China-India Face-offs: How Does Reputation Matter in Crisis Management?

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary China Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1080/10670564.2022.2090082
D. Ollapally
{"title":"China-India Face-offs: How Does Reputation Matter in Crisis Management?","authors":"D. Ollapally","doi":"10.1080/10670564.2022.2090082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines five direct border conflicts between China and India to study how well the reputational effects of their crisis management conformed to conventional deterrence expectations. This article finds that how these crises are settled suggests that instead of deterrence expectations of resolve-oriented behavior, China and India have engaged in reassurance-oriented behavior. Answering why reassurance has taken precedence over resolve even under crises conditions, it is argued that despite the two countries being at odds on the specific and highly salient border issue, they recognize the value of broader joint gains, which in turn is buttressed by a shared ‘post-colonial’ identity and common worldview on questions of global order.","PeriodicalId":47894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary China","volume":"32 1","pages":"417 - 435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary China","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2090082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines five direct border conflicts between China and India to study how well the reputational effects of their crisis management conformed to conventional deterrence expectations. This article finds that how these crises are settled suggests that instead of deterrence expectations of resolve-oriented behavior, China and India have engaged in reassurance-oriented behavior. Answering why reassurance has taken precedence over resolve even under crises conditions, it is argued that despite the two countries being at odds on the specific and highly salient border issue, they recognize the value of broader joint gains, which in turn is buttressed by a shared ‘post-colonial’ identity and common worldview on questions of global order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中印对峙:声誉在危机管理中如何重要?
摘要本文考察了中印之间的五次直接边境冲突,以研究两国危机管理的声誉影响在多大程度上符合传统威慑预期。本文发现,这些危机的解决方式表明,中国和印度没有采取以决心为导向的威慑预期,而是采取了以保证为导向的行为。在回答为什么即使在危机条件下,保证也优先于解决问题时,有人认为,尽管两国在具体而高度突出的边界问题上存在分歧,但他们认识到更广泛的共同利益的价值,而这反过来又得到了共同的“后殖民”身份和全球秩序问题上的共同世界观的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary China is the only English language journal edited in North America that provides exclusive information about contemporary Chinese affairs for scholars, businessmen and government policy-makers. It publishes articles of theoretical and policy research and research notes, as well as book reviews. The journal"s fields of interest include economics, political science, law, culture, literature, business, history, international relations, sociology and other social sciences and humanities.
期刊最新文献
The Ramifications of China’s Maritime Equipment Industry Policies for the EU Impact of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor on Nation-Building in Pakistan: A Case Study of Balochistan Institutional Design and Rhetorical Spaces: China’s Human Rights Strategies in a Changing World Order Diverse Patterns of Paradiplomacy by Chinese Local Governments: A Comparative Case Study of Zhejiang and Yunnan Provinces Party Corporatism in Urban China: Grid Governance and Resurgent Centralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1