Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness: Objective and Subjective Evaluation.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-02 DOI:10.1177/01455613221099996
Ali AlFarraj, Manal AlIbrahim, Haifa AlHajjaj, Fatima Khater, Ali AlGhamdi, Jose Fayad
{"title":"Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness: Objective and Subjective Evaluation.","authors":"Ali AlFarraj, Manal AlIbrahim, Haifa AlHajjaj, Fatima Khater, Ali AlGhamdi, Jose Fayad","doi":"10.1177/01455613221099996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the audiological outcomes and subjective benefits of transcutaneous bone conduction implants (BCIs) in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted on 11 patients with SSD implantations between 2015 and 2018 at a tertiary center. Pure-tone audiometry, speech reception threshold (SRT), and speech-in-noise (SPIN) tests were performed. Preoperative and postoperative performances were compared. Subjective satisfaction level was assessed using validated questionnaires. A PubMed search was conducted to identify the relevant studies published to date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients demonstrated significant audiological improvements compared with their preoperative condition. The mean SRT improved significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.001) from 109 dB to 23 dB after implantation. The mean SPIN score improved significantly after implantation. The questionnaires showed an overall positive benefit of transcutaneous bone conduction devices (BCDs). A literature search revealed 21 articles, of which 14 reported the use of BCIs in patients with SSD. Our results agree with the published evidence showing the overall benefit of BCI in patients with SSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transcutaneous BCDs could be considered as an alternative treatment option for patients with SSD, it could show good audiological outcomes and high satisfaction levels. Further studies should be conducted on patients with SSD to determine the most appropriate hearing solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51041,"journal":{"name":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"NP92-NP100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613221099996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the audiological outcomes and subjective benefits of transcutaneous bone conduction implants (BCIs) in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD).

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 11 patients with SSD implantations between 2015 and 2018 at a tertiary center. Pure-tone audiometry, speech reception threshold (SRT), and speech-in-noise (SPIN) tests were performed. Preoperative and postoperative performances were compared. Subjective satisfaction level was assessed using validated questionnaires. A PubMed search was conducted to identify the relevant studies published to date.

Results: All patients demonstrated significant audiological improvements compared with their preoperative condition. The mean SRT improved significantly (p = 0.001) from 109 dB to 23 dB after implantation. The mean SPIN score improved significantly after implantation. The questionnaires showed an overall positive benefit of transcutaneous bone conduction devices (BCDs). A literature search revealed 21 articles, of which 14 reported the use of BCIs in patients with SSD. Our results agree with the published evidence showing the overall benefit of BCI in patients with SSD.

Conclusions: Transcutaneous BCDs could be considered as an alternative treatment option for patients with SSD, it could show good audiological outcomes and high satisfaction levels. Further studies should be conducted on patients with SSD to determine the most appropriate hearing solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮骨传导植入在单侧耳聋患者中的应用:客观与主观评价。
目的本研究旨在探讨经皮骨传导植入物(BCIs)治疗单侧耳聋(SSD)患者的听力学结果和主观益处。方法本回顾性研究于2015年至2018年间在一家三级中心对11名SSD植入患者进行。进行纯音测听、语音接收阈值(SRT)和噪声中语音(SPIN)测试。比较术前和术后的表现。主观满意度使用经验证的问卷进行评估。PubMed检索了迄今为止发表的相关研究。结果与术前相比,所有患者的听力均有显著改善。植入后,平均SRT从109dB显著改善(p=0.001)至23dB。植入后平均SPIN评分显著改善。问卷调查显示,经皮骨传导装置(BCDs)总体上具有积极的益处。文献检索显示有21篇文章,其中14篇报道了脑机接口在SSD患者中的应用。我们的研究结果与已发表的证据一致,表明脑机接口对SSD患者的总体益处。结论经皮BCDs可作为SSD患者的一种替代治疗选择,它可显示良好的听力学结果和高满意度。应对SSD患者进行进一步研究,以确定最合适的听力解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal provides practical, peer-reviewed original clinical articles, highlighting scientific research relevant to clinical care, and case reports that describe unusual entities or innovative approaches to treatment and case management. ENT Journal utilizes multiple channels to deliver authoritative and timely content that informs, engages, and shapes the industry now and into the future.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of EDS-FLU on Objective and Patient-Reported Subjective Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx Arising within Cleft Palate Surgical Scar. Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness: Objective and Subjective Evaluation. Mean platelet volume may not be associated with the prognosis of oral cancer. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma originating in the subglottic larynx.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1