The patency rate is equal to or better than vascular access ports and when used with the tethering system, provides a hands-off method for blood collection and intravenous administration in rabbits during PK studies.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4020016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rabbits are commonly used for pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicokinetic (TK) studies in the research setting, requiring repetitive venipuncture, which can be challenging in this species. The auricular vessels are commonly used for venipuncture in rabbits. The repetitive access of these delicate vessels can lead to trauma such as hematomas causing venipuncture to become more challenging as the study progresses. In turn, this leads to missed time points or insufficient blood samples. Surgical models for chronic vascular access in rabbits are common throughout the industry. Common models include exteriorized vascular catheters and implanted vascular access ports. However, these implants come with their own complications and restrictions when used in rabbits. Therefore, the authors evaluated the use of a vascular access button (VAB), an implant commonly used in small rodents, as a refinement to the current chronic models in use in the industry. Seventeen rabbits were implanted with either single or dual channel VABs. The catheters were implanted in the femoral artery and/or vein and then tunneled subcutaneously to the button on the dorsal thoracic area. Overall, the results were outstanding, and an established model was created. The average patency rate was 316 days with several implants still patent after 2 years. The authors feel the implantation and use of a vascular access button in rabbits for routine PK studies is an excellent refinement. The rabbits tolerate the buttons extremely well with minimal issues. The patency rate is equal to or better than vascular access ports and when used with the tethering system, provides a hands-off method for blood collection and intravenous administration in rabbits during PK studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入血管进入按钮用于兔慢性血液取样和给药
在研究环境中,兔子通常用于药代动力学(PK)和毒代动力学(TK)研究,需要重复静脉穿刺,这在该物种中可能具有挑战性。耳廓血管通常用于兔子的静脉穿刺。重复进入这些脆弱的血管可能会导致血肿等创伤,随着研究的进展,静脉穿刺变得更具挑战性。反过来,这会导致错过时间点或血液样本不足。兔慢性血管通路的手术模型在整个行业中很常见。常见的模型包括外部血管导管和植入的血管进入口。然而,这些植入物在兔子身上使用时有其自身的并发症和限制。因此,作者评估了血管进入按钮(VAB)的使用,这是一种常见于小型啮齿动物的植入物,是对目前行业中使用的慢性模型的改进。17只兔子植入了单通道或双通道VAB。将导管植入股动脉和/或静脉,然后通过皮下隧道连接至胸背部的按钮。总的来说,结果是突出的,并建立了一个既定的模式。平均通畅率为316天,其中数个植入物在2年后仍处于专利状态。作者认为,在兔子身上植入和使用血管进入按钮进行常规PK研究是一种极好的改进。兔子对纽扣的耐受性非常好,问题很少。通畅率等于或优于血管接入口,当与栓系系统一起使用时,为PK研究期间兔子的血液采集和静脉给药提供了一种无需干预的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
N-Acetylcysteine’s Potential Role in Prophylaxis and Treatment of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: From Evidence to Patient-Side Research Transversus Abdominis Plane with Rectus Sheath Blocks Versus Port Site Infiltration of Local Anaesthesia in Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—Does It Reduce Postoperative Opiate Requirement? A Pilot Study Mechanisms of Degradation of Collagen or Gelatin Materials (Hemostatic Sponges) in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis in Adults: A Life-Threatening Emergency in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery The Influence of Root Prominence on the Onset of Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1